buy lexapro colombia lasix 120 mg iv buy viagra poland 37 mg zoloft generic cialis houston mylan generic wellbutrin generic nexium mexico generic viagra sub diflucan dosage 200 mg 6generic levitra cheap viagra buy edmonton lexapro 20mg zoloft 250 mg of phenergan phenergan 25 mg cmi doxycycline generic names buy cipro 2250 mg metformin doxycycline 100mg 3142 viagra suppositories buy nexium 20mg buy prednisone 10 mg uses propranolol online uk cialis online apotheke lexapro 20 mg headaches prednisone 1mg clomid de 100 mg fungsi nexium 20 mg buy viagra caverta viagra online sites doxycycline online buy original lexapro cialis cheap taking 2 500mg metformin 3mg cialis cialis 20mg reviews synthroid dosage .05 mg lisinopril 10 mg eon erythromycin ethylsuccinate 800 mg doxycycline buying online cialis commercial online sales cheap viagra nexium canada buy cialis tadalafil 100 mg nebenwirkungen lisinopril 10 mg nolvadex 10 mg dejstvo cheap kamagra 50mg cipro 500 mg online nexium 20 mg capsule dogs prednisone 60 mg cialis 100 mg overnight viagra buy singapore cytotec misoprostol online buying clomid nolvadex health online viagra generic india levitra cialis 10mg 48 zovirax 50 mg creme kamagra 100mg women online zovirax sale viagra generic cheap prednisone 20mg pregnant doxycycline 100 mg palu 100mg viagra dosage prednisone 10 mg espanol nexium 20mg tabletten order some viagra boots buy viagra clomid pcos 50mg diflucan da 100 mg nexium mups 10mg paris buy viagra 100mg strattera diflucan mgs cialis de 0,5 mg generic viagra uae dubai buy viagra buy overseas viagra 100 viagra 100mg cheap levitra 10mg works buy viagra georgia generico do cialis levitra 10mg price cialis 50mg india 10mg levitra reviews cheap real viagra 2 mg cialis xenical 120mg reviews lisinopril tabs 40mg propecia online kupovina buy buspar online 2.5 cialis cheap nexium capsules 40 mg cialis 5 mg works cheapest online cipro cialis 2,5mg paypal nexium 40mg tablets allergic generic wellbutrin glucophage generico cheap blue kamagra cialis 20mg spanje cialis 2mg propranolol 40mg lch viagra generic medications cialis 5mg deals wellbutrin generic effective levitra 10 mg fiyatlari doxycycline 20mg tab lexapro 5mg alcohol ubat clomid 50mg generic cialis overnigh xenical 125mg medicamento levitra 5 mg clomid 100 mg statistics metformin 500 mg identification cialis online prescriptions blue lisinopril generic viagra buy ireland nolvadex uk buy generico de bactrim cipro xr 750mg strattera hoeveel mg buy viagra spain cipro 5oo mg cialis tadalafila 20mg tablet metformin 850 mg female dapoxetine 30mg purchase Levitra 20 mg nolvadex o generico cialis generic equivalent viagra mg sizes synthroid .5mg clomid online nz strattera 10 mg generic generic for glucophage 10 100 mg clomid pills clomid cheap 100 prospecto viagra 25 mg generics24 cialis zoloft online consultation active viagra cheap ordering doxycycline antibiotics order cialis 5 mg cialis 20mg marseille lexapro buy generic cialis manipulado 10 mg cheap 5m cialis acquisto cialis 20 mg 2.5 mgs lexapro cost lexapro 20 mg 10 mg ml tetracycline buy priligy paypal prednisone 60 mg 5 days cialis 5 or 10mg propecia cena 1mg buy cipro france dog cipro online generic propecia 2013 buy doxycycline generic 10 mg prednisone high doxycycline 100mg skin prednisone 500 mg uses wellbutrin xl 150 mg cipro 500mg treats werking cialis 20mg online cialis genuine buying cialis forums viagra online ontario clomid 100mg round 2 buy metformin usa 20mg of lexapro cheap viagra 150 mgs buy wellbutrin sr lexapro generic whirte cialis medistar. 