escitalopram 10 mg lexapro ic propranolol 60 mg 50mg generic viagra erythromycin online bestellen propecia cheapest buy depression lexapro 40 mg prednisone 5 mg qualitest wellbutrin tablets mg prednisone 14 yo 75mg viagra 50mg cp sc100 viagra generic cialis 100 mg australia 40 mg lasix iv buy propecia philippines lisinopril arrow 20 mg lexapro 20 mg forum singapore online viagra lexapro buy online 200 mg wellbutrin xl purchase kamagra online lexapro 20mg phenergan 25 mg tablets cipro 500 mg 7 days medicine glucophage 500 mg celebrex generic availability xenical 120 mg posologie cialis generico culiacan doxycycline 50 mg mpc generic viagra rxmeds xenical medicine buy cipro 500mg 3 days viagra jet online genericos viagra baratos chinese viagra 800mg 2.5mg cialis online 40mg cialis cheap buy zithromax 500 mg bactrim ds 300 mg 40 mg cialis dose buy cialis re lisinopril hydrochlorothiazide 20 25 mg 100 mg of phenergan buy viagra professional order kamagra ireland order xenical us doxycycline order online 10mg of lisinopril zovirax dispersable 800 mg lasix 40 mg packungsbeilage viagra online quality levitra 20mg frankreich zoloft 50 mg pill tetracycline mk 250 mg viagra 100mg tablets 4 generic zoloft issues wellbutrin generic study diflucan 150 mg ringworm kamagra 100 mg uk wellbutrin 150mg buying viagra melbourne lisinopril 20 mg manufacturer valtrex 1000 mg tablets celebrex 200 mg directions thuoc periactin 4mg nexium 40 mg bivirkninger 40mg cialis priaprism wellbutrin canada cheap buy viagra johannesburg prednisone 40 mg pregnant prednisone 20 mg sinusitis efeitos viagra 100mg generic lexapro coupon buy kamagra liverpool chinese viagra online strattera 60 mg dosage prednisone 10 mg pack cheap strattera augmentin 625 mg uses buy clomid nolva viagra 100 mg efectos 10mg cialis take lexapro cheap online viagra online saudiarabia cheapest viagra australia buy amoxil 875 cheapest nexium buy usa strattera syrup online cialis .at online zithromax sirop 200mg generic wellbutrin pharmacy generic viagra alternative cheap propecia nz 10 mg prednisone taper propecia generico 1 mg 25mg of cialis bipolar disorder doxycycline osta cialis 5mg buy flagyl er generic valtrex rx 904 lasix 500 buy gia nexium 40mg viagra 100mg brand doxycycline generic for buy amoxil 50 mg is 40 mg cialis lasix 25mg cialis tablets 20mg nexium 40 mg oral testing generic viagra nolvadex tamoxifen 10mg prednisone online generic doxycycline hyclate 500mg cialis pills 20mg celebrex cap 200 mg zoloft pfizer generic diflucan online shopping online marketing viagra metformin generic form cipro 250 mg uses augmentin 500 mg presentacion prednisone 20mg bula cipro 1a 250 mg 40mg cialis canada celebrex 200mg coupons prednisone 5 mg 21 pack medicamento lasix 20 mg propranolol buy uk viagra online tabs doxycycline 10 mg buy celebrex tablets levitra generico effetti nexium 20mg wellbutrin 150 mg online kamagra 100mg hap 1000 mg wellbutrin brand 5 mg cialis prednisone 20 mg hives nexium purchase online australia viagra online find generic lexapro generic lexapro approval apo prednisone 5mg clomid nolvadex online administrare augmentin 625mg xenical for cheap buy kamagra shops priligy farmacia online viagra online netherlands kamagra 100mg pills priligy buy uk buy doxycycline 500 mg viagra 50 mg bijsluiter levitra 20 mg precios viagra 50 mg 4 tabletten online celebrex kamagra 100 gold 100 mg buy cheap wellbutrin buy zovirax aciclovir zoloft 30mg cytotec 2mg 5mg cialis before sublingual cialis 20 mg 50mg de clomid online zoloft wellbutrin sr 150 generic viagra shopping online 40 mg lasix furosemide