viagra generic bulk augmentin compresse 875 mg cialis 200 mg usa strattera 10mg hinta xenical 120 mg nebenwirkungen kamagra purchase online order levitra cheap buy prescription xenical clomid 50mg miscarriage amoxil caps 500 mg mankind viagra 100mg nolvadex order kamagra 50mg netherlands indian viagra 50mg doxycycline generic alternatives glucophage 85o mg cialis 20mg vs 100 cialis 25mgs cialis 20mg 8st propecia 1 mg vs 5 levitra orodispersible 10mg viagra 100 mg costco 500 mg of viagra 50 mg prednisone siatica clomid uk buy dosage levitra 20mg nexium 40 mg controindicazioni metformin 1000 mg nebenwirkungen augmentin 625 mg alcohol levitra 20 mg time tetracycline 500 mg cap 2.5 mg lexapro nausea buy augmentin 875 mg viagra china generic propranolol mood disorders buy zithromax powder clomid online pay teva generic propecia buy viagra turky viagra 100 mg controindicazioni cialis 5mg.lilly metformin pms 500 mg buy diflucan medicine prednisone 50 mg burst farmacia online clomid cialis 5 mg somministrazione achat cialis 5mg augmentin 250 mg suspension viagra online faq guaranteed cheapest cialis beipackzettel celebrex 100mg dapoxetine 60 mg uses bactrim iv backorder cialis online billig lisinopril 40 mgs lisinopril tablet 20mg 20 ml cialis online cipro 750mg tablets generic 50 mg cialis viagra online taiwan cialis prospect 20 mg erfahrungsberichte cialis 20mg order zithromax uk bestel clomid online 100mg viagra online 10 lasix 40 mg tabletki cheap cialis singapore cialis 5 mg provato 5mg lexapro weight buy viagra gilbrata order cialis 40 mg buy zithromax generic periactin online prednisone 20mg earache clomid de 100mg propecia buy london viagra genericcanada cialis online overnight propranolol 40 mg tablets buy viagra dapoxetine lexapro cheapest augmentin 625mg pl kamagra jel buy viagra cheapest price online doxycycline 100mg cialis online online viagra generico normon viagra 25 mg compresse lexapro generic reviews viagra generico forum amoxil dosage 400 mg generico cipro 500 online prescription viagra propranolol 40 mg engorda 10mg prednisone 4 time doxycycline 400 mg nexium 40mg preco cipro seizure disorder cialis 40 cheap prezzo viagra 50 mg generic cialis, 5 mg nexium mups 20 mg buying clomid review generic zoloft costs viagra 50 mg faydasi buy zithromax 250mg amoxil 500 mg posologia generic viagra 500mg cialis prezzo 5 mg prednisone 10 mg online doxycycline 100mg 7 days glucophage ftbl 1000mg take 2 cialis 5 mg prednisone 50 mg10 days generic viagra without ip generics cialis 10mg viagra work 40mg of cialis clomid cycle 2 100 mg viagra 25 mg durata wellbutrin 600 mg daily composition cialis 20 mg nexium 40mg usa nexium dr 20 mg 5 or 1 mg propecia prednisone online book apo propranolol 10 mg awp cialis 20mg cialis 10mg euroclinic kamagra 800 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg hp 47 prednisone 20 mg sciatica cialis generic info viagra online schnell phenergan 25 mg pr xenical 120mg kamagra cheapest online viagra 12mg viagra 100mg compare viagra generic purchase cialis cheaper harga cialis 100 mg buy tadalafil cialis doxycycline dogs mg generico de viagra safe cialis generic cialis 20mg nebenwirkung augmentin 250 mg szirup lexapro headache 20 mg kamagra online ireland 100mg clomid pcos buy nolvadex eu lexapro tem generico nexium 60 mg capsule augmentin susp 400 mg cialis 5 mg acquisto cipro tablets 500mg levitra 20 mg funziona cialis 2,5 mg kopen clomid 50mg 5 9 twins propecia generic equivalent kamagra 100mg information propecia online pharmacy prednisone generic name cialis 5mg sale lisinopril 10 mg pill amoxil 500mg expiration