hair straightener products for african-american hair best virtual hair makeovers best hair straighteners for short curly hair best hair straightener 2015 tips for straightening curly or wavy hair try on hairstyles using your own photo men virtual hair color changers splash images for hair straighteners styles using yaki hairstyle virtual change hair straightener walmart canada head best hair straightening products reviews virtual hairstyler free upload photo and try hairstyles for free permanent hair straightening before and after free virtual try on hairstyles for men men's hair straightener walmart images for brazilian hair straightening shampoo the perfector hair tool qvc outlets battery operated hair straightener walmart pharmacy customer reviews perfector fusion styler free virtual hairstyle makeover online hsi professional ceramic tourmaline ionic flat iron hair straightener virtual hairstyle tester streax pro hair straightener cream intense mountain try on different hairstyles appropriate for interviews perfector hair styler ebay package tracking chemical hair straightener found in pharmacy try hairstyles on your photo free instyle the hair perfector reviews keratin hair straightening salons in fremont ca african-american hair the perfector hair brush reviews images for as seen on tv hair straightening tools ceramic hair straightener and curler in one solid ceramic hair straighteners organic hair straighteners for black hair images for try new hairstyle men 2015 images for latest hairstyle virtual makeovers hair straightening cost in hyderabad andhra keratin hair straightening maintenance technician rules of japanese hair straightening treatment tips on straightening black hair try on different hairstyles digitally enhanced images for salon hair straighteners nz try new hairstyles approved brazilian hair straightening treatment in nyc virtual hairstyle makeover programs virtual hairstyles blogspot search try a hairstyle on free japanese hair straightening before and after pics slim hair straighteners bootsy perfector hair styler vs instyler wet try black hairstyles virtual reality hair replacement try different hairstyles on your photo max hair straightener target weekly ad free virtual hair salon games try new hairstyle men's japanese hair straightening treatment negative effects on hair shaft images for hairstyles virtual online best hair straighteners for thick hair images for hair straightening shampoo for men men's hair straightener walmart stores ceramic hair straightener flat iron chi hair straightener on amazon best ceramic hair straightener on the market images for hair styler straightener images for hair straightener products hair straighteners ghd uk official website buy permanent hair straightening products virtual hairstyle makeover online virtual hairstyle finder for men no heat hair straighteners for black hair try a hairstyle tool online japanese hair straightening treatment on african-american hair amazon hair straighteners ghd clarins instant light brush on perfector 02 poczta try hairstyles on your face male images crying hairstyle virtual mirror glasses for mri how much does brazilian hair straightening cost hairstyles to try on your photo face app revlon hair straightener ceramic reviews of windows try hairstyles on my face app hair straightener products chi try on different hairstyles application try hairstyles on your photo free app virtual hair colour chooser virtual hair color changer clairol textures sonia kashuk complexion perfector brush perfector hair styler ebay uk my summary keratin hair straightening treatment products chemical hair straighteners for curly hair images for hairstyles virtual mirror ray-ban rb zelo keratin hair straightening reviews clarin instant light brush on perfector scientific hairstyle virtual mentor the perfector hair tool review try different hairstyles online virtually famous the perfector curling iron reviews what is a good hair straightener for thin hair chi hair straightener reviews 2014 best hair straighteners for black hair try out a hairstyle on your photo free how to do keratin hair straightening at home slim hair straighteners boots on sale try on hairstyles male celebrity wallpaper how will i look with short hair virtual makeover images for hair style virtual free hair straightening treatments for black women hair straightening shampoo for men change your hairstyle virtually free showboat hair perfector customer service images for hairstyles virtual mirror eyeglasses glasses images for wella permanent hair straightening cream eva ceramic hair straighteners salon hair straighteners products try on hairstyles online free try different hairstyles online virtually there eticket images for hairstyle virtualizer pro virtual hair style try different hairstyles male studio try perfector fusion styler as seen on tv images for celebrity hairstyle virtual makeover images for hairstyles virtual makeover free hair remington hair straightener walmart hairstyle virtual mirror eyeglasses cheap images for virtual short hairstyles for women over 40 perfector curling iron ghd classic styler ceramic hair straightener review hair straightener products for black hair amazon perfector fusion styler android app try on different hairstyles images for virtual hairstyle makeover online try on hairstyles males and females hairstyle virtual online virtual hairstyle makeover free women free app to try different hairstyles free virtual hairstyle software with makeover solutions new york images for hair straightener with brush as seen on tv try a hairstyle virtual try on hairstyles free clairol products hair try on a new hairstyle free program latest hair straighteners 2012 election hairstyles try on your face free lcd images for hair straightener styles checks types of chemical hair straighteners perfector hair brush ukraine images for straightening ceramic hair brush free virtual hair men images for short hairstyles virtual hairstyles virtual studio innovations perfector hair styler 2 for apx auto images for hair straightener styles for less ceramic hair straightener chic maxiglide hair straightener styles of leadership try on hairstyles malestrazza perfector hair styler video camera clarins instant light brush-on perfector makeupalley best hair straightener of 2015 try different hairstyles virtually try on a hairstyles with a hook how to try on different hairstyles online editor the perfector hair curler virtual hairstyler free download try different hairstyles male short hairstyle try on hairstyles virtually for free with ipad hair straightener holder suppliers ceramic