25mg. viagra online leagle levitra 120 pills online take 2 20 mg levitra cialis 20mg opinie generic zithromax 500mg ubat metformin 500 mg tadafil cialis 50mg generic valtrex cheap viagra online cz order lexapro uk 10mg lexapro elderly price levitra 20 mg 100mg clomid ovulation celebrex 200 mg francais viagra c5 generic thuoc augmentin 875 mg cialis liquid buy prednisone 5mg 5ml priligy 30mg doxycycline 100 mg bijwerkingen generic levitra otc zovirax 200mg dose viagra online tesco valtrex 500mg preis viagra 10mg online cialis order online comprar cialis online viagra online stockists dapoxetine 20 mg cialis 20mg doseage cialis 20 mg buy cialis 100mg. online buy 150mg viagra everyday generic cialis buy celebrex overnight celebrex 200 mg anwendungsgebiete viagra online 25 mg conditionnement cialis 10mg clomid 50mg 2012 lisinopril online canadian viagra 30 pills 100 mg glucophage hcl 500mg generic levitra effective zoloft sertraline 50 mg 120mg viagra cialis dosage mg buy viagra shipping viagra 25mg polska propecia .5mg 2013 teva prednisone 50 mg generico de cipro clomid 300 mg la viagra generica wellbutrin generic budeprion lisinopril 20 mg prescription acheter levitra 20 mg mylan nolvadex buy prednisone 5mg constipation amoxil 500 mg posologie kamagra viagra 100mg buy nolvadex 2013 bulk cheap viagra clomid 50mg days canadian generic viagra viagra anavar online zithromax sirop300mg wellbutrin 300 mg tablets locate generic cialis 150 mg zoloft pregnant viagra generico 25 50mg clomid pcos buy viagra newcastle gebruiksaanwijzing viagra 100mg viagra stood online diflucan 100 mg cost metformin backorder priligy 60 mg fiyati viagra wholesale buy cost cialis 5 mg generico di zovirax celebrex 5 mg valtrex generic walmart incredibly cheap viagra order wellbutrin sr lisinopril 20mg price took levitra 10mg viagra 100 mg 100 pills lexapro 5mg week 3 celebrex 250 mg dosage buying brand viagra synthroid generic cost nexium 40mg yanetkileri generic lexapro order buying cialis overseas prednisone 5mg sales nexium 20 mg dosierung celebrex 100mg wiki zithromax 500mg preis valtrex mgs precio viagra 100mg nexium 40mg indicacoes nexium coupons online viagra condoms online 50 mg prednisone asthma cialis prise 200mg buy legit viagra propecia online recommendations online cialis forum propranolol inderal 40mg metformin 500 mg uses zithromax 1200 mg daily valtrex online prednisone 20 mg walmart fast online viagra viagra 150 mg prices lexapro generico confiavel cialis 20mg 12 st buy viagra 25 mg viagra very cheap viagra 100mg box strattera 100mg costo 10 mg prednisone dogs cheap viagra generica buy synthroid generic viagra strips 25 mg viagra generic .net zovirax 200 mg cena generic cialis trial nexium mups 40 mgs cialis tablets buy cheapest cialis super lisinopril 40 mg espanol lexapro 10 mg directions kuwait buying viagra glucophage 500 mg tabletas diflucan cpr 100 mg 50 mg viagra instructions 5mg lexapro affair generic valtrex 2011 clomid 3000mg order diflucan overnight online viagra free cialis online paysafe erythromycin goi 250mg online cialis soft buy kamagra 50 to buy cialis valtrex 800 mg authentic generic cialis generic viagra yet controindicazioni cialis generico bijsluiter glucophage 850 mg buy strattera 100 mg fungsi augmentin 625mg cialis online walgreens kamagra 100mg online medicament zoloft 50mg zovirax 800 mg uk metformin atid 850 mg diflucan 150 mg prospect buy cialis cyprus metformin 500 mg sandoz buy viagra philippines generico viagra