cialis online lloyds diflucan 1oo mg clomid 100mg chances valtrex ordering cialis 5 mg 14 original cialis cheap prednisone 1 mg tablets nexium 40 mg inyectable levitra filmtabletten 5 mg cheap cialis medication synthroid 225 mg buy cialis cina zovirax acyclovir generic buy zoloft 50 mg nexium 30 count 40 mg propecia generic patent buy generic zoloft anxiety disorder wellbutrin 100 mg of prednisone doxycycline 500mg 28 lexapro generic side taking 25mg clomid lisinopril 40 mg watson generic cialis rayh viagra 100mg 16 viagra online kroger answers online viagra prednisone panic disorder generic to cialis nexium 10 mg granulado levitra 10 mg opinioni zithromax uk buy 20mg nolvadex day nexium price 20 mg overdose propranolol 10 mg generic viagra 2011 viagra online china provames 2mg clomid strattera dosage 80 mg taking 40 mg cialis kegunaan nexium 40mg generic cialis 2.5 mg. ordering doxycycline online 100 mg artificial viagra propecia 5 mg uk take 500 mg valtrex clomid 100mg bfp 800 mg cialis reviews cheap nexium 40 mg viagra online ads generico viagra bula cialis online ricetta kamagra apotheke online kamagra online australia viagra generico cialis best generic doxycycline levitra 10mg forum viagra 4 filmtbl 100 mg lexapro 10 mg forum lexapro 15mg generico buying viagra soho priligy 60 mg erfahrung buy mygra viagra strattera generic cost cialis 100 mg overnight kamagra shop online priligy 30 mg indicazioni propecia cheap drugs 20mg lexapro dose buy nolvadex steroids 25 mg of prednisone get valtrex online buy cipro nexium esomeprazole 10 mg cialis 20mgcanada goodrx cheapest viagra diflucan 150 mg tab cipro xl mg zovirax online canada anxiety disorders zoloft posologia cialis 10 mg clomid 150 mg pcos levitra buy cheap 6 cheap propecia online 2.5 mgs lexapro cialis generic effective buying cialis forums propranolol 40 mg costo celebrex 20mg online propecia prescription kamagra gel 20 mg cialis price generic lexapro 20 mg presentacion free cialis 20mg zoloft online prescription metformin al 1000 mg cialis pills order golden viagra 3800 mg zithromax generic available medikament celebrex 100 mg phenergan 12.5mg 250 mg of erythromycin asda generic viagra generic viagra professional cialis 40mg australia 20mg levitra canada viagra 100mgusa generic super cialis clomid 50mg pregnant fast online viagra cialis da 40 mg buy amoxil 875 zoloft 75 mg tabs strattera 40 mg price generic viagra drugs costo levitra 5 mg mg of synthroid cialis online italy valtrex 100mg zithromax buy online medicamento augmentin 500 mg nexium generic form prednisone 20 mg bid viagra 100 mg 2 compresse lexapro 30 mg tablet erythromycin ethylsuccinate 800 mg cialis 5mg 100 pills celebrex 200mg preis 20 mg. prednisone tablets online synthroid metformin online australia diflucan da 100 mg cheapest dapoxetine nexium 40 mg 28 tb viagra 150mg cheap lloyds cialis online propranolol 40 mg dawkowanie propecia generic work cialis 5mg package cytotec online buy buy cialis brampton pct clomid online arrested buying cialis qualitest lisinopril 10 mg generic lisinopril 20 mg cialis buy now lexapro 40mg prednisone 20 mg sinus forums generic viagra zovirax obat generic australian cialis buy Buy Levitra pill makes generic cialis order cheap cialis cialis 5mg pharmacie cialis 5mg tablet online pfizer viagra cumpara cialis online levitra 20mg einnahme anwendung xenical 120 mg 50mg vs 100 viagra levitra 20 mg test xenical 120 mg romania online viagra thailand nolvadex tablet 30mg buying generic lexapro 150 mg viagra dangerous buy viagra athens opinioni cialis 5 mg propecia 1 mg effectiveness clomid