hair straightener target weekly ad hair styler virtual free online hairstyles to try on yourself hair straightener walmart call best hair straighteners for extremely curly hair upload your photo and try on hairstyles free salon hair straighteners by hot tools hair straightening cost in delhi india hair straightener chi website images for hair straightening shampoo perfector for short hair free virtual hair styler download hair straightening spray walmart instyler rotating hot iron hair straightener best hair straighteners creams for rashes hair straighteners ghd uk straighteners hairstyle virtual mirror glasses for tv free virtual hair imaging the perfector hair tool qvc outlet store hairstyle try out free virtual hair model perfector hair styler vs instyler rotating iron try on hairstyles for free haircuts virtual hair color changer highlights for kids perfector hair styler qvc diamonique earrings potholder into hair straightener iron holder app to try different hairstyles for men virtual hairstyle generator free virtual hairstyles free african american try on hairstyles free clairol natural instincts coupons ghd hair straighteners ebay uk how to use hair straighteners brushes and brews chemical hair straightener safety solutions images for virtual hairstyle free online images for salon hair straighteners uk athletics kora hair straightening brush as seen on tv best hair straighteners for curly hair slim hair straighteners argos farm try different hairstyles on your photo men my style hair straightener virtual hair color changer funky colors with short chemical hair straighteners for caucasian images for try black hairstyles online design images for chocolate keratin hair straightening reviews style hair straightener perfector hair styler ebay buying selling try a hairstyle free mensa tests keratin hair straightening treatment chi hair straightener at target best hair straightening shampoo reviews calista hair perfector 1 1/2 inch ceramic hair straightener vs metal braces japanese hair straightening reviews 2014 perfector hair styler infomercials best virtual hair makeover sites hair straightening shampoo products hair straightener cream reviews keratin hair straightening buy hair straightening combs ghd classic styler ceramic hair straightener 170c to fahrenheit try on male hairstyles pictures what's a good hair straightener images for hair straightener cream malaysia best hair straightener 2015 uk football virtual hair cutter mp3 joiner try hairstyles on your face clairol beautiful collection brazilian hair straightening treatment perfector styler bed bath and beyond hours using calista hair perfector styling try on hairstyle online hairstyles virtual makeover free upload hairstyle try outs short hairstyles virtual makeovers with my face best hair straighteners for african-american hair care pro ceramic hair straightener as seen on tv reviews on japanese hair straightening virtual hairstyles for free upload photo men in black try out hairstyle app images for ceramic hair straightener brush perfector hair styler qvcc college hair straighteners ghd parts instyler hair straightener target chemical hair straightening facts and comparisons try on hairstyles male celebrity plastic surgery instyler rotating hot iron hair straightener new ogilvie hair straightener target pharmacy images for hair straightener cream in india try a hairstyle apps for free hairstyles virtual makeover free perfector hair styler hsi professional ceramic tourmaline ionic flat iron hair straightener review hairstyle virtual free ceramic hair straightener target coupons try on virtual hairstyles clairol perfect permanent hair straightening salons in nj hair straightener brush spin images for salon hair straighteners ukiah non chemical hair straightening products for black hair chemical hair straightening while pregnant images for salon hair straighteners nzb images for clarins instant light brush on perfector 027 free hairstyle app to try new cuts on men newest hair straighteners best hair straighteners reviews consumer reports hair straightener walmart canada careers herstyler hair straightener holder hairstyles to try on my picture keratin hair straightening ulta salon the perfector hair tool qvc homepage best hair straightener reviews 2012 perfector hair styler ebay australia buy try different hairstyles male black cat images for hair straightener styles 4 less clothing the perfector hair tool qvc outlet rehoboth slim hair straighteners boots and pants permanent hair straightener cream styler hair straightener chemical hair straightening facts tuition hair straightener amazon product search chemical hair straightener for black hair salons with virtual hairstyle software free instyler hair straightener video ghd classic styler ceramic hair straightener 170 cc utv hair straightener amazon product reviewer hairstyles virtual free menu brazilian hair straightening salons ceramic hair straightener professional property try different hairstyles online uk virtual hair color changer highlights hidden try different hairstyles male asian model try hairstyles on your face apps iphone hairstyles virtual mirror technology tv hair straightening irons consumer reports best hair straightening products for natural hair the perfector hair styler youtube broadcast yourself language try different hairstyles male celebrity remington hair straighteners boots pharmacy hairstyles virtual free mensa hair straightening tips at home change hairstyles virtually free images for hair straightener styles for short calista perfector brush curling irons hair straightener reviews good housekeeping hair perfector calista reviews hair straightener brands usa reviews for the perfector hair styler clarin instant light brush on perfector curling men's hairstyles makeover virtual free photo images for easy hair straightening tips flat try hairstyles on your face maleficent perfector hair dryer the hair perfector styler hair straightening cost in delhi zoo good hair straighteners latest hair straighteners 2015 horoscope hair straightening products for african-american hair salons best flat iron hair straightener brands images for hairstyles virtual mirror ray-ban sunglasses instyler hair straightener as seen on tv hair straightening cost in hyderabad charminar different hairstyles to try out try on hairstyles using your own photo men street revlon hair straightener ceramic reviews on garcinia perfector pro styling brush as seen on tv try hairstyles on your face male images models non chemical hair straightening products conair infiniti hair straightener walmart savings try perfector