using 80mg cialis xenical cheap price 1000 mg glucophage xr lisinopril 40 mg lupi precio viagra 25 mg lexapro 2.5 mg conversion cheapest 150mg. viagra order viagra professional prednisone 40 mg constipation lowest propecia 1 mg online viagra discount nolvadex 40mg tablets viagra generica 50 gramos lisinopril hctz 12.5 mg buy cialis store levitra 10 mgrs efectos cialis 5 mg augmentin bustine 400 mg clomid 50mg pregnancy order nexium 40mg ondoes levitramakeagenericline levitra buy prednisone 20mg 5 mg lexapro works zoloft 100 mg viagra 100 mg billig clomid tablets 50 mg lisinopril 10mg coupon augmentin 600 mg inj generic viagra revue generic kamagra paypal xenical buy canada cialis dose 30mg metformin 500 mg coupons cipro purchase online buy discount levitra buy strattera 60 mg cialis 5 mg cupon buy kamagra plus nolvadex online europe erythromycin 40 mg cialis 20 mg indications metformin 850 mg gewichtsabnahme female viagra 100mg xenical 120mg pcos cialis 20mg split prednisone 60mg sidefects wiki viagra generic zovirax online australia amoxil capsule 500mg buy viagra onlinereviews generic viagra 10mg levitra going generic hydrochlorothiazide generic name xenical 120 mg austria cialis 20mg schweiz zovirax uk buy 40 mg cialis diflucan generic price generic cialis prescriptions celebrex 100 mg nebenwirkungen buy viagra walgreens strattera online india nexium generic replacement cialis price online phenergan 12.5 mg levitra mg strengths 025 mg propecia generico cipro xr 1000 kamagra 100mg cheap bactrim mg available viagra kaufen 25 mg augmentin buy online diflucan philippines buy buy priligy singapore order cialis telephone doxycycline succinate 25 mg buy strattera adhd hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg price xenical 120 mg 42 tablets doxycycline 100mg gerd generica da zovirax buspar generic buy xenical turkey strattera uses 40 mg amoxil capsules 250 mg cialis 2.5 mg cost buy viagra berllino cialis 5mg usage cialis 50 mg tablets kamagra cheapest online online viagra inc discount cialis 40mg 20 mg cialis experiences doxycycline 100mg twice viagra 12.5mg effective comprare viagra generico 100mg doxycycline wound generic viagra england metformin online prescription viagra 50mg sales zithromax online usa celebrex 200 mg cost prospect augmentin 500 mg amoxil buy augmentin 500mg tab cheap 5mg cialis augmentin 625 mg wiki levitra 5mg pris levitra online fake zithromax 1000 mg uk buy cialis vegas periactin 4 mg cyproheptadine metformin hcl 500 mgs metformin 500 mg pregnancy generic cialis france cipro neurological disorders metformin pfizer 500 mg medication doxycycline 100mg tadalafila cialis 5 mg order viagra viagra taking 20mg lexapro 2 5 mg di levitra amoxil suspension 125 mg discount viagra 150 mg amoxil 875 mg generic buying viagra counter buy zithromax iv generic cialis secure glucophage 1000 mg fiyat xenical 120 mg niderlande valtrex generic cvs clomid 100mg discharge cialis marke 20mg cheapest synthetic viagra doxycycline mg malaria 1000 mg augmentin xr buy green viagra strattera generic price omeprazole 20 mg nexium clomid 25 mg online cialis online store cialis 50mg buy wellbutrin 75 mg cost propranolol er 60mg zithromax 250 mg prospecto cialis 20mg prodaja priligy 30 mg x 3 strattera 10 mg price doxycycline 100mg sti generic cialis test online viagra france le nexium 20mg buy nolvadex 20mg zoloft 50mg zithromax antibiotic1000mg cheap fast levitra gold viagra 800mg zovirax tablets 200 mg nolvadex 60mg start doxycycline 100 mg treatment generic propecia prescription lexapro 20mg price doxycycline 500 mg tablet nexium 40 