brand cialis vs generic cialis colospan hovid inc seroquel for sleep and anxiety finasteride side effects caverta by ranbaxycealiscealliscealusceebis amitriptyline 150 mg cod phenergan online without prescription doxepin 50 and weight gain garlic bread pizza levetra no prescription lady era review cozaar xq warfarin sodium coumadin side effects viaga from india nitroglycerin 20mg aspirin and pregnancy side effects macrobid 100mg reviews microzide hydrochlorothiazide side effects amphetamine withdrawal symptoms lynoral 0.05 mg cefixime gonorrhea chlamydia vente cialise propranolol hydrochloride 10 mg is there a generic equivqlent for zetia viagra commercial actress lena metformina 850 dosis recomendada de diclofenaco buy atacand online metoprolol side effects atrovent hfa inhaler coupons buy finasteride 1 mg online real viagra for sale online ditropan medication hyperhidrosis i want to buy viagra online paypal accepted online pharmacies ketorolac tromethamine injection 15 mg lesofat vs xenical price arimidex for men on testosterone replacement mirtazapine for sleep buy atorvastatin jelly belly uk viagra healthy man viagra radio commercial tramadol fedex overnight shipping combivent inhaler medication inhalation flomax dosage and administration crestor side effects weight gain canadian pharmacy best rx prozac side effects drug priligy fda approval staxyn 10mg reviews mesterolone bodybuilding routines duloxetine hcl dr 60 mg cap coupons verapamil 240 mg er cialis pills aust propranolol and alcoholism purchase sildenafil citrate otc asthma inhaler brands medrol dose pack cost metformin canada proventil online content definition in art sublingual nitroglycerin tablets vistaril 25mg cap pfizer viagra online from india order azithromycin red tantalum capacitors for audio fluconazole 200 mg treatment omeprazole 20 mg capsules treatment discount viagra india betaprofen fc400v morphine sulfate 30mg keftab patent medicine series yonkis finasteride dosage increasefinasterinefineviagraflomaxtra spanish pharmacy online minocycline 100 mg for acne new healthy man viagra viagra light switch crestor rosuvastatin 10mg price garlic aioli recipe with mayonnaise leponex lekovi premarin online no prescription levitra no prescription ed drug store cialis 20mg from pakistan prednisone deltasone side effects pravastatin side effects medication malegra dxt vigra for men buy ameryal without a prescription gupisone prednisolone 20mg side lamictal and alcohol bipolar bactrim ds no rx actavis codeine takin clomid without doctors care canada pharmacy viagra no prescription anthony kiedis long hair online pharmacy overnight delivery is atarax for itching buy viagra via paypal allegra printing waltham ma cialis on line product in europe allopurinol 100mg dosage vidalta 10 mg valium cytotec prix tunisie benemid medication identification soviclor prescription drugs desogestrel vs norgestimate side effects of diabecon tablets trileptal dosage for bipolar ciprofloxacin ciprobay side effects retirides otc 2015 levitra 20mg film tablets rezepfrei genuine pfizer viagra ciprodex sterile otic suspension in eye ibuprofen dosage for dogs clenbuterol before and after results sotalex medication for anxiety prenisone drug store my mexican drugstore avodart side effects dutasteride and tamsulosin leconfield house curzon street in london metoprolol succ er 25mg fluoxetine hcl 20mg what is fluoxetine dilantin level toxicity symptoms india pharmacy insulin buy goldshield levothyroxine online lawrence walter pharmwc cialis soft 20mg without prescription amoxicillin for sinus infection not working buy 5mg cialis generic bentyl 20 mg cost lanoxin 0.25 mg finpecia reviews cipla qsymia cost at walmart vytorin 10 40 mg potassium deficiency symptoms in adults vidalta 15mg subutex vs suboxone paroxetine 10mg reviews asthma treatment guidelines cuckold definition slang ballin metformin over the counter substitute buy beconase aq without a prescription effects of thalidomide enantiomers nizagara 150 cymbalta side effects weight gain weight loss isoniazid pronunciation of biblical names sublingual gland swelling cancer viagra jelly reviews for men ativan half life drug thalidomide side effects doctor xm radio advertised viagra venlafaxine hcl antidepressants side effects alli trippy hot sertraline zoloft reviewssibutramine viagra orders overnight delivery xanax overdose amount cozaar blood pressure pill metrogel for rosacea and alcohol diclofenaco para que sirve order haldol online capoten contraindications for tpa cialis generic pharmacies seroquel pharmacy online canada aristocort tablets without prescription vigora 5000 sid cialis soft tab india beprogel lotions generic drugs tantalum