online soon buy viagra jelly doxycycline 400 mg safe online ordering viagra valtrex buy cheap viagra farmaci generici zithromax sirop300mg bactrim forte 500 mg costo viagra 25 mg 1750 mg augmentin generic viagra chinatown viagra 50mg drunk generic viagra good taking 25 mg viagra farmaco cialis generico viagra 25 mg pret levitra 20mg longevity viagra jet 20 mg cialis 1 mg generic cialis research comprare cialis 40 mg doxycycline 100 mg 14 caps levitra original 40 mg nexium generic product xenical generico chile viagra 100 mg teilbar 800 mg viagra gold lisinopril 5 mg dosis price cialis online propranolol 20 mg pliva forum priligy generico buy viagra online 35008 nexium capsule 40 mg cialis pricing online prednisone 5mg online clomid 400 mg zovirax pills 200 mg zithromax online order erythromycin tab 500mg bactrim ds order generic wellbutrin 150 mg generic cialis illegal generic cialis berlin viagra buy budapest viagra online issues cialis cheap overnight nexium 40mg diarreia propranolol 40 mg migraines phenergan dosage 10mg generic cialis 40 cheap strattera 10 mg capsules lasix 40 mg jugoremedija propecia .5mg 2013 buy lasix tablets prednisone 5 mg posologie generic synthroid strengths cipro 800 mg buy priligy paypal cialis 5mg 120 cheap cialis jelly metformin tablets buy priligy uk buy metformin 500 mg image prednisone 4 mg dosepak clomid 50 mg results zithromax online purchase order cialis 2.5 mg prix viagra 50mg viagra harrow buy online levitra prices get cheap cialis propranolol 10mg migraine buy zovirax capsule buy zovirax walgreens cheap kamagra online commander cialis generic nexium 20 mg cp strattera buy paypal cheap levitra walgren propranolol 100mg amoxil 400 mg suspension cialis 5mg davkovanie phenergan 12.5 mg suppository cialis 40mg efahrung thuoc nexium 002 mg 50mg clomid pcos wellbutrin 450 mg day nexium 40mg n28 lisinopril 10mg pill buspar 5 mg tablet wellbutrin 300 mg online levitra 20 mg posologie bactrim jarabe 200 40 mg cialis 600 mg dawkowanie doxycycline my 100mg erythromycin 1000 mg granulat cheap zovirax canada buy propranolol hydrochloride doxycycline cheap online cialis 20mg brand lisinopril 20 12.5 mg kamagra 150mg dosage viagra 8000mg clomid 100 mg online viagra 220 mg cialis 20mg 30 tablet zithromax 500mg venta xenical online cialis 5mg only zithromax online eu 40 mg lasix im 150mg viagra online levitra generic not canadian levitra generic valtrex 500mg caplet lexapro buy generic buy propecia pills buy tijuana viagra augmentin 375 mg used diflucan prescription online local cheap cialis propranolol tablets 40mg counterfeit cialis 50mg doxycycline 100 mg ulotka sildenafil viagra 100mg generic viagra cena online paypal propecia levitra generic uk viagra very cheap kamagra dubai buy tadalafil cialis 200mg online pharmacy xenical cialis take 4 5mg synthroid .5mg viagra online shoping koop propecia online order doxycycline 100 mg costi cialis generico lupin generic zoloft 20mg cialis nitroboosters tetracycline mail order valtrex tabletas 500 mg nz cheap cialis viagra order australia viagra 50 mg wikipedia glucophage generico 20mg lexapro daily buy zithromax paypal augmentin 228 mg dosage buy 40 mg lisinopril strattera 60 mg overdose buy viagra berlin mylan nolvadex buy billig cialis 20mg augmentin generic substitute viagra online gel prednisone 20 mg instructions generic cialis youtube generic to strattera generic cialis pro viagra directions 100 mg buy zithromax 500mg nexium online compare 5 mg propranolol anxiety buy nexium internet kamagra goedkoop online cheap cialis 5mg viagra... cialis 20mg ordering