mg tablets synthroid 0.125 mg 25 mg of strattera viagra 200mg india prednisone 10 mg instructions lasix 20 mg canine cialis dose 30 mg viagra buying online zovirax cream cheap generic celebrex canada buy generic wellbutrin cialis 20 mg efeitos cialis generic china clomid buy nhs lexapro 30 mg dosage buy viagra sweden nexium generic omeprazole lexapro 20 mg drowsy cialis 5 mg erfahrungsberichte zoloft 50 mg doctissimo amoxil 500 mg dosierung kamagra canada 50mg xenical en generico discount nexium online invagen generic zoloft buy cialis europe prix cialis 10 mg cytotec online canada nexium 20 mg packets buy viagra switzerland nexium esomeprazole generic periactin 4 mg uses diflucan de 150 mg metformin 500 mg packungsbeilage generic drugs lisinopril generic cialis clips glucophage xr generico cost propecia 1mg viagra onlineresources buy now viagra 8080 unbeatable cheap cialis generic 36hr cialis overnite cialis cheap viagra buy cialis generic lexapro fedex levitra 0.5 mg discreetly buying cialis lasix dog online 50mg cialis generic levitra 12 mg generic to lexapro cialis 100mg. price cialis 20mg fta 4 levitra line order hf cialis 50 mg wellbutrin xl 150 mg 30 viagra buyers srilanka preis viagra 50 mg achat cialis 20mg blueberry 100 mg viagra cialis 20mg bula losartan hydrochlorothiazide generic buy viagra 20 mg 150mg gineric viagra 60 mg nexium buy cialis urope 5mg lexapro dose viagra online legal levitra generico india lily cialis 20mg viagra soft cheap cytotec buy usa pregnant 50 mg clomid cialis 20mg axicorp nexium 40mg reacoes prohormones clomid 50 mg lexapro 70 mg reductil order xenical cheap 40mg cialis generic propecia australia buy levitra london viagra over 100 mg lasix tablet 20 mg buspar 600 mg overdose switching propecia generic cipro levaquin 500mg levitra mg 5 medicamento xenical 120mg propranolol 40mg ansiedade order lexapro discount cialis 20mg boots cialis 40 mg reviews cialis 50mg espanol viagra 100mg 8 buying viagra glasgow cialis, 40mg, india generic of glucophage cialis 20 mg torrinomedica buy levitra 100mg viagra generico europa buying cialis australia cialis 5 mg sublingual cialis generico espanha merck metformin 500 mg levitra 5mg mexico lexapro 3 mg pirple generic viagra medikament nexium 40 mg cialis 3000 mg synthroid tabs generic viagra buy sydney generic viagra bali viagra online europa cheap authentic viagra kegunaan cytotec 400 mg viagra dosage 200mg cipro 500mg 5ml doxycycline 50 mg tabs buy strattera 100mg zithromax 1000 mg daily buy lisinopril hctz precio cytotec 800 mg kamagra 100 mg contrareembolso 30 mg of lexapro prospect diflucan 50 mg viagra 200 online zoloft what mg order viagra 100 mg diflucan tablets 100mg 400mg de viagra prednisone 200 mg generic propecia buy doxycycline dci 100 mg 800 mg zovirax online buy xenical au buspar 90 mg viagra generic 2012 hsa viagra online xenical 120 mg costo preis viagra 100mg clomid online apotheek celebrex pfizer 200 mg generic cialis capsules strattera 10 mg used cheapest prednisone cialis 50mg bestellen strattera 80 mg mexico levitra 5 mg erfahrung lasix 40 mg dosierung cialis 20 mg 2 tablets buy clomid canada prix viagra 25 mg generic levitra cipla online viagra delhi cialis 5 mg indicaciones cipro siprofloksasin 500 mg zovirax suspension 200 mg phenergan liquid buy bactrim online cheap viagra generico laboratorio lasix 5 mg online buy cialis 40online valtrex generic dose cialis 40mg day zoloft 25 mgs uk generic clomid clomiphene buy levitra sydney levitra 5mg buy cialis 20mg anwendung lexapro 30 mgs
Home Pete Toms LWIB: MLB Revenue-Sharing is Bad, Plus Tidbits