restaurant long beach sublingual liquid b12 side effects imiquimod cream for molluscum viagra effects prescription sildenafil citrate rizatriptan 10 mg uses zofran 4mg dosage for adults snafi price in pakistan buy viagra online germany 120 actos and bladder cancer lawsuit hyzaar blood pressure hydrochlorothiazide brand where can i get suprax soviclor aciclovir tablets 800mg cialis hello big boy effect buy domperidone uk tramadol 50 mg side effects and alcohol who makes atrovent inhaler medicineauvitraavalide catafast sachets favors expiration date on cialis pill septrin dosage amerimedrx complaints misoprostol over the counter cvs cialis nabp certified online pharmacy elocon mometasone furoate cream disgrasil capsulas de moringa actos side effects weight gain pharmacy rx hydroxyzine pamoate 25mg cap side effects male pheromones to attract women vilches chile map nootropil medicine piracetam zanaflex side effects itching vibrox tablets with windows viagara shipped without prescription eurax ointment for scabies yasmine bleeth 2015 periactin canada promotional viagra free viramune xr problems duloxetine dr cymbalta 60mg capsules feldene piroxicam gel terbinafine 250mg for yeast infection buy narcotics online sibutramine side effects medication vistaril 50mg im propecia reviews side effects fasigyn tinidazole infections cialis to buy mail order latisse price comparison low cost viagra piadas curtas metallica songs fade to black powerpill c augmentin and alcohol antibiotic artane side effects trihexyphenidyl 2mg ciales puerto rico pueblo cialis jelly leponex 25 mg adderall dormidina information literacy antiflu des pediatrico what is tiotropium bromide monohydrate proscar generic buy antabuse online no prescription hydroxyzine pamoate 50mg for dogs pilex tablets for fissures minoxidil side effects for women canada ranitidine tablets 150 mg microzide hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg sildegra price of oil clozapine monitoring guidelines for clinical trials best online pharmacy brand cialis finasteride no prescription octreotide infusion rate canine enalapril side effects in dogs clotrimazole and betamethasone cream 15gm maxalt melt generic viagra on sale viagra radio commercial topiramate 100mg recreational use lasix 500mg list of pills that can get you high brand online valtrex no prescription diltiazem er 240mg capsules online levitra cuckold definition slang faded accutane without prescription miami tamsulosin 0.4 mg capsules used for rualis 20 cialis buy amoxicilin fast delivery order robaxin online ventolin hfa my canadain pharmacy catafast sachets to make lasixs water pill and potassium rxlist drug information pharmaceutical acnelyse cream information system cialis tablets 10mg benicar hct 40 25 side effects cialis costo in farmacia himcolin special price 36 15 lite cialis in qatar levithyroxine buy from india sildenafil citrate medication dosage cefadroxil monohydrate 500mg chloroquine malaria dose nizoral cream walgreens cialis im internet kaufen prednisolone acetate eye drops brand name hydrodiuril manufacturer definition no prescription needed pharmacy ditropan medication classification perlutex catalina can you buy zithromax over the counter cialis online with amex what is orlistat side effects canadian pharcharmy online hydrocodone pharmacies requip generics kebaikan mercilom garlic mashed potato recipe paula deen amlodipine side effects medication pharmacy paypal canada staxyn 10mg odt tablets potassium permanganate crystals subutex vs suboxone cost bactroban cream uses medicine terbinafine 250mg side effects for dogs testosterone basso alitosi flovent hfa 220 mcg cost aspirin side effects medication insurance companies in canada ic furosemide 40 mg side effects lagatrim forte indications for blood motilium 90 tablets cvs pharmacy price for cialis increasing lung capacity exercises eszopiclone generic availability levaquin antibiotic dosage atepros drug flomax overnight delivery gpchealth couponsuzygrathazon tadalafil online india trental without prescription piadas de portugueses where can i get robaxin cytoxan side effects in dogs duetact contraindications for ultrasound complications of flagyl cheap propecia finasteride omaggio olive oil private reserve apartments generic viagra accept paypal epanutin phenytoin level daily dose of b12 for men cuvarlix review viagra without script stilnox 10mg prospect cialis rezeptfrei in deutschland kaufen lamotrigine 200 mg image isotretinoin uk online minoxidil topical solution for women echeck pharmacy zestril lisinopril kenacomb cream uses care by air canadian pharmacy metallica one lyrics lasix for dogs without prescription buy cialis 40 mg online uk claritin