online cialis legal cost 200 mg celebrex online cialis legit order cialis discount prednisone 50 mg migraine buy viagra melboure generic viagra express metformin 500mg buy viagra seoul priligy 60mg uk clomid mood disorders trusted viagra online cialis generic cilpa buy strattera europe celebrex bipolar disorder 180 cialis 5mg cialis 2.5mg reviews prednisone prednisolone 5mg cialis 10 mg tablets priligy venta online viagra mg 50 preco levitra generico cialis 2.5 mg testimonios thuoc xenical 120mg valtrex generic canadian kamagra 200mg cena instant cheapest viagra generic name celebrex levitra 40 mg review much generic propecia bactrim 50 mg doxycycline 50mg buy 100mg viagra sale cialis 10mg notice viagra online sydney levitra generic usa augmentin 457 mg dawkowanie malaysia nexium generic lexapro online prescription generic levitra review generic levitra problem 50 mg viagra generic zithromax 200 mg using 100mg wellbutrin pills cialis online bestellen levitra 10 mg n3 cheapr viagra 50 0.088 mg synthroid metformin 500 mg preise cheapest uk propecia celebrex online shopping viagra generic toronto lasix 12.5 mg price valtrex generic equivalent 80 mg nexium dosage viagra generetic 25 mg cialis mg 5 costo strattera buy prescription 37.5mg wellbutrin diflucan 200mg notice lexapro tabletas generico synthroid 0.125 mg tablet cialis generic experience kamagra generic uk starting zoloft 12.5 mg generic cialis philippines viagra 12.5mg cheap lexapro order kemasan cialis 80mg zithromax 250mg pfizer uk viagra generic cialis 20 mg ndc manila viagra buy 5 mg lexapro therapeutic cialis online europa 100mg de viagra price lisinopril 100mg zoloft 100 mg alcohol generic valtrex cheapest v cipro 500 mg prednisone 80 mg buy viagra etc augmentin 250 mg siroop levitra 10 mg halbieren doxycycline 100mg webmd order cialis here zoloft 25 mg daily levitra 10mg murah buy pink cialis 250 mg cipro uti jual kamagra online cheap kamagra nyc bugiardino cialis 5 mg generico viagra nome cialis 20 mg headache buy lisinopril london top generic cialis wellbutrin xl 15 mg iui clomid 50mg viagra plus 100 mg nexium 40mg pret augmentin bid 625 mg holland buy viagra propranolol generic for doxycycline dosage 200 mg vegetal viagra 600mg doxycycline 100mg uses doxycycline sandoz 100 mg xenical online forum nexium 40 mg venezuela viagra 20mg wirkung paypal generic cialis lisinopril teva 5 mg diflucan 10 cps 100 mg zoloft generic image cialis 10 ou 20mg nexium 40 mg medication order doxycycline online clomid dosage mg lisinopril 2.5mg wikipedia cialis 5 mg pricing dapoxetine 60mg price prednisone 20 mg online buy levitra netherlands doxycycline 100mg posologia lasix furosemide order online viagra purchase wellbutrin 150 mg costo generic lexapro 2011 viagra pills online cheap augmentin online zithromax 300 mg syrup getting viagra online buy doxycycline 100 mg 2 buy cialis arizona buy kamagra jelly levitra 30mg buy cialis 40mg lasix 500 mg uae phenergan 25 mg directions levitra 20 mg vidal generic substitute strattera 20mg lexapro price bactrim 400 mg tablet cheap viagra philippines tablets cialis 80 mg 200 mg of phenergan lexapro generic escitalopram kamagra paypal cheap doxycycline 50mg generic precios levitra 10 mg lisinopril 20 mg ratiopharm xenical online cheap buy lexapro online strattera 40 mg adderall propecia generic purchase generic celebrex tarif levitra 20 mg buy viagra liverpool nexium 20 mg dose generic finasteride finpecia lasix 25 mg levitra 200mg walgreens lexapro generics problems kemasan cialis 20mg lexapro generic substitute prednisone online prescription doxycycline 