credit cards for credit scores below irs form free credit card download random number generators immediate use all bad credit card offers pre approval amazon cards against humanity rules good store credit gas cards for bad credit fake credit card numbers and security code credit card offers the best credit cards for bad credit unsecured credit cards easy best business secured credit cards gas cards for bad which is worse bad credit or no credit apply for a belk credit card security code on visa free amazon gift card generator 2014 pay wells fargo wells fargo jewelry advantage credit card payment all types of the matrix credit card reviews how to make a fake credit card number and cvv credit cards with 0 0% 0% apr for 2 years chevy chase applied bank secured credit cards real where is the mastercard security code costco american express bad credit card department store charge unsecured credit cards for bad credit aventium hsbc best buy credit card login in wells fargo free credit card generator download 4.0 capital one credit card credit score requirements apply for a 5000 credit card with bad credit opt out of american virgin airlines credit card offers 5k highest credit card limit bank of america what if i do not activate my credit card credit cards for credit scores below 2015 cls 550 easiest department store best credit card 2013 offers credit cards for really guaranteed bad credit unsecured personal loans best guaranteed secured credit cards with bad credit free cc franklin spell checker online ge money bank ge money paypal plus credit card login sears credit card yahoo customer service phone # best secured credit card best cards for bad credit 2013 valid credit card numbers with cvv for testing do store how much does paying off credit cards help credit score credit cards for people with no credit history at all good credit card best credit card offers for bad credit what the best credit easy credit card to apply for fake credit cards play play monopoly with real money citibank online visa joint credit card application fake credit card numbers that work with security code and expiration date best credit card for low income earners in india a real credit cvv penis enlargement that works valid credit card information with cvv webmd health corp apply sears capital one credit card puerto rico how to get a business credit get credit card with poor high risk unsecured credit secured credit cards to rebuild best credit cards microsoft office for small business 2013 unemployed student business credit cards instant approval fake credit card numbers that work with security code hacked credit card numbers and security codes balance transfer credit card offers for bad credit fake credit card information and number one free valid credit card with cvv super teacher fossil target credit card application free canadian guaranteed approval credit cards free paypal amazon gift card generator no survey visa credit card bad credit no deposit credit cards with low rates for cash advances high limit unsecured credit cards for bad credit free 2013 stolen credit card with cvv2 generator fake credit card numbers that have money on them status on my alaska united delta airlines credit card application guaranteed secured credit new credit cards for poor pay haband sear sears credit card online account access top secured credit how to use a credit card to build credit samsung security code number unsecured credit cards for 600 credit score valid credit card security code number bad credit loans instant decision map of australia free reloadable virtual credit cards does chase bank which banks offer secured credit cards fake working credit card numbers with security code paypal fees for ebay sellers american express for fair credit score valid security code chase verify card number free credit cards numbers that how does paypal work on ebay when selling good credit cards for people with no credit history what is the best credit card for loans for someone with no apply for home home depot credit card login payments ebay australia paypal sign in 10 best credit accepting credit cards for small business working credit cards with cvv walmart credit card numbers with cvv and exp. date o percent credit top credit cards for balance transfers free valid visa credit card information all types of matrix kohl's credit card payment online high limit credit card best credit card offers for bad credit wells fargo credit card generator 2014 download can u use horizon gold credit gift card for gas only bbva credit nlop download walmart prepaid visa debit cards green dot is home depot bk argentina argentina vs spain friendly how to get a credit card with bad credit history in australia real credit card numbers and security codes that work online 2013 itunes please enter valid security code utalk walmart at&t phone numbers customer service kmart kohl's ikea credit card application online real free valid credit card account numbers make a fake credit card number and security code easiest unsecured credit card for bad credit google play store does roku require credit card best credit cards for government small business start up loans instant approval gas capital one credit cards for bad credit list of all guaranteed instant approval bad credit credit cards
Home MLB Network / Extra Innings Extra Innings Deal Makes Poor Long-Term Business Sense

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 756 guests online

Atom RSS

Extra Innings Deal Makes Poor Long-Term Business Sense Print
User Rating: / 23
Written by Maury Brown   
Wednesday, 28 March 2007 06:21

Maury BrownYesterday saw several principle players in the Extra Innings saga testify before the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation at a hearing entitled Exclusive Sports Programming: Examining Competition and Consumer Choice. Rob Jacobson President and Chief Executive Officer for iN DEMAND Networks, Bob DuPuy President and Chief Operating Officer for Major League Baseball, Chase Carey Chief Executive Officer for DIRECTV Group, Inc., and Carl Vogel President & Vice Chairman EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. all had time at the microphone.

As the prepared statements provided here on The Biz of Baseball show, there are some key facets—namely the upcoming The Baseball Channel—that are creating the impasse on getting all the incumbents in a place to carry Extra Innings.

In a nutshell, DirecTV has offered to pay for the rights to show The Baseball Channel up-front, and now. Given the fact that ratings for NFL Network have not exactly been stellar (the heavily hyped debut game on the fledgling network pulled an averaged 4.2 million total viewers and a 2.3 household rating according to Nielsen, nearly one-third what Monday Night Football pulls on ESPN), you might understand why Robert Jacobson of iN Demand offered up a compromise deal in his opening statement. “If The Baseball Channel launches in 2009, we would give MLB the right to cancel the Extra Innings deal if it cannot reach a satisfactory agreement for carriage of the new channel with our owners,” Jacobson said. “This would put off the issue of The Baseball Channel until it actually launches and ensure that for the next two years at least, all baseball fans will have access to the Extra Innings package.”

After the statement was made, Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) asked Bob DuPuy, “"What's the matter with that?”