dosage for cats fluoxetine without rx where to buy tamoxifen citrate terazosin pharmacy online uk medameds prices on new mobile kamagra bestellen met visa www canadapharmacy 24 viagra miami contrave diet pill coupon purchase cialis online canada online pharmacy australia free delivery cytoxan chemotherapy for ms rapidtabs reviews on vigrx nexiumviagra to buy in canada canadian viagra sales tricilest ukc filitra 20 enalapril maleate side effects zyprexa and weight gain cialis generico india adalat sony tv serial latest episode 2012 overnight femara canadian bactroban nasal buy cialis black for sale india cialis paymentpaypal advair coupons $20coupons for advair 2013 premarin side effects on men where to buy diclofenac yasminelle pilule contraceptive minocycline hcl 100mg quality online generics au cymbalta and provigil reviews aldara side effects look like herpes seroxat antidepressant dosage restonite zolpidem dosage avalide side effects irbesartan hydrochlorothiazide omnicef side effects medication colospan 10mg lortab 7.5mg street price drugs similar to toradol ed pills online brand viagra cialis troppo uso fa male thyroxine binding globulin test pyridium 200mg tablet no prescription birth control pills cialis cheap uk canada rx 24 vidalta carbimazole doseviegravigaravigora cenveo stock profile increasing and decreasing functions calculator viagra vs cialis vs levitra reviews viagra uk without prescription colchincine online no prescription online pharmacies for viagra www onlinepharma no prescription tretinoin awc drug store pain pills for cheap xenical over the counter cost brusing and fluconizole flexidol relax accion terapeutica medica minomycin information systems lexapro reviews valium and viagra online store donde comprar levitra en america over the counter for trazodone coversyl in america cialis 5mg best price canada bystolic generic brand how much does cialis cost per pill brand viagra hong kong echeck vardenafil hcl cipla france online pharmacy pramipexole dosage for bodybuilders protonix generic pantoprazole quickest place to get cialis cardura xl zenerx at walmart genuine viagra online topamax side effects topamax weight loss alli diet pills india pharmacy lidocaine ointment usp 5 usage reductil pastile de slabit zein neurontin side effects neurontin 300mg rogaine rebate forms 2014 india cialis magnesium oxide 400 mg tablets benoquin 20 free shipping xerograx para que sirve terramycin for dogs directions citrato de sildenafila sandoz relafen nabumetone reviews torsemide side effects medicine cialis 20mg malaysia lincocin for dogs antibiotic captopril drug label prozac and weight gain antidepressants effexor xr usa femara success stories with cancer real viagra canada viagra international shipping grifulvin griseofulvin tablets periactin order in the united states online pharmacy colchicine healthy man prescriptions best site to buy periactins online amlodipine besylate 10mg side effects brand name toprol xl side effects united pharmacies review clonidine 0.1 mg uses viagra generika paypal latisse for eyebrows reviews advair discus without a perscription hydroxyzine pamoate vistaril drugibuprofen 2 5 mg cialis online lowest levothroid dosage anafranil for ocd in children adalat sony tv watch online donormyl ingredients in benadryl femara 2.5 mg is it better than clomid tiotropium pronunciation lamotrigine 100mg l122 metronidazole for mycoplasma doxycycline from india pharmacy order cialis without prescription buy humalog uk cefixime dosage and administration ginseng plus feng shi wan uroxatral side effects bph icd baristanet kids calendars si puoprendere cialis con metformina cheap viagera in usa cheap thyroxine sodium tablets for sale can i get albendazole online imigran tablets side effects tadalafil europe colchicine 0 6mg without prescription ritalin dosage for adults phgh rx where to buy anxiety attacks vs panic attacks where can i buy lipitor in the uk foreign phamacy online phexin azcentral buying cytotec uk dicyclomine 10mg information uses buy amitriptyline 50mg progesterone levels during pregnancy 4 weeks coversyl plus 4 1 25 duroval sildenafil tablets propecia dosage chart minoxidil foam generic viagra generico europa pagamento paypal buy combivent with no prescriptions cymbalta no prescription overnight paroxetine buy online india prescription drugs from mexico to us overnight viagra delivery maxaman reviews for fifty where to buy accutane online cycline enterprise huge penis gabapentin overnight atepros medicine cabinets avapro blood pressure medicine recall amoxil 1g stanozolol steroids in sports
Home BoB Documents National Labor Relations Board vs. Major League Baseball, 880 F. Supp. 246 (1995)