hair styler slim hair straighteners for short hair virtual hairstyle app permanent hair straightening reviews hair straightening tips for thick hair try on a hairstyle virtually meaning virtual makeovers and hairstyles free celebrity hairstyle virtual makeover best hair straighteners under 50 images for try on hairstyles male celebrity faces try on hairstyles free clairol coupons p&g virtual hairstyle app for android in style hair straightener price try on hairstyles male short hair ogilvie hair straightener walmart try on a hairstyle application for mobiles professional hair straighteners chemicals tri perfector curling iron brush hair straightening iron reviews how to try different hairstyles online for free hairstyle virtual mirror ray-ban try on hairstyles male black lab herstyler hair straightener ceramic hair straightener target pharmacy best hair straightener 2015 uk basketball free virtual hairstyles upload photo men in singapore the perfector hair styling reviews virtual hairstyling programs try hairstyle men hairstyles to try on your photo face on a stick hairst try different hairstyles on your own photo for free hairstyle virtual mirror coastal contact coupon ghd gold series classic styler hair straightener review much does permanent hair straightening cost hair perfector styler reviews permanent hair straightening options try on hairstyles virtually free ac free virtual hair styler try hairstyles on my photo images for ceramic hair straightener as seen on tv try different hairstyles on my face for free images for salon hair straighteners nz herald japanese hair straightening salons virginia hair straightening products without formaldehyde the perfector fusion hair styler app to try on hairstyles free app hot tools hair straightener walmart stores best permanent hair straighteners images for hair straightening shampoos slim hair straighteners boots with the fur ghd hair straighteners ebay uk only seller ceramic hair straightener walmartone app hair perfector by calista tools images for hair straightener and curling iron in one free virtual hairstyles online makeovers try on a hairstyle appreciation day verses japanese hair straightening salons in ct hype hair virtual hairstyle applications try out a hairstyle men receding remington hair straighteners argos online hairstyles virtual mirror technology best app to try on hairstyles best brush for straightening curly hair try hairstyles on your face men try hairstyles on your photo try different hairstyles male short haired hair straighteners as seen on tv japanese hair straightening system perfector hair styler vs instyler curling irons hype hair virtual hairstyle application for mobiles instyler hair straightener reviews india virtual hairstyle online free virtual hairstyling websites revlon dual voltage hair straightener walmart savings try hairstyles on my face app icerik ceramic hair straightener walmart savings card hot tools hair straightener walmart savings ghd hair straighteners argos try on hairstyles virtually free atlantic city try on a hairstyle free online perfector hair styler qvc outlet rehoboth brazilian hair straightening dangers hair straightener ceramic hair straightener walmart credit infiniti pro conair hair straightener walmart locations images for hair straighteners that curl perfector hair styler qvc outlet lancaster the perfector curling irons hair straightener and curling iron in one chemical hair straightening facts about mars hair straightening iron with comb 3/4 inch perfector hair style brush up hair straightener walmart usa site slim hair straighteners boots for men styling men;s hair with straighteners images for hair straightening comb style elements hair straightener gl829 perfector hair styler ebay buying sporting ghd classic styler ceramic hair straightener amazon product try on hairstyles free clairol nice images for hair straightener styles p quotes images for virtual hairstyle makeover free hairstyles virtual mirror eyeglasses frames virtual hairstyles apps for computer hairstyles virtual mirror technology news calista perfector brush curling iron japanese hair straightening salons in md japanese hair straightening reviews dual voltage hair straightener target weekly ad images for steam hair straightener brands images for hair straightener styles p albums try on hairstyles free upload picture clairol natural instincts free hair styler virtual upload photo japanese hair straightening system youtube buying japanese hair straightening products hair straightening cost in delhi or at delhi maxiglide hair straightener styles of writing hair straightening cost in delhi ncr hair straightener products for african-american hair color free try hairstyles on my face hair straightening spray as seen on tv perfector pro grip digital fusion styler cute ways to style your hair with a straightener hairstyles virtually images for free virtual hairstyles online new hairstyle hair straightener walmart usa stores free virtual hairstyles for men upload photo style my hair virtual free the hair perfector toolbar try on different hairstyles digitally free virtual hairstyles for men program brazilian hair straightening iron try on a hairstyle appreciation day try on hairstyles with your picture for free men;s virtual hairstyles free upload photo images for salon hair straighteners uk daily mail chemical hair straightening at home hair styler hair straightener new hair brush straightener the perfector hair styling tool returnal japanese hair straightening free online virtual male hairstyle try a hairstyle online upload photo the perfector hair styling tool amazon - mens virtual hairstyles free upload photo images for hairstyles virtual mirror screen try different hairstyles online male fashion easy hair straightening tips for curly hair app to try on hairstyles free apps perfector hair styler qvc diamonique necklaces try on hairstyles free clairol hair color latest hair straighteners 2012 running brazilian hair straightening dangers of soy good salon hair straighteners try different hairstyles online virtually there itinerary perfector hair styler qvc outlet stores hair straightener products for african-american hair extensions how to use hair straighteners youtube mp3 free virtual hairstyle software with makeover solutions web try on different hairstyles and colors for free online keratin hair straightening treatment reviews best free virtual hairstyle website perfector hair styling brush as seen on tv conair infiniti hair straightener walmart coupons images for african american hair straightening tools perfector hair styler 2 for apx auto part