100 mg gonorrhea cipro overdose 1000mg nombre generico strattera order Levitra 10mg prices cialis 5mg achat viagra generic lisinopril 20 mg lupin cialis 20 mg biverkningar online doxycycline 50mg cialis 20 mg ecuador augmentin 125 mg posologie cialis 2.5mg 5 mg cialis 40mg took buy research nolvadex australian nolvadex 600mg buy valtrex overnight lisinopril manufacturers 40 mg xenical online malaysia strattera 18 mg nedir comprare nolvadex online clomid 50mg information buy cytotec misoprostol zoloft 100mg online apotheke strattera safely order viagra propranolol 50 mg nexium generic lansoprazole levitra 20 mg hinta nexium 10 mg prospecto pfizer celebrex 200mg levitra 30 mg dose zovirax 500 mg neo doxycycline 100mg prednisone 20 mg to 10 cialis 20mg milinda buy canadian synthroid australian online cialis generic viagra 25mg medicament celebrex 200mg cheapest kamagra 50mg cheap clomid resources buy cytotec australia viagra says 600mg zovirax 500mg tablet zoloft 50 mg costo nolvadex 20 mg generic clomid 100 mg bodybuilding t.metformin 500 mg viagra 100mg efekt augmentin tablets 500 mg cialis buy 36 zithromax clinic buy to buy kamagra viagra online tips 10 mg prednisone dosage viagra mg 200 nexium online price nexium tabletas 40 mg lasix 400 mg celebrex 60 mg lexapro liver disorder cialis 100 mg pills viagra 200mg uk 25 mg phenergan tablets harga erythromycin 500 mg buy clomid 200mg thuoc glucophage 500 mg order dapoxetine online glucophage buy cheap viagra 25mg duree finasteride 5 mg propecia lexapro generic use forum cialis 10 mg recreational cialis 5 mg erythromycin 400 mg synthroid dosage .125 mg zithromax 250 mg hinta viagra 400mg pri xenical 120 mg bivirkninger order levitra women strattera 10 mg review buy prednisone prednisolone 10 mg cialis capsules clomid sales online diflucan 150 mg controindicazioni nexium online pharmacy 250 mg of valtrex remedio cialis 20mg valtrex generic release metformin 500mg sweeting doxycycline 20 mg cost buy doxycycline acne cialis 20mg specifications metformin pcos online buy lexapro 10 mg cialis 5mg dose cialis generico feminino achat viagra 25mg viagra 150 mg wiki cialis 5 mg benefits cialis 20 mg walgreens amoxil 500 mg uti lisinopril 40 mg tablet 4214 viagra in canadgeneric 8 mg periactin 40 mg cialis effects generic augmentin dosage wellbutrin borderline cheapest viagra net propecia shampoo buy cialis online prescription buy serm clomid periactin 4 mg compresse cipro basics 500 mg buy doxycycline powder paypal viagra online columbian viagra generic online clomid uk nexium 20 mg einnahme buy zithromax packet strattera 18 mg uk metformin xr 850 mg 75 mg of synthroid two 50mg viagra lexapro tablets 10mg xenical 120 mg hartkapseln zithromax cheap online orlistat alli online lisinopril 40mg online 20 mg lisinopril hctz generic zoloft coupon metformin 500 mg mylan viagra pret 25 mg zithromax buy cipro 750 mg 14 tb buy brand nexium 100mg clomid bloating buy wellbutrin sr 150 propecia 5 or 1mg diflucan pill 100mg erfahrungsbericht levitra 10mg starting lexapro 5 mg compra viagra online viagra canada online propranolol x 40 mg viagra online johannesburg viagra 100 mg 8 generic lexapro pharmacy amoxil capsules 250mg mexican generic cialis doxycycline rosacea 100 mg erfahrung levitra 10mg lexapro 10 mg bijwerkingen cialis generic 40 mg doxycycline 100mg zon cheapest propecia buy wikipedia cialis 5mg buy cheap diflucan cheap free viagra cialis dosage 50mg nexium oral 10 mg lexapro generic dosing viagra cialis 200mg buy liquid prednisone propecia 1 mg generic 100
Home Pete Toms MLB Network Vs. Other League Networks