funziona canadian dapoxetine online metformin 800mg viagra 0.25 mg forum golden viagra 3800 mg nexium 20 mg cp medicamento propranolol 40 mg cheap lisinopril 40 mg propecia 4mg cialis 20 mg work augmentin suspension 125 mg wellbutrin 200 mg cytotec 200mg online celebrex tablets 100mg generic online viagra generic zithromax 1g pastilla nexium 40 mg nexium pills online nexium generic 2011 generic viagra usps comprare propecia online metformin 500 mg works buy bactrim pharmacy levitra 20 mg posologie viagra 50mg pills drug lasix 40 mg lisinopril 20 mg 12.5 mg valtrex online cheap prednisone 120 mg order cheap kamagra clomid online prescriptions propranolol to buy generic levitra problems generic cialis 40 cheap levitra 5 mg cost generic lexapro appetite augmentin 1000 mg etkisi cialis 20 mg nasil best online propecia super kamagra 160mg zoloft 5 omg buy 2.5 mg cialis cialis 5 mg recensioni cialis 20 mg faq lexapro 20 mg 90 day obat zithromax 500 mg cytotec de 500 mg viagra 50 mg packungsbeilage cialis black mg glucophage xp 750mg online recept viagra celebrex 400mg dosage durata cialis 20 mg glucophage online prescription cialis 100mg30 tablets viagra 100mg cut buy viagra montreal levitra uk cheap doxycycline my 100mg viagra 50 mg efectos buy propecia pills posologie clomid 100 mg cheap pill viagra generic tetracycline 500mg cialis 200mg review Cialis 10mg 20 Tabs strattera 40 mg adults posologia cialis 10 mg prednisone 20mg mylan kamagra 100mg wikipedia cialis onlinepaypal cheapest cialis edrugstore buy metformin 1000mg levitra forum 10 mg kjope viagra online cialis sublingual buy generic viagra calgary cialis buy coventry generic levitra manufacture administrare augmentin 500mg cialis 36 hour generic lisinopril tablet 5mg 100mg clomid zwanger lisinopril cost 10mg viagra online discreet usa 800 mg viagra overnight cheap levitra cialis 5mg sales 800mg generic cialis dapoxetine online pharmacy buy levitra sale zoloft 75 mg daily cheapest dapoxetine levitra 2.5mg online online amsterdam viagra diflucan compresse 50 mg wirkung levitra 20mg vademecum cialis 5 mg coupons viagra online cialis cheap cost lisinopril 40 mg tabs zithromax buy atl packungsbeilage cialis 20mg costo levitra 5 mg prezzo zoloft 50 mg € generico para nexium nexium tablets 20mg confezione cialis 20 mg tetracycline 50 mg nexium 75mg generic cialis 2,5 nexium liver disorders lexapro generic safe levitra 20mg pricing strattera 40 mg sleepy lexapro prescription online cialis 800mg overdose buy viagra indonesia viagra 100mg results generic lexapro name order cialis singapore viagra cream buy cheap nexium tablets generic viagra mylan cialis online sydney super viagra generic nolvadex pct buy buy viagra lebanon zithromax for cheap 100mg zoloft review mexican viagra online viagra generic sample doxycycline hyclate 80mgs prednisone 20 mg pak nexium 40 mg n3 kamagra gel 20 mg propranolol 40 mg grossesse clomid ohss 50mg buy cialis cina zovirax 400 mg cena cialis online Washington order propecia cod levitra vademecum 10 mg cheap nexium 40 mg cheap sale viagra nexium become generic cialis jelly 20 mg 30 mg levitra safe viagra strengths mg generic lexapro recreational generic lisinopril identification valor nexium 40 mg order viagra cvs buy zovirax budapest cheapest zovirax online lexapro generic timing zithromax oral online lexapro generic when amoxil suspension buy viagra generic british levitra 10 mg forum 5mg propecia viagra buy oonline
Home Pete Toms LWIB: Updates on Reforming the Amatuer Draft, and Revenue Sharing