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1246 guests online

Atom RSS

feed-image Feed Entries
The Biz of Baseball :: Business of Sports Network
Podcast: Mike Dee of Fenway Sports Group PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 271
Sports Business Radio Podcasts
Written by Sports Business Radio   
Saturday, 10 March 2007 10:18

Mike DeeThe following audio interview (MP3) is with Mike Dee, the president of Fenway Sports Group. (play the interview below)

Dee was also named as Red Sox Chief Operating Officer March 7, 2004, less than 2 years after he joined the club as Executive Vice President/Business Affairs on July 15, 2002. The nine-year baseball veteran manages the club's business operations.

Below are excerpts from the interview, courtesy of Sports Business Radio

On the arrival of Daisuke Matsuzaka and the plan to promote the Red Sox brand in Japan:

"I don't think we've seen anything that rivals this in terms of fan interest and just attention. You know what we're hoping to do obviously is convert that (fan interest and attention) eventually in to business. And I say 'eventually' because you know, this was not an investment that we made with an eye on a quick hit. The longer term goal is to lay the ground work and foundation in Japan for Japanese corporations to invest in Fenway Park and invest in the Red Sox and obviously that is driven by expanding our fan base in Japan and throughout Asia."

On the impact of Daisuke Matsuzaka on Tokyo to Boston travel:

"When we announced we signed Daisuke, there weren't direct flights, believe it or not, from Tokyo to Boston. Now I know two or three airlines are in the process of adding direct flights during the baseball season. That's a clear and measurable impact of what we'll see."

On the intense media interest in Daisuke Matsuzaka:

"We think this is only the tip of the iceberg. As we get in to the season, we're expanding the press box at Fenway Park to accommodate all of the new interest. Hopefully we'll find ourselves in a playoff/postseason situation where I think we're going to have to lease space across the street to handle all of the international media that would have an interest. We're in a standing room only situation and I think we've roughly doubled the size of the press box by annexing some space that was previously back of the house space and I think we're up to 226 positions in the media area."

On the new Fenway Roush Racing venture:

Sports Business Radio"We love racing. We love the fundamentals of NASCAR. The business, the extraordinary growth that's taken place over the last decade is unparalleled. Viewership levels are second only to the NFL. We just think its a great compliment to our core business and we're excited to be in the sport.

This interview is courtesy of Sports Business Radio, and is published by permission. 

TOMS: Why MLB is Thriving.... and Dying PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 684
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 10 February 2014 15:02

MLBEarlier this winter I listened to a sports radio segment where 2 Toronto sports pundits attempted to explain the seemingly counter - intuitive news that MLB annual revenues have climbed to upwards of $8 billion.

On the one hand, they noted, steadily diminishing national TV ratings (including ASG and WS), reveal that baseball is clearly less popular. And hasn’t the NFL, long ago, and by a wide margin, supplanted MLB as the dominant pro sports league? And wasn’t it, after all, inevitable? Isn’t baseball anachronistic? From a slower, analogue, monolithic popular culture?

On the other hand, they understood why MLB revenues have skyrocketed. The biggest factor being the enormous increase in TV $$ from both national, and especially, local deals. Plus, attendance is stable, at near-record levels. And yes, almost ironically, slow, staid MLB has better exploited the internet than any of the other so-called Big 4.

They’re right, on both counts. Yes, baseball is dying. And the evidence is not found in the diminished national TV ratings (TV ratings are down for all programming except the NFL) but in who, and who isn’t, watching. Old guys, not young guys, like baseball. Jonathan Mahler was amongst those who reported this fall that the median age of the 2012 WS TV viewer was 53.4. Perhaps more telling is the steady, long-term decline in the number of kids playing baseball.

But it is precisely because MLB fans are old that business is booming. The huge boost in MLB TV $$ comes from us old guys who subscribe to Pay TV. We are footing the bill for the recent spate of MLB mega deals with local RSNs. We aren’t the cord-cutting, digital natives who have never paid for content. They believe that paying $100/month to watch video is stupid. Earlier in the year Joe Flint reported that, “By 2015, almost half of all television viewing will be done by folks over the age of 50…” The migration of local MLB broadcasts from free over-the-air TV to Pay TV was inevitable. Why? Because MLB fans can afford Pay TV. We are baby boomers, the most affluent generation in history. And baseball fans are the most affluent of sports fans. We complain about our cable bills, we’re old, so we’re allowed. But we’ll still pay for the nightly, pleasant, familiar, tribal, ritualistic pleasures of watching our team on our big TVs, in our comfortable basements. It feels good.

While there is debate about the future prospects for the Pay TV industry, under pressure from OTT, potentially one, or some of, Google, Apple and Aereo, and politicians and regulators sabre-rattling over channel bundling…. in the present, it’s still thriving. And as long as MLB continues to aggregate large TV audiences of purchasers of financial services, luxury autos and ED remedies , there’ll be plenty of money in it for them.

You can follow me on Twitter @PeteToms

Pete Toms is senior writer for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

Exclusive Clip: Sports Unfiltered with Dennis Miller PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 216
Dennis Miller
Written by Maury Brown   
Sunday, 02 December 2007 15:51

Through the Business of Sports Network's partnership with Sinuate Media, we offer up clips of Sports Unfiltered with Dennis Miller each week.

This week, we offer up a super exclusive clip, only available on The Biz of Baseball

Click Here! 

Select Read More to see this week's super exclusive clip 

5 Questions with... Rob Neyer PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 238
5 Questions With...
Written by Maury Brown   
Monday, 17 September 2007 01:18

Rob NeyerWhen it came time to select an interview subject for our One-Year Anniversary Celebration, it was really no contest. There may be more powerful figures in sports (Bud Selig, I’m still awaiting your call). There may be more controversial subjects (Ditto for you, Barry), but Rob Neyer seemed a perfect fit for a number of reasons.