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 921 guests online

Atom RSS

LWIB: MLB Revenue-Sharing is Bad, Plus Tidbits PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 07 March 2011 15:13

Last Week in Bizball by Pete Toms

This week in “Last Week in BizBall, revenue sharing is bad, plus tidbits.

REVENUE SHARING IS BAD

Last year, the “leaked financial docs” was a big story amongst us baseball biz watchers. And rightfully so. The leaked financial statements of 6 clubs (their veracity never challenged by MLB) confirmed what had been widely assumed for years. That is, revenue sharing payees’ Marlins and Pirates are profitable and the reason they are profitable is revenue sharing. This led to speculation amongst the punditry of whether the large revenue “payor” franchises would insist on a future decrease in league-wide revenue sharing. After all, the Marlins and Pirates ostensibly are in receipt of revenue sharing dollars to improve the on-field performance of their franchises. The “leaked financial docs” made it difficult for both those clubs to argue that they were using the entirety of their revenue sharing proceeds to improve their ball clubs. At the time I was one of a minority writing that the “leaked financial docs” was pretty much a non-story. While us pundits and journalists now had the “smoking gun”, certainly none of this was a surprise to any MLB owner, club president, CFO, or at the senior levels of the PA. My conclusion that this was a non-story was also informed by the public silence amongst MLB owners and front office personnel on the subject. I don’t recall anybody speaking out against the current revenue-sharing structure, particularly notable because this story afforded the perfect opportunity for “payors” to discredit the system.

But six months later, I think I got it wrong. LWIB, Red Sox owner John Henry made public that he was fined $500,000 in 09 for speaking out against revenue sharing in an interview with the Boston Globe. In that interview Mr. Henry said, “Over a billion dollars has been paid to seven chronically uncompetitive teams, five of whom have had baseball's highest operating profits. Who, except these teams, can think this is a good idea? LWIB, Mr. Henry said, "The large markets aren't allowed to give their opinions," "I made statements which turned out to be true, or at least there were various documents that were leaked after that. But anyway, the large clubs are not allowed to talk about it." Hindsight being 20-20, I’ve changed my opinion. The public silence from “payors” to the “leaked financial docs” was not a sign of tacit acceptance but instead evidence of commissioner Selig’s ability to muzzle the owners. After different comments earlier this year comparing revenue sharing to socialism/communism and challenging Rangers owner Chuck Greenberg to “get off welfare”, Yankees owner Hank Steinbrenner has also been silenced on the subject by Selig. This being a year when the CBA is set for expiration, MLB forbids owners from speaking publicly about such matters. So, the more things change….despite a decline in the amount of dollars redistributed via revenue sharing last year over 09 (approx $400 million versus approx $433 million), the large revenue owners evidently still believe the system is unfair to them.

I don’t know what amount of revenue sharing would appease the large revenue franchises and I don’t care. I’m sick of revenue sharing and have been for years. MLB would be more entertaining without it. Sadly, there has never been less reward/incentive to win games in MLB than there is today. Where is the fun in that? A long, long time ago, maximizing profits in MLB was simple, win more games. sell more tickets, beer and hot dogs. Not so much today. Win more games, sell more tickets, beer, hot dogs, sushi AND put about a third of those in a pot to share with your competitors. Plus, more and more local revenue is generated from guaranteed, long- term local TV rights deals with RSNs. That revenue is the same amount whether a club wins 62 or 102 games. Plus, MLB has centralized more and more revenue, again unrelated to club on field performance. Along with the traditional national TV contracts, increasingly lucrative digital rights are also centralized at BAM along with secondary ticketing. MLB owners each receive an equal share in the profits generated by the MLB Network cable TV channel. The value in franchise ownership is more and more frequently associated with the property development rights surrounding the ballpark, again entirely unrelated to winning.

And I don’t believe that revenue sharing is key to improving competitive balance. Before I get to why I dislike mediocrity (woops, parity, woops competitive balance) in MLB , there is no evidence that revenue sharing has resulted in more competitive balance. (The illusion of greater competitive balance in MLB is a result of the expanded playoffs and realignment) Revenue sharing is about limiting labour costs, not “hope“ for small revenue franchises. In November 09, Stanford economist Roger Noll told the Biz of Baseball:

The only way to have equally balanced teams is to ban trades and sales of players and to have periodic drafts of managers, coaches and directors of player personnel. The methods that leagues use to create balance have been shown to have little or no effect on the distribution of quality among teams. The logic behind it is that it is not in the interests of owners as well as players to have balanced competition. If all teams were of the same strength, total league revenues would go up if the best player in KC were traded for the worst player in NYC. In a regime of salary caps and no free agency, the KC owner will be richer if he sells his underpaid star to NY.