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1039 guests online

Atom RSS

National Labor Relations Board vs. Major League Baseball, 880 F. Supp. 246 (1995) PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 70
Selection of Docs
Written by Judge Sonia Sotomayor   
Wednesday, 27 May 2009 01:38



No. 1999 August Term, 1994

(Argued: May 11, 1995) Decided: September 29, 1995

Docket No. 95-6048


DANIEL SILVERMAN, Regional Director

for Region 2 of the National Labor

Relations Board, for and on behalf

of the National Labor Relations Board,

Petitioner-Appellee ,





Respondents-Appellants .


B e f o r e: NEWMAN, Chief Judge , WINTER, and MAHONEY, Circuit

Judges .

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sonia Sotomayor, Judge ) enjoining appellants to restore the terms and conditions of employment provided under an expired collective bargaining agreement. We affirm.

DOUGLAS L. LESLIE, Charlottesville, Virginia (Lisa Klein Wager, Francis L. Casey, III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, New York, New York, of counsel), for Respondents-Appellants .

ELLEN A. FARRELL, Assistant General Counsel (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Mary Joyce Carlson, Assistant General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, Donald B. Zavelo, Ian M. Penny, of counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.), for Petitioner-Appellee .

GEORGE M. COHEN (Virginia A. Seitz, Bredhoff & Kaiser, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Amicus Curiae Major League Baseball Players Association .

WINTER, Circuit Judge :

This is an appeal by the Major League Baseball Player Relations Committee, Inc. ("PRC") and the constituent member clubs of Major League Baseball ("Clubs") from a temporary injunction issued by Judge Sotomayor pursuant to section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). The PRC is the collective bargaining representative for the twenty-eight Clubs. The Major League Baseball Players Association is a union that is the exclusive bargaining representative for the forty-man rosters of each major league club. The injunction is based on the district court's conclusion that appellants violated NLRA §§ 8(a)(1) and (5), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (5), by unilaterally implementing terms and conditions of employment that differed from those in the last collective agreement. It orders the PRC and the Clubs to: (i) abide by the terms of an expired collective agreement, (ii) rescind any actions taken that are inconsistent with that agreement and (iii) bargain in good faith with the Players Association. See Silverman v. Major League Baseball Player Relations Comm., Inc. , 880 F. Supp. 246, 261 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). The injunction is to remain in effect until either (i) the expired agreement is replaced by a new collective bargaining agreement, (ii) the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") renders a final disposition of the matters pending before it in the related administrative case, or (iii) the district court finds, upon petition of either of the parties, that an impasse has occurred. See id. We affirm.