For one, while I really dislike how some view the word “blog” (look, I don’t live in my mother’s basement and don’t post dribble like, “Who’s the Hottest Wife in MLB?”), the fact is, for now, The Biz of Baseball is an alternative electronic media outlet (read: blog). Neyer has been the one guy who was able to bridge the gap between mainstream and alternative media during his long career (11 years and running) as a senior baseball writer for Rob is arguably the “crossover guy” – the man able to take the heady world of objective analysis and make it cool to all in the mainstream. Bill James may have been his mentor, but Rob was able to present it in a way that everyone could easily digest.

He’s also spun several books that are entertaining was well as informative. Whether it has been "The Neyer/James Guide to Pitchers" (with Bill James) or "Rob Neyer's Big Book of Baseball Blunders" or Rob’s upcoming Big Book on baseball myths, his style of writing rarely seems to offend, and often brings a smile.

Neyer is also accessible. This isn’t something being said because the guy was willing to an interview, it’s that in the years I've known him, he’s been one of the nicest and easily approachable people in the media. That, and rarely do most allow you to rifle through their personal research library.

So, on the one-year anniversary of The Biz of Baseball, we present, “5 Questions with… Rob Neyer. - Maury Brown

(Select Read More to see Neyer’s interview)

Maury Brown

Maury Brown is the founder and president of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football and The Biz of Basketball (The Biz of Hockey will be launching shortly). He is also a contributor to Baseball Prospectus.

He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted here.

Review: Diamond Dollars & The Baseball Economist PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 199
Book Reviews
Written by Andrew Zimbalist   
Monday, 10 December 2007 20:00

Book Review - Zimbalist - Diamond Dollar$ and The Baseball EconomistReview essay on Vince Gennaro, Diamond Dollars: The Economics of Winning in Baseball.
Hingham, Ma.: Maple Street Press, 2007, 253 pp.,


J.C. Bradbury, The Baseball Economist: The Real Game Exposed.
New York: Dutton, 2007, 336 pp.


Andrew Zimbalist [1]
Department of Economics
Smith CollegeNorthampton, Ma. 01063

Sports economics books seem to be plentiful these days.  The 2007 season brought two new monographs: Diamond Dollars: The Economics of Winning in Baseball by Vince Gennaro and The Baseball Economist: The Real Game Exposed by J.C. Bradbury.  Each attempts to tackle a distinct area within the grasp of economic analysis. 

(See J.C. Bradbury's response to this review on the Sabernomics website) 

(See Vince Genarro's response to this review on the Maple Street Press website) 

Diamond Dollars is the more ambitious of the two.  Gennaro assays nothing less than an uncovering of the mysteries of the baseball economy and purports to offer a model for small market teams to be successful.  Gennaro covers a wide range of issues, from the relationship between winning and revenues, to the value of players, the dynamics of player development, a strategy for assembling a winning team and building a team brand.

Along the way, Gennaro reveals a basic understanding of the economics of baseball and, although not a formally-trained economist himself, a reasonable understanding of rudimentary microeconomic analysis.  He addresses many disparate topics, but his core concept is the “win curve.”  While there is nothing particularly novel here, Gennaro’s presentation puts a different spin on the marginal revenue of winning.   Basically, he argues that the relevant range of wins per season is between 70 and 105.  Below 70 or above 105 wins, he asserts, there is no relationship between winning and revenues.  Within the range, there is a sweet spot between 86 and 91 wins that is the threshold for making it to the postseason, and, consequently, it is within this sweet spot that there is the highest incremental return to winning.  Making it to the playoffs, according to Gennaro, has its biggest impact by increasing a team’s revenues in succeeding years.  For teams below 70 wins, Gennaro’s thesis is that winning a few extra games brings them essentially no new revenue, meaning they have little incentive to spend on free agents, whether or not they receive transfers from the wealthy teams. 

So far, so good.  But here Gennaro hits a brick wall.  His text suggests that he has subjected his theory to rigorous modeling and testing, yet he provides the reader with next to no information on how he has executed his empirical analysis.  The few bits of explanation he does provide fail to inspire confidence.

For instance, Gennaro apparently has done some regression analysis where revenue is the dependent variable and team wins in the current and previous years are two of the arguments.  We are not informed what the other independent variables are, nor are we told whether the relationship is tested linearly, nor for what years it is tested.  Curiously, Gennaro does state that he has weighted the current and lagged team wins equally and that he has run a regression separately for each team to capture its distinct win curve.  It is not clear how many years of data he has in each team regression or why he did not instead use team dummies and interactive variables in a pooled regression to identify these effects.

Furthermore, Gennaro estimates his revenue data.  Here he makes some reasonable assumptions, but he also misses his target on some sources of revenue.  Despite these problems, Gennaro intrepidly forges ahead, glibly making specific claims about various teams’ win curves.  Unfortunately, most of the rest of Diamond Dollars suffers from similar weaknesses.

Detailed problems appear throughout the book.  Here is a small sample of these difficulties.  Gennaro does not adequately source his discussion.  The few footnotes and citations he does provide often confuse or obfuscate the matter.  He claims that he has developed a model to evaluate players’ productivity, but he neither explains the model nor does he cite the pioneering work of Gerald Scully in this field or its lineage.   Later in the book, Gennaro appears to assert authorship of the idea that baseball’s revenue sharing would be more effective if it were based on the value of a team’s market, rather than on a team’s revenue.  Yet this position has been amply discussed in the professional and journalistic literature.  Indeed, it is even incorporated into MLB’s latest collective bargaining agreement, which Gennaro entirely misses.  