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 883 guests online

Atom RSS

LWIB: Updates on Reforming the Amatuer Draft, and Revenue Sharing PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 6
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Monday, 19 October 2009 00:03

Last Week in Bizball by Pete Toms

This week in LWIB, as both the implementation of mandatory slotting and the introduction of a player draft to Latin America appear a foregone conclusion, the debate over reforming the draft shifts to the specifics.  Plus, the divergent opinions concerning the merits of revenue sharing in MLB were once again on display LWIB.

REFORMING THE AMATUER DRAFT UPDATE

According to Baseball America, during an interview earlier this month on ESPN Radio, Commissioner Selig responded to a question concerning the future of MLB’s amateur draft.

We need an international draft, and we need slotting. There is no question about it. I’ve had many clubs on all sides, small-market, big-market, medium-market—we’re going to have slotting, and we’re going to have an international draft. Those will be two of our great priorities in 2011. There’s no question about it.

Commissioner Selig’s support for mandatory slotting and an expansion of the geographic boundaries of MLB’s amateur draft has long been known. Recommended slots have failed to control escalating signing bonuses. At the same time, too often the draft fails to steer the most talented amateur players to the clubs with the poorest on-field performance. Signing bonuses have also risen drastically in the international free agent market (de facto the Dominican Republic). Along with their desire to curtail the inflating costs of signing players from the Dominican Republic, MLB wants to reform a player development culture that has been widely depicted in the baseball media (with the encouragement of MLB) as corrupt. (signing bonus kickback scandals, rampant misrepresentation of players ages and identities, growing numbers of positive steroid tests in the Dominican Summer League). The escalating dollars being awarded amateur players is a product of growing industry revenues and the increased use of “objective analysis” by clubs in determining how to best maximize their operating budgets. More and more clubs have concluded that an equitable draft structure (as opposed to spending in the free agent market) is key to achieving greater future “competitive balance”.

Mandatory slotting and an international draft (a slight misnomer, the current amateur draft includes Canada and Puerto Rico) are very likely to be introduced in the next CBA. (The current CBA expires in December 2011) While the MLBPA has always opposed any mandatory “capping” of compensation, many pundits believe that resentment amongst veteran players over “rookie compensation” along with diminished demand for veteran free agents, will lead to agreement on the aforementioned changes.

As the introduction of mandatory slotting and an “international” draft appear a foregone conclusion, the debate amongst pundits is moving away from the philosophical to the particulars of the proposal. Will trading of draft picks accompany mandatory slotting? Will mandatory slotting impact on the number of high school players drafted? Will the expansion of the draft to the Dominican Republic resolve the problems MLB has with the “buscone” player development system? At what age will players in the Dominican Republic be subject to the draft?  Will the “international” draft be separate from, or part of, the current Rule 4 draft? Should MLB attempt to force players to “declare” they are entering the draft? In a nutshell, MLB and the PA have much to decide before reformation of the draft becomes reality.  Jim Callis wrote recently for Baseball America;

Sentiment is growing for including international players in the draft, but there are many unresolved questions: Will international players go into the current draft, which will give many of them a better sense of how teams judge their worth? If the idea is to distribute talent more equitably, how would a combined draft help smaller-revenue clubs if they have to use picks to sign mid-level Latino players they previously could acquire as free agents? Or will there be a separate draft, creating a second set of first-round picks for which agents will be thankful?

Will 16-year-old Latin Americans continue to be eligible for pro ball, and if so, will that eventually lead to earlier entry for U.S. draftees? Or will Latinos now have to wait until they're high school seniors, like Puerto Ricans did after they were folded into the draft in 1990—a move that scouts blame for drying up that pipeline of talent?

Will unselected Latin Americans be allowed to sign as free agents after the draft, like other undrafted players currently can? If so, how is MLB going to possibly monitor the ensuing shenanigans with teams and agents conspiring to hide players? MLB already can't keep up with deals getting brokered before the signing period officially begins on July 2.

Kiley McDaniel of Baseball Prospectus is writing a series on reforming the draft. In the first instalment of his “Tweaking the Talent System” series, Mr. McDaniel examines the debate within MLB over the necessity of coupling the trading of draft picks with mandatory slotting.

Almost everyone surveyed agreed that trading picks in the current draft system would cause as many problems as solutions, but would be a slam dunk in a hard-slotting environment. "I've been a fan of trading picks for awhile and with a hard-slotting system it would be a necessity," said an AL executive. After a few conversations, it was evident that trading picks and hard-slotting are a package deal. If each pick has a mandated bonus attached to it, teams have to be able to control the amount and structure of their draft spending…..Some implications that come with this simple reform:

The commonly-referenced downside to trading picks is the ability for agents to demand trades. If the agents essentially can't negotiate contracts, all they can do is try to place their client at the best pick. This usually means the highest possible pick (thus, highest mandated bonus), but it could mean avoiding certain poorly-run organizations.