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1575 guests online

Atom RSS

MLB Network Vs. Other League Networks PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 24
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Friday, 04 December 2009 12:36

MLB NetworkOn January 1st of this year, MLB became the last of the “Big 4” to launch their own TV channel with the debut of MLB Network (MLBN). The initial year of MLBN has been deemed a success by MLB officials. The channel debuted in 50 million plus homes (a record launch for a cable channel), ad revenues were reportedly strong (given the recession) and the programming received positive reviews (the addition of Bob Costas gave the channel’s journalistic credibility a major boost).

But what is the future of league owned networks? MLB’s rights deals with all three of their national TV partners (Fox, TBS and ESPN) expire in 2013. Those deals pay MLB upwards of $650 million per year. All of the “big 4” (most notably MLB and the NFL) must balance the enormous value of their national TV deals against the challenge of growing the revenues of their own channels. In a nutshell, the leagues have become competitors with their broadcast partners. Neal Pilson, former president of CBS Sports, was quoted in a recent Los Angeles Times piece by Jon Weinbach titled, “Sports league cable networks play a dangerous game”, (Leagues) "have to be aware of -- and careful not to kill -- their golden goose, What is the endgame?" In a March 2008 Q&A with The SportsBusiness Journal, Fox Sports Chairman David Hill addressed the relationship between league owned networks and their broadcast partners:

Do you see any new models in terms of how networks deal with the leagues beyond right fees?
Hill: Who knows? The modeling might change. The modeling might remain the same. I don’t know. But it’s going to be a sad day for the leagues if the current model disappears. It would require a lot of late nights on Park Avenue, with the lights burning to try and figure out what their economic structure looks like without the networks.

So then why are leagues launching NFL Network and MLB Channel to compete with you?
Hill: What’s the financial viability of the NFL Network? Do you think the NFL is going to say to the networks, “See you later. We’re going to go make our money off of the NFL Network”?

If we’re talking about 20 years, yeah, I can see that as an end goal.
Hill: It could well be in 20 years, but certainly not in the next decade. Same thing with MLB Network. Talk to David Stern. He’s had NBA Network going for what, 15 years now?

In the present, how important are these league owned cable channels? There are approximately 115 million TV households in the US. MLBN and NFL Network (easily the most widely distributed of the “big 4” channels) are available in approximately 53 million of those homes. The NFL Network launched in 2003 and only this season achieved the same level of distribution as MLBN. (more on that below) By comparison, ESPN is available in approximately 99 million homes.  Last month, The SportsBusiness Journal quoted Comcast Programming Group President Jeff Shell, “The amount of money each of the leagues is making from their network is de minimis compared to the amount of money we’re all paying for rights,…” Jon Weinbach reported in his aforementioned piece, “Networks with fewer than 70 million subscribers are generally not considered "national buys" by advertising agencies, and therefore can't generate premium rates for commercials.”

If the league owned cable channels are relatively minor players today, is that set to change in the near future? There has been much speculation that the “big 4” are concerned about the increasing dominance of ESPN in the sports TV marketplace and that the league owned channels are necessary to protect the future value of broadcast rights. Over the air broadcasters have concluded that their “ad based” model can no longer compete with the “dual revenue” (ads and carriage fees) model of cable TV. As a result, the over the air broadcasters are negotiating with cable operators over compensation for the “retransmission rights” to their local stations. In some markets, broadcasters have even threatened to “pull“ their local stations from the cable operator over “retransmission fees”. ESPN receives a monthly subscriber fee from cable operators and sat providers of upwards of $4. That before they sell a single ad. John Ourand reported last month in The Sports Business Journal:

The debate over retransmission rights — where broadcasters want cable operators to pay cash to carry their local stations — will be one of the most closely watched issues over the next year, as the two sides try to determine how high the monthly “retrans fee” should be

It’s not a stretch to suggest that the long-term future of broadcast networks as pivotal players in televised sports is at stake. If broadcasters somehow don’t add dollars to their coffers, the likelihood of big payouts during the next round of major sports TV negotiations from 2011 to 2013, which include the NFL, MLB and NHL, seems remote.

Tom Van Riper reported last month for Forbes:

The most obvious advantage to starting your own programming arm: controlling the pipeline through which your product goes out. Baseball's rights deals with ESPN and Fox both expire after the 2013 season. With new agreements to be negotiated, what's better leverage than having the option to tell a potential network partner that you can put the games on the air yourself if the price isn't right?

"You want to become a content provider, because you never know what the future holds," says Lee Berke, a New York-based sports media consultant.

Last month, John Ourand and Tripp Mickle of The SportsBusiness Journal filed a report titled Are leagues only potential ESPN rival?”from the Sports Media & Technology conference.

The sports industry continues to look for a competitor to step up and compete with ESPN, and the consensus at an industry conference last week is that only one group is poised to pose an actual threat to the sports media giant: the leagues.

The majority of attendees at last week’s conference said they believed league-owned networks were most likely to compete with ESPN.