Gennaro also makes inaccurate claims about financial data.  For example, he states that the NFL “generates over $2.5 billion in annual broadcast revenues” and that “about 80 percent of the NFL’s $5 billion in revenue is shared” (p. 4).  The correct numbers would be over $3.5 billion, about 70 percent, and over $6 billion.  On the next page, he writes that “$40 million from MLB’s central fund” is distributed equally to each team annually.  The actual number in the last two years has been under $30 million.  Such errors are not catastrophic, except when one tries to make detailed claims about a team’s revenue or a player’s value.

Gennaro devotes an entire chapter to teams’ player development systems.  Here too there are broad generalizations and data inaccuracies that mar his discussion.  He estimates that an average team devotes $12 million yearly to its player development system (scouting, signing bonuses, operation of minor league affiliates.)  The actual average is almost 50 percent higher.  In a footnote, however, Gennaro states that his estimate excludes international scouting and bonuses, perhaps accounting for the lower number.  Yet, it is curious why he would exclude the international aspect of player development, when today almost half of all minor leaguers come from outside the continental United States. 

One of the book’s concluding chapters is entitled “A Strategic Approach to Assembling the Roster.”  Here Gennaro uses his hidden statistical method to find that the ratio of player productivity to player salary reveals that per dollar of output pitchers cost 14 percent more than position players and that left-handed pitchers cost 17 percent more.  The inference is that team general managers should be particularly cautious in overpaying for these positions.  The important question that Gennaro does not address is that if his estimates are correct, why doesn’t the market correct itself over time?  And if the market does correct itself, what is left of his policy recommendations?  The unstartling punch line of this chapter is that low-revenue clubs can be successful by depending less on free agents and more on developing players out of their own farm system.

In his chapter on building a team brand, Gennaro offers a host of broad sweep generalizations and arbitrary weights to make standard, prosaic recommendations common to the marketing literature.  One of his more remarkable statements is found on pages 193-194.  To wit: “A team that tries to get through a season with a roster filled with fringe players and minor league prospects is testing the patience of its fans and risking its credibility.  Even the 56-win Kansas City Royals had proven major leaguers on their 2005 squad.  Matt Stairs and Terrence Long, along with their star player Mike Sweeney, complemented a host of youngsters.  For all their faults in the 2005 season, the Royals maintained the credibility and trust of their fans by not ridding themselves of Sweeney’s $11 million contract.  For the 2006 season, the Royals loaded up on mature talent with Reggie Sanders, Doug Mientkiewicz, Mark Redman, and Mark Grudzielanek, giving hope to the K.C. faithful.”  This worthy team won 62 of its 162 games in 2006. 

Gennaro’s closing chapter has some gems on the stadium economic impact literature.  On page 238, he writes: “The stadium dialogue seems to quickly degenerate into a ‘he said-she said’ by ‘greedy owners’ and ‘ungrateful municipalities’ about who gets the most benefit from a new ballpark and consequently, the appropriate mix of public versus private funding.  The two sides seem to argue so vehemently out of self-interest, citing the results of previous parks, selectively choosing the data that fits their points of view, that they neglect to get at the key issue.  ‘Do stadiums enhance the local economy?’ may be the wrong question.  The right question is ‘Under what conditions can stadiums enhance the local economy?’”  He goes on to claim that if a team plays more day games that it will help local commerce more and, therefore, cities should bargain in their lease agreements to have teams play more day games.  His discussion here is either disingenuous or completely ignorant of the academic literature on the subject of economic impact. 

In the end, Gennaro’s monograph misses its mark.  His treatment of baseball’s economic system offers little of academic value, general reader interest, or team management assistance. 

J.C. Bradbury’s The Baseball Economist is a collection of wide-ranging essays on different elements of the game that the author believes are amenable to economic or statistical analysis.  The quality of these essays is sharply uneven, with the stronger contributions related to evaluating on-field performance. His topics range from why there are no left-handed catchers, to valuing the worth of a pitching coach, whether having a strong on-deck batter actually helps the current batter or not, why there are more hit batsmen in the American League, a game theory treatment of the game’s steroid problem, assessing the role of entrepreneurial behavior in the front office, an evaluation of the competitive balance issue, an introduction to sabermetrics, how much a ballplayer is worth,  and whether MLB is  a monopoly.  Below I consider some of the collection’s high points and low points.  The latter, unfortunately, are more plentiful.

My favorite Bradbury entry convincingly attacks a longstanding baseball myth -- a strong on-deck batter helps the current batter.  Bradbury uses data from 1984-1992 to test this relationship and what he comes up with is the following: for every 100 points higher is the OPS (on-base percentage plus slugging percentage of the current batter) of the on-deck batter, the current batter will walk 2.6 percent less, will have a 1.1 percent lower batting average and will hit 3.0 percent fewer home runs.  He controls for the OPS of the current batter, the game situation, the ballpark and other factors.  Hence, Bradbury concludes that a strong on-deck batter does create an incentive for the pitcher not to walk the current batter, but it also encourages the pitcher to add focus and make tougher pitches in the strike zone, thereby lowering the current hitter’s average and power.  While these relationships are statistically significant, their actual impact is very small.  His conclusion appears solid and one wonders how long it will take before Joe Buck, Tim McCarver, Jon Miller, et al. catch on. 