doxycycline antibiotics buy generic lexapro free 20 mg cialis zithromax generic dose wellbutrin generic dosages levitra tablets 100mg levitra generico italia clomid online uk 25 mg zoloft reviews 300 mg doxycycline acne generic of viagra liquid zithromax buy lasix 50 mg lisinopril 800mg 2.5mg citalopram fake viagra 50mg lexapro 10 mg valor sell kamagra online generic viagra 200mg cheapest 20mg cialis cheap 150 mg viagra generic wellbutrin problems 2012 lexapro 5mg weight propranolol 40mg lch generic wellbutrin warning traitement cialis 5mg generic cialis answers prednisone mylan 20 mg superactive cialis 20mg viagra mexico generico levitra 10 mg contraindicaciones cialis 20mg marseille buspar dosage 90 mg reputable online viagra lisinopril overdose 40 mg buy viagra indonesia buy phenergan cream phenergan 50 mg bula cialis 5mg buy 100 mg levitra viagra 0.25 mg forum generic lisinopril identification levitra cheapest online viagra amsterdam buy xenical 120 mg prospecto buy tetracycline 250 mg cialis 200 mg srbija prospect nexium 20 mg cialis generika 5 mg cialis online authentic clomid pcos 50mg generic viagra stores 50 mg of cialis lexapro generic reviews 2012 ranbaxy nexium generic levitra 20 mg prescription doxycycline calcium 50 mg cost generic propecia 50 mg cialis longs canadian dapoxetine online danger 20 mg levitra levitra 20mg generika cialis 5 mg cena cialis 10mg fta4 generic viagra 150 mg bactrim antibiotic online levitra 10 mg bayer doxycycline 800 mg cialis generico funciona 100mg. vardenafil levitra levitra 20mg nebenwirkungen buy viagra lloyds prix doxycycline 100mg kamagra fast order zithromax online overnight cialis 5mg turkey cialis 2.5mg daily pastilla doxycycline 100mg tapering prednisone 10 mg diflucan 100 mg cost nexium 40mg jejum buy zithromax 500 mg zovirax pills online generic 25 mg viagra generic propranolol medication xenical mg viagra 50mg rezeptfrei generic viagra review 2012 glucophage 500 mg metformin buy 40 mg cialis 10 mg generic cialis ubat metformin 500 mg nolvadex tamoxifen buy cumpar xenical online levitra 40 mg reviews doxycycline 50 mg reviews metformin actavis 1000 mg cheap generic valtrex cialis veilig online fungsi zovirax 200mg generic cialis double levitra 2 5 mg 60 mg prednisone dosage inj lasix 40 mg glucophage xr 500mg amiloride hydrochlorothiazide generic viagra gold online valtrex cream generic 10mg cialis generic viagra cheap cheap lexapro 5mg dose cialis mail order cialis 36 hour generic zoloft 50 mgs cheapest professional viagra propecia online sales generic viagra ciple acquisto cialis 20 mg wellbutrin 150 mg daily levitra 20mg teilen synthroid generic brand propranolol 40 mg dosis valtrex generic version buy azithromycin zithromax koop cialis online doxycycline 100mg skin zithromax 500 mg uses cialis 2.5mg australia viagra pills 100 mg cialis buy tesco viagra 100 mg effectiveness wellbutrin xl 150 mg cialis 5mg uk viagra 30 pills 100 mg propranolol to buy cialis buy jakarta cialis su generico prednisone 20 mg steroids cialis difference mg diflucan online purchase propecia generic alternative viagra 12 mg online levitra prescription buy propecia eu cialis generico ems 5000 mg viagra strattera 160 mg study 500 mg prednisone sublingual cialis 40mg doxycycline 100 mg dog effet cialis 10mg buy cialis lloyds generic levitra europe buy .99 generic viagra lexapro become generic buy cialis romania buy nexium india cialis 2.5 mg buy viagra generic lowest cialis 20 mg faq generics of viagra order zithromax pfizer
Home Maury Brown The Battle Over Content Fair Use Places "Aggregators" in the Crosshairs