Another of the sports economists, Andrew Zimbalist (who has consulted for both the MLBPA and MLB) wrote in his 2003 book, May the Best Team Win, Baseball Economics and Public Policy:

While owners have claimed that they want more revenue sharing and a luxury tax on high payrolls in order to level the playing field, it is apparent that they are also seeking to control the growth in player salaries. Higher revenue sharing taxes lower the net marginal revenue product of players, and, other things equal, lower their salaries.

SELECT READ MORE TO SEE MORE ON MLB REVENUE SHARING, PLUS TIDBITS

 

And why should parity, ok mediocrity, amongst teams be orchestrated by MLB? While polls consistently conclude that competitive imbalance in MLB is perceived as a problem amongst fans, some academics think there is no evidence to support those findings. Another of the sports economists, Dave Berri, wrote in 07:

 

….the link between competitive balance and attendance has been extensively studied…..

And what does this literature indicate? Competitive balance does impact demand, but it doesn’t appear to be very “important.” At least, dramatic changes in balance do not seem to have a very dramatic impact on league attendance. Given this result, I am not sure the “optimal level of balance” is something leagues should actively seek…

And aren’t great teams, dynasties, more fun for fans than the annual overturn in the crop of mediocre teams qualifying for the postseason? Yankees lover or Yankees hater (the only two types of MLB fans), their run of four WS championships from 96-00 was an important factor in bringing fans back to MLB post 94. And isn’t business booming in the EPL, where both payroll and competitive disparities dwarf those in MLB?

Maybe I’m just disgruntled because the team I root for hasn’t competed in the postseason since 93. And ultimately I think the cause of that is corporate ownership that has concluded (no doubt rightfully) that the prudent approach to owning an MLB franchise is a cautious one. They understand that the central fund revenues are always there, in a down year revenue sharing will prop you up and even if you lose a little money on paper, you control a lot (162 games) of cheap programming for your cable TV sports channels. Maybe if you had to win to make money Rogers Communications Inc. would field a better baseball team. I suspect the Red Sox might be more profitable if they spent less but John Henry is more concerned with winning than profiting. Winning = profits? Not necessarily in this era. Look at the “leaked financial docs”.

TIDBITS

  • LWIB, Ben Badler at Baseball America reviewed the 2010 year in the international free agent market. Ben’s discussions with MLB international scouting directors led him to conclude that while there were no elite talents in last year’s free agent crop, there was an abundance of “mid-level” talent signed. The Jays awarded the highest bonus at $2.8 million (the fourth highest ever to an intl free agent), to Venezuelan RH Adonys Cardona. Rounding out the Top 5 signing bonuses were the Pirates ($2.6 million for RH Luis Heredia Mexico), Astros ($2.6 million for OF Ariel Ovando DR), Mariners ($2.2 million for OF Phillips Castillo DR) and A’s ($2.2 million for 3B Renato Nunez Venezuala). Excluding the burgeoning market for Cuban players, clubs doled out about $73 million in signing bonuses. Dominican players received approximately $44 million of that total, while Venezuelan players received approximately $20 million. Ben also tells us that clubs are recruiting more aggressively in Colombia.
  • The Padres recently purchased the Triple A franchise formerly located in Portland. All along the Padres plan was to eventually locate the club in the SD suburb of Escondido once a new ballpark was constructed. In the interim, the club is situated in Tucson. In order to finance the construction of the ballpark, Escondido is following the same plan that many, many other municipalities have used. That is, establishing a “redevelopment agency” (aka entertainment district) which would raise funds for the construction backed by future tax revenues generated from the development (aka Tax Increment Financing). CA governor Jerry Brown might outlaw such redevelopment agencies in his state (see Neil DeMause). LWIB, Josh Leventhal reported for Baseball America that if Escondido’s financing plan for the ballpark is scuttled by the state government, the Padres might be forced to put their Triple A franchise back on the market.
  • How would you like to watch as much of this baseball season as you possibly can, live in NYC (though I don’t know if you’d have time to leave your apartment), blog every day about it, plus vlog (a verb that I was previously unfamiliar with) and tweet and… LWIB, The Hollywood Reporter (HT Fang’s Bites) reported on a joint venture between MLB.com and Endemol to produce a web series starring the winner of the contest to be “The Biggest Geek” (my term, not theirs). Seriously, this is a great opportunity for the contest winner to launch a career as a baseball pundit/blogger/vlogger. It might also be an interesting experiment. How immersed, and for how long, can you be in a baseball season before it drives you nuts?


Pete Toms is senior writer for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?