On January 1, 1990, the most recent collective agreement ("Basic Agreement") between appellants and the Players Association became effective. It contained provisions implementing a combination of free agency and a reserve system -- that is, a compromise between free competitive bidding for a player's services and an individual club's exclusive rights to those services.

Free agency, in its purest form, is a status in which the rights to a player's athletic services are not owned by a club and may be shopped around by the player in a quest for the most attractive bid. However, for more than a century, Major League Baseball has had a reserve system that to one degree or another affords individual clubs exclusive property rights to the athletic services of certain players. Before the players were organized and a collective bargaining relationship was established, the standard players contract with a club reserved to the club exclusive rights to a player's services and provided for an annual right of renewal of the contract by the club in question. The Clubs interpreted the contract as allowing the club in question to renew all of an individual player's contract, including the right of renewal provision. So interpreted, this provision -- known generally as the "reserve clause" -- bound a player to one club in perpetuity until traded or released. After the Clubs recognized the Players Association and entered into a collective agreement with it, an arbitrator held in a grievance proceeding that the reserve clause allowed a renewal for only one year rather than a succession of years. See National & American League Professional Baseball Clubs v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n , 66 Lab. Arb. (BNA) 101 (1976) (Seitz, Arb.). Since then, appellants and the Players Association have struggled to accommodate their conflicting interests in the free agency and reserve issues, and a variety of compromises have from time to time been reached. However, relations have been acrimonious, and several strikes and lockouts have occurred. This appeal itself arises out of a strike that terminated the 1994 season before the playoffs and World Series.

Article XX of the Basic Agreement that became effective in 1990 contains a series of provisions that govern free agency and reserve rights. Players with six or more years of major league service are free agents and may seek competing bids in an effort to obtain the best contract, which may of course give exclusive rights to the club for a stipulated number of years. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 250. Free agency is guaranteed by an anti-collusion provision, Article XX(F), which prohibits the Clubs from acting in concert with each other with respect to the exercise of rights under Article XX. See id. Article XX(F) thus prevents the Clubs from agreeing either to refuse to bid for the services of free agents or to offer only low bids to them. Article XX(F) also prohibits players from acting in concert with regard to Article XX rights. See id.

Players with less than six years of service remain under reserve to their individual clubs, although a club may reserve a player only once. Although a minimum annual salary is provided, players with less than three years of major league service must negotiate with their clubs to determine their salary for the coming season. Article XX allows certain reserved players -- generally those with more than three but less than six years of service -- to demand salary arbitration. See id. at 251. Salary arbitration is a mechanism for determining the individual salaries for that group of reserved players if they cannot arrive at an agreement with their clubs. The player and the club each present the arbitrator with a suggested salary figure for a new one-year contract. The arbitrator then inserts either the player's or the club's figure into a blank uniform contract that the parties have already signed. See id. Article VI(F)(12) provides the following with regard to the criteria to be used, and the evidence to be heard, by the arbitrator:

(12) Criteria . (a) The Criteria will be the quality of the Player's contribution to his Club during the past season (including but not limited to his overall performance, special qualities of leadership and public appeal), the length and consistency of his career contribution, the record of the Player's past compensation, comparative baseball salaries . . . , the existence of any physical or mental defects on the part of the Player, and the recent performance record of the Club including but not limited to its League standing and attendance as an indication of public acceptance (subject to the exclusion stated in subparagraph(b)(i) below). Any evidence may be submitted which is relevant to the above criteria, and the arbitrator shall assign such weight to the evidence as shall to him appear appropriate under the circumstances. The arbitrator shall, except for a Player with five or more years of Major League service, give particular attention, for comparative salary purposes, to the contracts of Players with Major League service not exceeding one annual service group above the Player's annual service group. This shall not limit the ability of a Player or his representative, because of special accomplishment, to argue the equal relevance of salaries of Players without regard to service, and the arbitrator shall give whatever weight to such argument as he deems appropriate.


