Comments for Revenue-Sharing Figures ('02, '03, '05, '07, '08, '09) at http://bizofbaseball.com , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments http://bizofbaseball.com Wed, 22 May 2013 19:20:07 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3760:complete-revenue-sharing-figures-02-03-05&catid=&Itemid=178#comment-1407 This seems like a fair system.....Why should big market fans have to subsidize smaller market teams anymore than they already have been doing. NOTICE, I said "BIG MARKET FANS," which pay exorbinant prices for tickets and other expenses at the ballpark. - Supermet Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:11:24 +0100 http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3760:complete-revenue-sharing-figures-02-03-05&catid=&Itemid=178#comment-1393 Does anyone know if the low 2005 payment to the Nationals was because they were precluded from more by sale/transfer agreements betwixt them and the Expos just prior to that season? Or did some of the big money that would have been due the 'Spos get retained by the sellers -- a.k.a. MLB themselves? Quite apart, whatever you think of Boras, I think his squawking about rev. redistribution + licensing, new media, etc., etc. versus actual team spending is bound to shake up baseball (which is probably quite busy being chuffed with itself for "handling" the PED kerfuffle so damn well). I dig these lists. As much as they depress me. - HighJaysFan Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:52:07 +0100