<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Maury Brown Dresses Down Maury Brown on Releasing &quot;The List&quot;</title>
		<description>Comments for Maury Brown Dresses Down Maury Brown on Releasing &quot;The List&quot; at http://bizofbaseball.com , comment 1 to 5 out of 5 comments</description>
		<link>http://bizofbaseball.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:56:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Kudos!</title>
			<link>http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3452:maury-brown-dresses-down-maury-brown-on-releasing-qthe-listq&amp;catid=26:editorials&amp;Itemid=39#comment-1084</link>
			<description>Kudos to you, Maury, for admitting the errors of your ways, and writing about it. You're not the only one frustrated over all of this. - Tom Swift</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:07:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rules vs laws</title>
			<link>http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3452:maury-brown-dresses-down-maury-brown-on-releasing-qthe-listq&amp;catid=26:editorials&amp;Itemid=39#comment-1083</link>
			<description> i may be wrong here, but aren't steroids illegal? not against the rules, illegal. just like pot, cocaine,illegal. 

 how can the players union or mlb be fighting for the guy's that broke the law? how can mlb make an agreement to destroy the findings of players that used steroids?

 this is a much bigger moral issue than most realize. not to mention the legal issue's. - andy</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 01:40:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Respect.</title>
			<link>http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3452:maury-brown-dresses-down-maury-brown-on-releasing-qthe-listq&amp;catid=26:editorials&amp;Itemid=39#comment-1080</link>
			<description>Good take. You have to assume there will be lawsuits regardless here, but MLBPA should both take the opportunity to stop the bleeding.

Personally, I hate when fans/writers single-out accused &quot;users.&quot;  There's little you can do to defend PED use, but if everyone was doing it, how can you say guys like McGwire/Bonds aren't HOF-worthy?

HOF qualifications should be based on dominance versus peers.  If you dominate your peers in the &quot;steriod&quot; era, it's just as impressive as dominating your peers in the &quot;dead ball&quot; era, the &quot;live ball&quot; era, etc.

And don't even start me on HOFers like Mickey Mantle or Babe Ruth and their constant use of &quot;greenies&quot;... - Noah Pransky</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:24:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks, and fixed</title>
			<link>http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3452:maury-brown-dresses-down-maury-brown-on-releasing-qthe-listq&amp;catid=26:editorials&amp;Itemid=39#comment-1079</link>
			<description>Thanks, Will. Appreciate the comments. Article has been adjusted. - Maury Brown</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:36:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks</title>
			<link>http://bizofbaseball.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=3452:maury-brown-dresses-down-maury-brown-on-releasing-qthe-listq&amp;catid=26:editorials&amp;Itemid=39#comment-1078</link>
			<description>Big of you to admit a mistake. Many could take a lesson from that.

One minor quibble. The testing wasn't confidential, it was anonymous. Confidential implies the list wasn't to be released. Anonymous is that there shouldn't have been a list in the first place. - William Carroll</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:00:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