AND

One exec suggested protecting the top five or ten picks from being traded to eliminate clubs being forced to trade what could be a franchise player. The problem with that is clubs then couldn't trade down, even if it was their best strategic option. Either way, it doesn't make sense to have sweeping draft reform to evenly distribute talent, only to leave a big loophole for not achieving that goal.

An AL executive came to the rescue, noting "The problem is agents forcing top picks to big markets? If the player is good enough to demand a trade, then more than one team will want to trade up. If just two teams bid for the pick, the club will get fair value, or very close to it." There's a heavy incentive for non-elite players to avoid making demands with hard-slotting. If clubs listen, the player would slide down the board and lose cash with each pick—almost the exact opposite of what happens now. Only players who would cause trading-up bidding wars would make such demands, and clubs would get fair value if they chose to deal the pick. With such an emphasis in recent years toward collecting cost-controlled talent, clubs may overpay in major league-ready talent to acquire certain elite amateur talents.

LWIB, the second instalment of Mr. McDaniel’s series was published. Mr. McDaniel poses some important questions concerning the possibility of players having to declare draft eligibility and, if so, the consequences of the NCAA’s current restrictions on player agents (see the Andy Oliver case). Mr McDaniel also speculates about the value, and perhaps necessity, of an NFL like “scouting advisory board” if players are forced to declare themselves draft eligible. Mr. McDaniel speculates that the most drastic changes that could arise from declaring draft eligibility would occur in the low minors and college baseball.

Another widely discussed reform is making players declare themselves eligible for the draft. This looks like another straightforward nail-in-the-agent/amateur-player coffin but, in tandem with mandated slots, opens a big can of administrative worms. The makeup of baseball at every level below Double-A could look completely different just because a seemingly simple set of reforms designed to spread out talent and take some power back from the agents.

AND

A clear pro-club byproduct of the hard-slotting system is that many more high school players will be going to college. There were 42 millionaires in the 2009 draft, and 30 recommended slots calling for a seven-figure bonus. There were scores of well-over-slot six-figure deals that would not exist in a slotted draft. One agent characterized the ramifications: "The top 20-30 high school players will sign, and once you get out of the first few rounds, it will be all college kids [being drafted]." This would, in turn, change the face of college baseball and the low minors.

The talent influx would move college baseball toward a new golden age. Most players being drafted will be two or three years older than they are now. Combine that with a possible draft date change, and short-season minor leagues are probably dead. With less roster spots to fill, the draft can (finally) be shortened from 50 rounds.

Commissioner Selig, most clubs, most baseball pundits and many veteran players all agree that fundamental change to the amateur draft is a necessity. As the expiration of the CBA draws nearer, the details and domino effects of these changes will be subject to increasingly greater scrutiny and debate both in the baseball media and in labour negotiations.

Select Read More to see an update on the revenue sharing debate

 

 

REVENUE SHARING DEBATE UPDATE

It is now inevitable that a large payroll franchise will be 2009 World Series champion. Not surprisingly, this has led to renewed criticisms from some pundits and small payroll franchises that increased revenue sharing is needed in MLB. Only a year ago, the Milwaukee Brewers competing in the postseason combined with the Tampa Bay Rays playing in the World Series, had some pundits and large payroll franchises arguing that MLB had achieved “competitive balance”. The on-field results of one or two seasons is probably insufficient to make any definite conclusions about the contributions of revenue sharing to the state of “competitive balance”.  Nonetheless, LWIB provided two examples of the stark differences between the two sides in the revenue sharing / competitive balance debate.

Wayne G, McDonnell Jr., clinical assistant professor of sports management at NYU, wrote in The SportsBusiness Journal that it is time for Commissioner Selig to halt the practice of “revenue payees” using their revenue sharing proceeds to bolster their bottom lines. Instead, Mr. McDonnell argues that it is Commissioner Selig’s responsibility to ensure that the “revenue payees” use their revenue sharing proceeds to field more competitive baseball teams. As is typically the case in this debate, rightly or wrongly, the Pittsburgh Pirates are referenced as the prime example.