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 272 guests online

Atom RSS

The Battle Over Content Fair Use Places "Aggregators" in the Crosshairs PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 28
PoorBest 
Written by Maury Brown   
Tuesday, 04 August 2009 03:27

The Biz of Baseball - ExclusiveCORRECTION: Within the article, Bart Hubbuch of the New York Post referenced ESPN's Buster Olney as someone that he believes links "properly." The article then went on to reference an article/video piece with Olney that has references to the Washington Post without linking back.

Olney contacted me to say that he only was involved in the video piece, and the cooresponding article is an ESPN news service piece, based largely on what Pedro Gomez reported and augmented by the info from the Washington Post.

The article has been corrected to reflect this.


If you follow sports on the web, you most likely read ESPN, or SI, or The New York Times. And just as likely as you are to read those traditional media outlets, you might be just as likely to make Baseball Think Factory, MLB Trade Rumors, or MetsBlog your daily stop.

 

Both types of sites are exceptionally popular.

Both, for the most part, are very different.

The new media sites mentioned have been called by some as "aggregators", sites that sweep the web, find the best stories for their given audience, and either copy and paste a paragraph or two of article with a link back, or describe the gist of the article in total and link back.

The value of these sites is that they make it easy to go to a single location and get information from a broad range of sites and then engage in commentary with others in a blog format.

For some that write for the larger traditional sites that get linked to – at least for some of the writers – aggregators are stealing content.

What is Fair Use?

At the heart of the debate is what is deemed as fair use of content. At its extreme, if you copy>paste an entire article in a blog, and don’t link back, it’s a clear sign of copyright infringement. But, from there, it becomes a case of interpretation.

For example, if an article is three paragraphs long, and a blog lifts two paragraphs, you can make a solid case that it does not fall within the “fair use” boundaries. But, what if the article is 5 or 6 paragraphs, the blogger lifts two paragraphs, and then writes a lengthy commentary around what was pulled and links back? What then? At that point, you have what has been considered traditional blogging since, well… blogging pretty much began.

But, there are a writers that see that method as over-stepping the boundaries. The argument goes, if the entire gist of the article is republished, why would anyone feel the need to actually click to the originating content?

This past Sunday, Ian Shapira of the Washington Post bemoaned the aggregating of content in an article entitled, The Death of Journalism (Gawker Edition). That caught the eye of Bart Hubbuch, the Mets beat writer of the New York Post, who said on Twitter that if you replaced “Gawker” with “metsblog.com” you’ll know exactly how Mets beat writers feel. As Hubbuch continued, “Beat writers object when aggregators cut and paste large sections and quotes from stories.”

Aggregators as Bloggers and Traditional Media Outlets

Hubbuch made a clear point that he views aggregators as different from bloggers, saying, “I have no objections whatsoever to bloggers who do their own work.”

The problem is, the lines can get particularly gray in this regard.

A good example is the SportsBusiness Daily, an extension of the SportsBusiness Journal, who is owned by American City Business Journals. The site is considered an electronic trade magazine, and is rarely, if ever, called a blog or aggregator. The SBD, is a subscription based site, that not only reports on news from other outlets, it provides an extensive amount of information researched and reported from the SportsBusiness Journal staff. They are considered the premiere sports business media outlet. As mentioned, they are a subscription based outlet. As an example, a single user, six month (26 weeks) rate is $700. (see an example of a page from the SportsBusiness Daily – PDF).

Yet, when I asked Hubbuch if he sees the SportsBusiness Daily as being guilty of aggregating content, he said, “Yes it is, in my opinion. Especially with how much the [SportsBusiness Journal] charges for that. I wonder how many publications are aware of SBD…” adding, “…and how freely they cut and paste. I see SBD, and there isn't even that many links in there.”

What About Referencing Without Linking In Mainstream Articles?

Pressed for what Hubbuch sees as the proper method for linking back to content, he cited Buster Olney’s blogging technique of a “one-sentence tease” with a link as being “spot on” – fair use.

However, a search of ESPN brought up this video/article on the Nationals and efforts to sign Stephen Strasburg.

Olney is only within the video, and did not contribute to the corresponding article. It is published as an ESPN News Service piece by Pedro Gomez. The total length of the article is six paragraphs tied to a video clip. Of the six paragraphs, three contain details with the reference, “according to the Washington Post.” There is no link to the Washington Post, simply the citation. Is this fair use? It is unknown whether ESPN has any agreements with the Washington Post, but if not, it points to another instance of how content is republished across media outlets.

That aside, referencing other news sources does occur in mainstream media, through lucrative content agreements. An example of this can be seen in this The Associated Press article from Monday in regards to The Boston Globe story on two security staffers with the Red Sox being fired after being linked to steroid use. The AP agreements allow not only licensed outlets to publish AP stories, but The AP has the right to reference the content of those that license content of The AP.

Fair Use Will Move Beyond Just Opinion

The issue of fair use of content is moving out of the sphere of personal opinion between those that provide original content, and those that aggregate that news. In June of 2008, a blogger was sued by The AP over six disputed blog entries, one of which had “18 words from the story and a 32-word quote by Hillary Clinton.”