Well, here’s what’s the matter with that: If MLB re-negotiates with iN Demand, MLB has to renegotiate with DirecTV, and possibly EchoStar if they get onboard. The exclusive deal takes the risk off MLB and places it on DirecTV. As mentioned, if ratings for the NFL Network are not high by comparison to games shown on ESPN, how will MLB fair? After all, the NFL enjoys a vastly more popular product. Also, by DirecTV offering an up-front payment as opposed to iN Demand’s offer make The Baseball Channel available on a per subscriber basis, MLB has those funds available for any start-up costs involved in launching The Baseball Channel.

(Select Read More to view the rest of Maury Brown's article) 

Back to iN Demand, it seemed more than a bit ironic that they played themselves up as the “good guys” in this deal. After all, there are exclusive deals for cable that involve the Mets, White Sox, Padres and Phillies. As reported by Richard Sandomir of the NY Times in late February:

The owners will also have their own interests at heart. The Mets are partners in SNY with two cable operators, Time Warner and Comcast; the White Sox and Cubs are also partners with Comcast in Chicago. The Atlanta Braves are caught between being sold by Time Warner, which owns cable networks like TBS, to Liberty Media, which is taking over DirecTV.

The Padres' cable games are not licensed to satellite, so if their local fans switch to DirecTV to continue to watch Extra Innings, they will not get their own team's games unless they buy both services.

Comcast SportsNet in Philadelphia is not delivered by satellite as most regional sports networks like YES and SNY are, which leaves 300,000 or more DirecTV subscribers (at least 50 percent more than total national cable subscribership to Extra Innings) in that market without access to those cable games. Comcast's refusal to put its sports network on satellite has been challenged by DirecTV and EchoStar but affirmed by the federal government.

So, it’s not as if cable isn’t playing a roll in the exclusivity matter, as well. It should be interesting if you live in San Diego, have to watch the Padres on cable due to an exclusive deal with Cox, and you want to watch Extra Innings. In that instance, it appears you’ll have to have DirecTV, AND cable.

As for DirecTV, Chase Carey provided some analysis by dartboard. “DIRECTV estimates that there are relatively few viewers – no more than three percent of the cable segment (approximately 180,000 Extra Innings subscribers) – who cannot receive DIRECTV service,” Carey said in his opening statement. “This translates to roughly 5,000 subscribers – each of whom can access the games over the Internet.”

This is analogous to saying, “When a breeze blows through pile of leaves, 5,000 of them will be displaced.” It’s wholly arbitrary. How Carey and DirecTV came about this figure had to come with sticking their finger in the wind, but it did, none the less, create a case where the figure will be published and the myth will, in time, become engrained as revisionist history.

The other issue that got a lot of play regarded MLB’s willingness to offer a 20% ownership equity in The MLB Channel to DirecTV, while not giving this same offer to the incumbents. As Carl Vogel of EchoStar said, “However, in its entirety must be apples to apples, which will require EchoStar to acquire a pro-rata ownership of The MLB Channel,” Carey said in his opening statement. “In a letter dated March 22nd, from Major League Baseball, they state they are not in a position to offer any equity in connection with this ‘opt-in’ opportunity without DirecTV’s consent. It will be interesting to see whether that consent is forthcoming, and with what conditions, as DirecTV reconciles whether it wears its ownership hat for the MLB Channel or its hat as a competitive distributor.”

While DISH has seemed almost a secondary player in all of this, word came late yesterday by way of the Sports Business Journal, that EchoStar has offered up, what they feel, matches MLB’s terms as it pertains to financials, and distribution. For the deal to fly, EchoStar is asking for an ownership stake in The Baseball Channel, as well. The sides were reportedly mulling the offer over.

The biggest question is, what is MLB’s endgame in all of this?

As I’ve reported before, the exclusive deal does not make good long-term business sense. Limiting viewers is a poor growth model, beyond the ill-will that has been created in this process. No matter how many times you turn the deal over in your head, one asks if by not making the deal exclusive, if MLB would have come out financially in the long run.

iN Demand offered $70 million per-year in a non-exclusive arrangement. If DirecTV offered half of what they are offering in an exclusive arrangement ($50 million), MLB would come out $20 million a year ahead of where they are now, and that’s without DISH in play. Maybe it’s a matter of driving consumers to MLB.TV. After all Bob DuPuy said yesterday, “If iN Demand and Dish choose not to step up to the plate as DirecTV has done, fans will still have several options.  They can switch to DirecTV, they can subscribe to MLB.TV and watch the games on the Internet, and they can watch the roughly 400 games that every fan in every Major League market has available without the out-of-market package.” That’s convenient. MLB will pull in revenues from the displaced through their online offering. Still, is it going to be enough to offset the revenues that could have been pulled in by keeping all the incumbents in the fold?

Added to this, there is more of the “ill-will” factor as it pertains to the relationship that MLB needs to keep with cable. Is it simply not a matter of time before MLB comes to cable looking to get The MLB Channel carried?

So, to repeat, the deal makes poor long-term business sense, outside of fan ill-will.

Lastly, I should note (once again) that I’ve been a DirecTV subscriber for some time and chose to do so for reasons outside of Extra Innings. Still, I’ve subscribed to EI in the past, and will continue to do so in the future. With that, and the season on the cusp, I looked up the schedule. Sunday, there was a limited slate of games on tap. Now, DirecTV is showing a more complete slate of games to choose from. At least that’s one less matter to be critical of in what might be deemed “ExtraInningsGate”.

 Maury Brown is the founder and president of The Biz of Baseball and an author for Baseball Prospectus. He can be contacted here. 



Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?