Bradbury’s chapter on whether it pays for a manager to argue with the umpire is provocative, but unsatisfying.  He describes the phenomenon of a manager protesting a call as rent-seeking behavior.  The manager attempts to bully the ump, so that the ump will remember the unpleasant experience and will think twice before making another close call against the manager’s team.  Bradbury suggests that sometimes the managers succeed in this endeavor, though the statistical evidence he presents is too weak to support his claim.  It is rent seeking because there is no net gain, no output increase, just a transfer of marginal calls from one team to another.  Meanwhile, the fans, according to Bradbury, have their utility lowered because they have to spend a few extra minutes at the game due to these fits of managerial distemper.  Well maybe, but it is also possible that the fans enjoy managerial protests both because they are amusing and because it vicariously vents their own frustration at bad umpire calls.  As for a few extra minutes at the ballpark – hey, it’s baseball.

In another interesting essay, Bradbury assembles evidence that Leo Mazzone is actually a pitching coach who makes a positive difference.  Bradbury compares pitchers performance under Mazzone with their performance before and after working with him.  The evidence appears to support superior skills for Mazzone.  Bradbury also explains Mazzone’s philosophy and method.  Mazzone has now been pitching coach for the Baltimore Orioles for two years.  Perhaps it is time for corroboratory evidence. 

From here the book goes downhill.  In one chapter Bradbury discusses the presumed advantage that big city teams have.  He concludes that (p. 80): “the advantage appears to be slight and virtually meaningless.”  His argument here is sloppy.  Bradbury’s simple regression finds that variance in city size accounts for 40 percent of the variance in win percentage over a period of years.  This seems to indicate a rather substantial impact of city size.  Further, the author fails to consider the interactive effect of city size and a team owning its own regional sports channel (RSN), the number of large corporations in the market, or the size of MLB’s assigned team television market – three factors that would have reinforced the effect of city size.  Along the way, Bradbury misapprehends the functioning of the amateur draft and overlooks the unequalizing effect of the posting system with Japanese baseball.

In his chapter on what makes for an effective front office, Bradbury singles out two desiderata: having a good team on the field and having a low payroll.  Of course, all teams would like that combination, but no team can win every year on a modest payroll.  A franchise is a business and there are more factors behind whether or not it will be a successful organization, including effective promotional efforts, good relations with and involvement in the host community, charitable activities, new investments, and profitability, among others.  Bradbury then attempts to quantify team rankings by adding up the value produced by all the players on each team and subtracting team payroll, yielding his “net value of team play.”  Every team has a positive net value except his lowest ranking team, the Yankees with a negative net value of $29.8 million during 2003-05.  This anomalous result comes from the wrongheaded methodology he uses to estimate player marginal revenue product (to be discussed below) and from the narrow definition he adopts to define team success. 

His chapter on steroids in baseball employs game theory to model the choice that a player makes whether or not to indulge.  He argues that when every player chooses to use steroids it is a Nash equilibrium.  This result, however, appears to depend on his arbitrarily chosen values for the supposed productivity gain and the health costs (only $500,000) from indulgence.  Bradbury’s analysis ignores the enormous uncertainty that surrounds this choice for players.

Another chapter, “Scouts and Stat-Heads,” provides a generally useful introduction to sabermetric analysis, but Bradbury gets a bit starry-eyed over the presumed power of sabermetrics.  On page 147, for instance, Bradbury writes: “Old ways and old scouting methods may disappear, but the end result is a good one for the fan: better and cheaper baseball.”  No team is contemplating the elimination of traditional scouting methods, nor is one likely to in the future.  New statistical methods have been employed to supplement, not supplant, traditional scouting. 

Bradbury’s essay “How to Judge a Hitter or a Pitcher” also overplays the sabermetric hand.  Baseball analysts frequently refer to a statistic called hitting with “runners in scoring position” (RISP).  It is meant to represent how effective a clutch hitter a player is.  Bradbury says folderol:   “The problem is that hitting with RISP is not a skill … but a statistical anomaly.” (p. 155)  “If hitting with RISP is something a hitter can purposely alter, I have a hard time believing he is holding something back in non-RISP situations” (p. 156).  There you have it – there is no such thing as clutch hitting.  This is an awfully linear, materialist view of the world where a player’s emotions and his state of physical depletion over a 162-game season play no role.   Further, Bradbury is being inconsistent.  In his chapter about the on-deck batter, he asserted that a pitcher can ramp it up and pitch more carefully and effectively to the current batter when a strong batter is on deck.  So, in Bradbury’s world, pitchers can focus and pitch in the clutch, but hitters can’t turn the same trick.  Later in the chapter, Bradbury endorses the proposition from Moneyball that on-base percentage (OBP) is three times as important as slugging percentage (SLG).  He arrives at this outcome by running a multiple regression of runs on batting average, OBP and SLG.  The coefficient on OBP is almost three times that on SLG.  The problem here is not only that the arguments are collinear and the coefficients are less reliable, but that SLG  (it counts a homerun as four hits, a triple as three, etc.) is a much higher number than OBP.  The coefficient, therefore, will necessarily be smaller on SLG.  If elasticity is used instead of the estimated coefficient, OBP is 1.8 times greater than SLG.