The Associated Press Board of Directors voted this past March that “it would launch an industry initiative to protect news content from misappropriation online.”

In a statement at the time, AP Chairman Dean Singleton said the news cooperative would work with portals and other partners who properly license content – and would pursue legal and legislative actions against those who don‘t.
“We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories,“ Singleton said at the AP annual meeting, in San Diego. As part of the initiative, AP will develop a system to track content distributed online to determine if it is being legally used.

Standards For Fair Use Sets Up a Likely Court Challenge

While The AP seems to be drawing a clear line in the sand, other media outlets have yet to follow suit, although it may be simply a matter of time. Legal challenges seem a near certainty as the statements give way to practice.

As mentioned, one of the aggregators Hubbuch takes issue with is Matthew Cerrone’s MetsBlog.com, one of, if not the most popular Mets outlets on the web. As Cerrone was pulled into the Twitter conversation on fair use, he said in one Tweet, “WFAN just cited a newspaper report on air. I tried to click the link, but it was radio, so I guess I can't read the original report.”

While comedic, it begs the question: What news can be re-reported without crossing the “copyright infringement line?” It’s an extreme example but will Re-Tweets on Twitter become simply aggregating? If content is going to be policed, then there will need to be standards by which all will be held, a difficult legal matter that is bound to touch on copyright use.

Finally, One Might Consider the Following...

The newspaper industry has seen collapse after collapse due to waning revenues as news becomes readily available across multiple platforms. With newspaper website ad revenues becoming critical to their bottom line, playing hardball with aggregators could present a case of the aggregators finding less stringent sources to follow, which in turn lowers page views to stories once linked to, which, in turn lowers critical revenues, which, in the end, could lead to more layoffs and shutdowns in the print industry. While aggregating content may rub some writers raw, they are, in many ways, supplementing their paychecks. There needs to be a proper line between fair use, and cutting the flow of revenues off at the spigot by cutting aggregators off entirely. I'm reminded of the old saying... Don’t bite the hand that feeds.

Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

If you follow sports on the web, you most likely read ESPN, or SI, or The New York Times. And just as likely as you read those traditional media outlets, you might be just as likely to make Baseball Think Factory, MLB Trade Rumors, or MetsBlog your daily stop.

Both types of sites are exceptionally. Both, for the most part, are very different.

The new media sites mentioned have been called by some as aggregators, sites that sweep the web, find the best stories for their given audience, and either copy and paste a paragraph or two of article with a link back, or describe the gist of the article in total and link back.

The value of these sites, is that they make it easy to go to a single location and get information from a broad range of sites and then engage in commentary with others in a blog format.

For some that write for the larger traditional sites that get linked to – at least for some of the writers – is that they view aggregators as stealing content.

What is Fair Use?

At the heart of the debate is what is deemed as fair use of content. At its extreme, if you copy>paste an entire article in a blog, and don’t link back, it’s a clear sign of copyright infringement. But, from there, it becomes a case of interpretation.

For example, if an article is three paragraphs long, and a blog lifts two paragraphs, you can make a solid case that it does not fall within the “fair use” boundaries. But, what if the article is 5 or 6 paragraphs, the blogger lifts two paragraphs, and then writes a lengthy commentary around what was pulled? What then? At that point, you have what has been considered traditional blogging since, well… blogging pretty much began.

But, there are a writers that see that method as over-stepping the boundaries. If the entire gist of the article is republished, why would anyone feel the need to actually click to the originating content?

This past Sunday, Ian Shapira of the Washington Post bemoaned the aggregating of content in an article entitled, The Death of Journalism (Gawker Edition). That caught the eye of Bart Hubbuch, the Mets beat writer of the New York Post, who said on Twitter that if you replaced “Gawker” with “metsblog.com” you’ll know exactly how Mets beat writers feel. As Hubbuch continued,Beat writers object when aggregators cut and paste large sections and quotes from stories.”

Aggregators as Bloggers and Traditional Media Outlets

Hubbuch made a clear point that he views aggregators as different from bloggers, saying, “I have no objections whatsoever to bloggers who do their own work.”

The problem is, the lines can get particularly gray in this regard.