While the commissioner deserves a tremendous amount of credit for resuscitating baseball’s stagnant economic model, he also has to assume responsibility for the consistent reluctance of ballclubs such as the Pittsburgh Pirates and their inability to fully embrace revenue sharing. The Pirates are obviously content with the current state of affairs regarding the distribution of revenue and eagerly await their annual reward of $35 million to $40 million for producing an inferior product. As the Pirates’ aspirations for mediocrity are met with disdain by a dwindling fan base, they are handsomely compensated for blatant mismanagement. As cries for a salary cap can be heard from around the Allegheny River, the Pirates vociferously complain about economic imbalances and their inability to compete for the better part of two decades.

While the Pirates are an easy target when it comes to the misappropriation of revenue sharing, they are not the only culprit that consistently demonstrates miserly behaviors. Instead of investing revenue-sharing funds into player acquisitions and the development of farm systems, select ballclubs trade their most valuable assets and revise their profit-maximizing strategies by reducing payroll and adversely affecting the overall performance of their ballclubs. As a result, local revenue will greatly diminish and ballclubs are now eligible to receive even larger revenue-sharing transfers from Major League Baseball. While the collective-bargaining agreement makes allusions to accountability with regard to revenue sharing, Selig has yet to impose a penalty on a ballclub that has violated the basic premise of the revenue-sharing plan.

AND

Selig needs to revisit the policies regarding punishment for ballclubs that fail to use their revenue-sharing receipts in the manner in which the program was designed. Ballclubs such as the Yankees and Red Sox each contribute almost $60 million to $80 million a year to revenue sharing so that “payee clubs” have a legitimate opportunity at being competitive.

Selig cannot overlook the vast financial contributions that “payor clubs” make to revenue sharing, and it is his responsibility to act in the best interests of all 30 ball clubs.

(Not to discredit Mr. McDonnell, but in fairness to the Pirates, while they did slash their major league payroll this season they have in recent years increased investments in the amateur draft as well as player development in Latin America).

Joe Starkey from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review also blames Commissioner Selig for not resolving the “competitive balance“ problem in MLB. But unlike Mr. McDonnell, he does not accuse “revenue payees” of misusing their revenue sharing proceeds. Instead, Mr. Starkey blames Commissioner Selig for reigning over MLB’s “idiotic economic system”.

Bud says the years 2004-08 were competitively balanced. The facts disagree. The facts tell us that of the 48 teams with a sub-$60 million payroll during that span, only 13 had a winning record and only four made the playoffs. That's a .083 batting average, which would be good for Brian Bixler but doesn't exactly spawn hope for the lower third of the league's spenders.

Meanwhile, of the 30 teams that spent at least $100 million, 26 had a winning record and 16 made the playoffs.

Let us review: More than half of the $100 million teams made the playoffs, compared to fewer than one in 10 of the sub-$60 million teams. Nearly 90 percent of the $100 million teams had a winning record, compared to 27 percent of the sub-$60 million teams.

So, tell me, are we talking parity or parody?

Short of a hard salary cap (the payroll “luxury tax“ in MLB serves as a cap for all franchises except the Yankees), the debate over the merits of revenue sharing amongst fans, media and small and large market franchises is likely without end. The introduction of a hard salary cap and salary floor to MLB is extremely unlikely given the MLBPA’s and large market franchises’ opposition. As well, MLB and the MLBPA are aware that the other “stick and ball” leagues have learned that hard salary caps and floors bring with them inherent difficulties. In the short term, Commissioner Selig is again faced with the challenge of balancing the needs of large and small market franchises. At the same time, Commissioner Selig requires the consent of the MLBPA to change the revenue sharing formulas. Increased revenue sharing is a difficult pill to swallow for the PA because it suppresses player compensation. However, tweaking revenue sharing formulas is only one of the options available to Commissioner Selig in satisfying the small payroll franchises need for increased on-field parity. Mandatory slotting and an expanded playoff format could also contribute to placating the small revenue owners demands for increased “competitive balance”.


OTHER NEWS FROM THE BUSINESS OF SPORTS NETWORK

(THE BIZ OF FOOTBALL)

(THE BIZ OF HOCKEY)

(THE BIZ OF BASKETBALL)


Pete Toms is an author for the Business of Sports Network, most notably, The Biz of Baseball. He looks forward to your comments and can be contacted through The Biz of Baseball.

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter Twitter

FacebookFollow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?