Bradbury also discusses the assessment of pitching skills in this chapter.  The main argument here is that a pitcher’s ERA from one year to the next is highly variable, but that a pitcher’s walks, strikes and home runs allowed are more stable over time.  The inference is that ERA depends more on outside factors, such as a team’s fielding prowess, and, hence, is a poor measure of the inherent skills of a pitcher.  While there is something compelling to this logic, it seems caution is in order.  First, a pitcher’s skills may actually vary from year to year, along with his ERA, as other factors change, such as, his ballpark, his pitching coach, his bullpen, his team’s offense, the angle of his arm slot, his confidence level, etc.  This variability does not mean that the skill is spurious.  Second, if all we consider is strikeouts, walks and home runs, what are we saying about sinkerball pitchers who induce groundballs or pitchers who throw fastballs with movement or offspeed pitches that induce weak swings and popups?  Didn’t Bradbury already write that with a strong on-deck batter, pitchers can pitch more effectively within the strike zone? 

Next, Bradbury offers a chapter on the worth of a ballplayer.  He gets off to a bad start here by misrepresenting the functioning of the players’ market and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement.  He then misspecifies his team revenue function, leaving out RSN ownership, the number of large corporations in the host market, the size of the team’s assigned television territory, among other factors.  But the fatal problem is that Bradbury’s methodology unwittingly identifies a player’s average revenue product, not his marginal revenue product.  By his reckoning, all of a team’s revenue is attributed to the players, leaving nothing left over for front offices expenses, stadium expenses, minor league operations, or profits.  Given this misstep, it is not surprising that Bradbury finds players at all levels (under reserve, arbitration eligible and free agents) are paid less than what he estimates they are worth.

Bradbury then moves on to the baseball product market, asking “Is MLB a Monopoly?”  Bucking all scholarly analysis and legal decisions on the question, Bradbury writes (p. 201): “I’m not sure MLB is a monopoly.”  Then, in a comedy of errors, he explains his ambivalence.  He writes that Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis’ decision that baseball was not interstate commerce gave the game its antitrust exemption and that (p. 203) “the Supreme Court has upheld the Landis decision on several occasions.”  Here Bradbury is confusing two cases.  The first was a suit brought by the owners of the Federal League teams in January 1915 against baseball’s reserve clause.  This case went before Judge Landis. Landis, however, never issued a decision.  The parties settled at the end of the year.  The second was a litigation brought by the owners of the Baltimore Terrapins of the Federal League because they did not believe that the terms of the settlement were fair to their franchise.  After losing in district court (where Landis played no role), baseball appealed the decision and won.  The Terrapins then appealed before the Supreme Court, where the case was heard in April 1922.  A few months later the Supreme Court decided in baseball’s favor and the antitrust exemption was born. 

Bradbury then distorts the record further by asserting (p. 205): “At the heart of the argument that MLB acts like a monopolist is the existence of the antitrust exemption.”  He cites no sources for this claim, because there are none.  Each team sport league is a monopolist because it is the sole producer of its product and has no close substitutes.  The NFL has no blanket exemption and it is a monopoly; likewise the NBA.  Bradbury then writes referring to the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB that “each of these enjoys some antitrust exemptions for collective bargaining with labor unions ….”  Here, of course, it is not an exemption granted to the leagues, but a general statutory exemption granted to all labor unions by the Clayton Act of 1914.  Similarly, the non-statutory exemption --which enables a union to surrender certain labor market rights in exchange for other benefits in arms’ length bargaining --  applies generally to all U.S. industries.  Bradbury continues (p. 208): “There is no strong evidence that the antitrust exemption provides any monopoly privileges to MLB other than protecting it from expensive lawsuits.”  While the value of baseball’s exemption today is not what it used to be, there is still a good case to be made that MLB’s minor leagues and perhaps its amateur draft could not exist in their present form were it not for the exemption.  (This matter is actually rather complicated because any of these arrangements can be subjected to a rule of reason interpretation, balancing their pro- and anti-competitive effects.)

Bradbury’s last essay argues that the market for top-level professional baseball in the United States is contestable.  If this were true, then the earlier question about whether or not MLB is a monopoly might be moot.  Here Bradbury makes two points.  First, if there is an aspect of the industry that is not a natural monopoly and, hence, constitutes an artificial barrier to entry, it is the subsidies from local governments that teams receive for the construction of their stadiums.  But, he avers, this is not really an issue because (p. 220) “the public does not seem averse to subsidizing major sports teams from leagues other than the dominant existing league.”  It is clear that Bradbury has never been involved in starting a new or non-dominant league.  His notion that politicians are not averse to providing subsidies to teams from these upstart leagues is just plain wrong.  Second, Bradbury goes on to argue that MLB’s market is contestable.  He does this by discussing the emergence of the American Association in 1882 and the American League in 1901.  He further adduces what he erroneously calls the “Central League” (real name: the Continental League) forcing baseball to expand the number of its teams in 1961.  Leaving details aside, the difficulty with Bradbury’s claim is that the industry’s economic structure today is very different from what it was 57 or 120 years ago. 

Bradbury, then, whiffs in his effort to expand his analysis beyond the narrow confines of the baseball diamond.  After a promising beginning, The Baseball Economist fails in its intent to expose the real game.

[1] Reprinted from the Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 45, no. 4 (December 2007).

Andrew ZimbalistAndrew Zimbalist is the is the Robert A. Woods professor of economics at Smith College, and is a contributor to the Business of Sports Network. His Author Profile can be accessed here. Read interviews with Zimbalist on the current MLB Collective Bargaining Agreement, as well as an earlier interview on MLB in general.


Page 1 of 1074


Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?

Joomla extensions by Siteground Hosting