A good example is the SportsBusiness Daily, an extension of the SportsBusiness Journal, who is owned by American City Business Journals. The site is considered an electronic trade magazine, and is rarely, if ever, called a blog or aggregator. The SBD, is a subscription based site. As an example, a single user, six month (26 weeks) rate is $700. (see an example of a page from the SportsBusiness Daily – PDF).

Yet, when I asked Hubbuch if he sees the SportsBusiness Daily as being guilty of aggregator of content, he said, “Yes it is, in my opinion. Especially with how much the [SportsBusiness Journal] charges for that. I wonder how many publications are aware of SBD…” adding, “…and how freely they cut and paste. I see SBD, and there isn't even that many links in there.”

What About Referencing Without Linking In Mainstream Articles?

Pressed for what Hubbuch sees as the proper method for linking back to content, he cited Buster Olney’s blogging technique of a “one-sentence tease” with a link as being “spot on.” – fair use.

However, a search of ESPN brought up this article by Olney on the Nationals and efforts to sign Stephen Strasburg.

The total length of the article is six paragraphs tied to a video clip. Of the six paragraphs, three contain details with the reference, “according to the Washington Post.” There is no link to the Washington Post, simply the citation. Is this fair use? Without placing words in Hubbuch’s mouth, the difference may be that Olney’s referencing of the Washington Post story is a rare exception, not the rule. Olney is considered one of the best in the baseball business for breaking news. He’s hardly an “aggregator”.

But, the point being made here is it’s difficult to say that it’s unacceptable for a new media outlet to aggregate news, when traditional news sources do it almost daily. A quick search finds that gold standard news organizations such as The Associated Press did so on Monday in regards to The Boston Globe story on two security staffers with the Red Sox being fired after being linked to steroid use.

Fair Use Will Move Beyond Just Opinion

The issue of fair use of content is moving out of the sphere of personal opinion between those that provide original content, and those that aggregate that news. In June of 2008, a blogger was sued by The AP over six disputed blog entries, one of which had “18 words from the story and a 32-word quote by Hillary Clinton.”

The Associated Press Board of Directors voted this past March that “it would launch an industry initiative to protect news content from misappropriation online.”

In a statement at the time, AP Chairman Dean Singleton said the news cooperative would work with portals and other partners who properly license content – and would pursue legal and legislative actions against those who don‘t.
“We can no longer stand by and watch others walk off with our work under misguided legal theories,“ Singleton said at the AP annual meeting, in San Diego.
As part of the initiative, AP will develop a system to track content distributed online to determine if it is being legally used.

Standards For Fair Use Make a Likely Court Challenge

While The AP seems to be drawing a clear line in the sand, other media outlets have yet to follow suit, although it may be simply a matter of time. Legal challenges seem a near certainty.

As mentioned, one of the aggregators mentioned Hubbuch takes issue with is Matthew Cerrone’s MetsBlog.com, one of, if not the most popular Mets outlets on the web. As Cerrone was pulled into the Twitter conversation on fair use, he said in one Tweet, “WFAN just cited a newspaper report on air. I tried to click the link, but it was radio, so I guess I can't read the original report.”

While comedic, it begs the question: What news can be re-reported without crossing the “copyright infringement line?” It’s an extreme example but will Re-Tweets on Twitter become simply aggregating? If content is going to be policed, then there will need to be standards by which all will be held, a difficult legal matter that is bound to touch on copyright use.

Finally, One Might Consider the Following…

The newspaper industry has seen collapse after collapse due to waning revenues as news becomes readily available across multiple platforms. With newspaper website ad revenues becoming critical to their bottom line, playing hardball with aggregators could present a case of the aggregators finding less stringent sources to follow, which in turn lowers page views to stories once linked to, which, in turn lowers critical revenues, which, in the end, could lead to more layoffs and shutdowns in the print industry. While aggregating content may rub some writers raw, they are, in many ways, supplementing their paychecks. There needs to be a proper line between fair use, and cutting the flow of revenues off at the spigot. As they say, don’t bite the hand that feeds.


Maury BrownMaury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He is contributor to Baseball Prospectus, and is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).

Don't forget to register and log in on The Biz of Baseball site to get updates via your in-box, and see information only logged in members can see.

Follow Maury Brown and the Business of Sports Network on Twitter Twitter

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?