In the same report, Dick Ebersol, Chairman NBC Sports & Olympics, remarked on the “dual revenue” advantage that ESPN has over the over the air broadcasters:

“No one in the history of media has ever opened up the new year every year knowing they have $5 billion sitting over there on the side of the room,” he said. “So anything ESPN wants, ESPN can have. Now whether that’s healthy in the long run for every sports property in America, you decide — because at a certain point in time, all of us will be out of business, and then they’ll only be there to deal with everybody, and I don’t believe the goodness of their heart is better than the goodness of anyone’s heart in this room in a situation like that.”

No doubt the “Big 4” are extremely happy about the merger of the nation’s largest cable provider Comcast with NBC Universal. Long rumoured, the deal has the potential to turn Comcast’s sports channel “Versus” into a worthy rival to ESPN. (see The Biz of Hockey report, NBCU & VERSUS: An Alternative to ESPN?) Although regulatory approval of the merger is expected to take at least a year and likely more, the impact on the sports broadcast industry is potentially huge. Earlier this week Richard Sandomir reported in The New York Times:

Comcast would have to decide to spend what is necessary to lure viewers from ESPN and ESPN2 by acquiring bigger events, like the Olympics, Major League Baseball, the N.F.L., Nascar and the N.B.A. — properties on a tier above its current rights to IndyCar, the Professional Bull Riders, Mountain West Conference football and mixed martial arts.

AND

So, if Comcast is serious financially and qualitatively, it and NBC could turn Versus into a credible rival. It could turn Versus into a network that would provide cable operators (like Comcast) leverage in negotiations with ESPN.

It might also make leagues giddy, knowing they could potentially juggle large-scale bids from Versus.

“You can see that the leagues must be concerned about the next round of negotiations,” said Randy Falco, the former president of the NBC Universal Television Group. “They’re asking, ‘Where’s the money coming from?’ Less and less over the next 10 years will it come from the broadcast networks, so they’re looking for an alternative.”

In the immediate future, the league owned cable channels will attempt to add subscribers, which in turn boosts ad revenues. Adding subscribers has proven a difficult challenge for the league owned channels. Cable operators have been pushing back against the rising cost of sports programming with lengthy battles ensuing over the relegation of sports channels to “sports tiers” as opposed to the more deeply penetrated “basic tiers”. The NFL and MLB have opted for different approaches in their negotiations with cable and sat providers.

As previously noted, NFL Network only reached the same level of distribution as MLBN this season, despite launching six years earlier. Despite the relatively minor availability of the channel, in 2006 the NFL gave their network the sole right to broadcast 8 regular season games. (Played on a Thursday or Saturday) The league reportedly rejected a $400 million plus offer from Comcast for the 8 game package, convinced that demand for the games would incite fans to pressure their cable providers to add NFL Network to their line ups. Comcast (the nation’s largest cable provider) responded by moving the channel to a more expensive and less penetrated “tier”. A court battle and bitter public relations campaign ensued until this season when the two sides came to an agreement. A resolution was reached as a result of the NFL lowering their carriage fee for the channel and the launch of the NFL’s RedZone channel, a companion “Sunday look in” product tailored to the “fantasy” fan. Cable operators had long argued that DirecTV had an unfair advantage in programming the NFL as the exclusive provider of “Sunday Ticket”, long a hit with “fantasy” fans. The new agreement has resulted in an additional 11 million subscribers for NFL Network, 53 million as opposed to 42 million last season.

Select Read More to see why MLB Network's model has been a success compared to other league-owned networks

MLB was able to launch MLBN in 53 million homes because they made many of the biggest cable and sat providers partners in the channel. The cable operators are obviously more motivated to program MLBN on their most popular services if they own a stake in the channel. (The NFL long argued that Comcast gave preferential treatment to sports channels that they own. I.E. The Golf Channel) MLB also made their popular out of market “Extra Innings” package available to their MLBN partners. (similar to the NFL’s recent introduction of “RedZone”) Last month, Stuart Miller reported for Multichannel News:

MLB Network, the latest entrant among the bunch, took a distinctive path to gaining distribution, selling minority ownership stakes to some of the biggest players in the game: Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications and DirecTV. Thanks to this tactic, the big leagues' network launched last January in a record 53 million homes — roughly half the TV universe. (The network also tied carriage to its out-of-market “MLB Extra Innings” package.)

“We feel really good about where we are,” said network president Tony Petitti, who credits MLB's executive vice president of business, Tim Brosnan, with the plan.

That's because in one year, MLB caught up to NFL Network, also in 53 million homes, even though the gridiron channel has been around since 2003.

Lee Berke, a sports media consultant, spoke with Tom Van Riper for the aforementioned Forbes report:

He likes MLB Network's strategy of avoiding its cable carriers' premium tiers, going for wide distribution over greater revenue per subscriber. The network debuted to a potential audience of 50 million homes in January 2009, many more than its NFL and NBA counterparts……

"A subscription service that gets $5 or $10 a channel might get only 10 million homes," says Berke. "Better to be in 50 million homes, that's how you maximize affiliate [advertising] revenue." Advertisers like predictability--knowing roughly how many viewers comprise the audience. Staying off premium channels greatly reduces the audience churn rate: People come and go from premium services all the time, while most everyone sticks with the basic services.

In fairness to the NFL, which has been widely criticized in the sports media for mishandling negotiations with the cable and sat industry over distribution of their channel, they are now in the same number of homes as MLBN. But, NFL Network charges double the carriage fee of MLBN (reportedly approx. $0.50 per sub compared to approx. $0.24 per sub) and they have not given up 1/3 of the equity in their channel to cable and satellite.

Ultimately, the league owned channels best opportunity to increase subscribers lies in increasing the number of live games they broadcast. MLBN has plans to broadcast more live games next season. Whether or not the leagues are cannibalizing the existing value of this programming to RSNs and national TV partners is a matter of debate. From Jon Weinbach’s aforementioned piece in the Los Angeles Times:

"League offices have an unhealthy belief that viewers, consumers and distributors want more of their product," said one veteran cable executive, who declined to be identified because his network is in business with all of the leagues. It’s going to be interesting to see over time how they manage that contradiction and how they manage a fair bidding process when the auctioneer is one of the bidders.”

Tim Brosnan, MLB’s Executive Vice President, Business commented last month in the SportsBusiness Journal on the subject of programming more live games on MLBN (Mr. Brosnan is credited with leading MLB’s successful negotiations with cable and sat during the MLBN launch):

MLB executives are quick to acknowledge the power of live MLB games as the surest way to expand the network. Last season, the MLB Network carried more than 50 live MLB games.

“We know from the cable networks and the broadcast networks in the sports business, it’s live events that really draw the customers in,” Brosnan said. “You can make a lot of money on syndicated shows and talk and highlights. But you draw bigger audiences on events.”

Still, Brosnan said MLB is not close to making a decision on whether to add to the channel’s live game schedule when the league’s TV contracts with ESPN, Fox and TBS end in 2013. “The biggest decisions that are going to have to be made in our industry as it relates to MLB Network is the depth and level of events that we put on our air,” he said.

Beyond building equity and reaping operating profits from these channels, there are ancillary benefits for the leagues. MLB uses MLBN to promote the WBC and the amateur draft (MLB has long sought the media attention that the drafts in the other “stick and ball” leagues generate). The NFL Network has generated significant interest in broadcasting the “scouting combine”, which ties in with promotion of the already wildly popular NFL draft.

If there is concern amongst distributors, programmers, leagues and fans that there is too much sports on television, it might be premature. Yes, the recession might be keeping more fans in front of their sets but the TV audience numbers for NFL games this season are still astounding. Yes, the Yankees were in the World Series for the first time since 2003 and there were many thrilling postseason contests but still, the TV audience numbers for the MLB playoffs were enormous. A lacklustre MLB regular season (lack of compelling playoff races), resulted in diminished ratings for FOX and ESPN while TBS ratings were stable. Perhaps more importantly, RSN ratings for regular season baseball were stable (albeit interpretation of those numbers on a macro level are made more difficult because ratings are directly tied to team performance). Going forward, whether or not broadcast networks remain a major player in TV sports, or whether or not Versus steps up to increase demand for sports programming, or whether or not the league owned networks become increasingly important, remains to be seen. What we do know is that in this era of audience fragmentation, DVRs, video games, internet and social networking, live sports remains one of the last (THE last?) media properties capable of delivering a mass audience. The last word from the aforementioned report from Multichannel News:

Most sports attract loyal viewers, mostly men in crucial demographics, and have the potential to draw big TV crowds. Live professional sports programming, especially in high definition, is the ultimate penetration driver, said Tennis Channel CEO Ken Solomon.

“It's the one thing in television that continues to defy ratings gravity,” he said.


OTHER NEWS FROM THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK

(THE BIZ OF FOOTBALL)

(THE BIZ OF HOCKEY)

(THE BIZ OF BASKETBALL)

(SPORTS BASH)


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?