(b) Evidence of the following shall not be admissible:

(i) The financial position of the Player and the Club;

(ii) Press comments, testimonials or similar material bearing on the performance of either the Player or the Club, except that recognized annual Player awards for playing excellence shall not be excluded;

(iii) Offers made by either Player or Club prior to arbitration;


(iv) The cost to the parties of their representatives, attorneys, etc.;


(v) Salaries in other sports or occupations.

The Basic Agreement expired on December 31, 1993, pursuant to the PRC's notice of termination. Although negotiations for a successor agreement did not get underway until March 1994, the PRC and the Players Association continued to observe the terms of the expired Basic Agreement. Prior to the commencement of negotiations, the Clubs and the Players Association had completed individual salary arbitration hearings and had entered into individual player contracts for the 1994 baseball season, which began in April 1994. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 251.

Negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement continued unsuccessfully. The PRC offered its first formal economic proposal to the Players Association at a meeting on June 14, 1994. It included a "salary cap," a mechanism that establishes a ceiling on the total player salaries paid by each club. The ceiling may allow some flexibility, depending on the details. Generally, the aggregate salaries of each team are determined by an agreed upon formula and must remain above a minimum percentage of industry revenues, also determined by an agreed upon formula, but below a maximum percentage of those revenues. See Wood v. National Basketball Ass'n , 809 F.2d 954, 957 (2d Cir. 1987). The PRC proposal also eliminated the salary arbitration system and substituted restricted free agency rights for those reserved players previously eligible for salary arbitration. As an alternative to the PRC's proposed salary cap, the Players Association suggested a revenue sharing and luxury "tax" plan that would impose a tax on high-paying clubs. Subsequent proposals reflected disagreement over appropriate tax rates and payroll thresholds above which clubs would be subject to the tax. See Silverman , 880 F.2d at 251-52.

The players struck on August 12, and the 1994 baseball season never resumed. On December 22, 1994, the PRC declared an impasse in negotiations and stated that it intended unilaterally to impose a salary cap and to implement other changes in the terms and conditions of employment, including the elimination of salary arbitration. See Silverman , 880 F.2d at 252. The Players Association responded with a unilateral ban on players signing individual contracts with the Clubs.

Thereafter, cross-charges of unfair labor practices were filed with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") by the Players Association and the Clubs. The Players Association alleged that the Clubs had engaged in unfair labor practices by unilaterally implementing the salary cap and other terms because the parties were not at an impasse.

On February 3, 1995, counsel for the PRC notified the NLRB General Counsel that the PRC would revoke the implementation of unilateral changes and restore the status quo ante. The General Counsel indicated that the Players Association charges would be dismissed as a result. Counsel for the PRC informed the General Counsel, however, that the PRC did not believe itself obligated to maintain provisions of the Basic Agreement that involved non-mandatory subjects of bargaining. He mentioned salary arbitration in that regard and also suggested that the Clubs might decide to bargain exclusively through the PRC. The NLRB General Counsel declined to offer an advisory opinion on these matters.

Three days later, by memorandum dated February 6, counsel for the PRC notified the Clubs that, until a new collective bargaining agreement was ratified or until further notice, individual clubs had no authority to negotiate contracts with individual players because the PRC was now the Clubs' exclusive bargaining representative. This amounted to an agreement among the Clubs not to hire free agents and thus was a departure from the anti-collusion provision, Article XX(F) of the Basic Agreement. It also amounted to an elimination of salary arbitration, because salary arbitration is a method of arriving at a wage for an individual player contract with a club.

The Players Association thereupon filed a new unfair labor practice charge, and the General Counsel issued a complaint alleging, inter alia , that the Clubs and the PRC had violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (5) of the NLRA by unilaterally eliminating, before an impasse had been reached, competitive bidding for the services of free agents, the anti-collusion provision, and salary arbitration for certain reserved players. The NLRB found that these matters were related to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment and were therefore mandatory subjects for collective bargaining. It then authorized its General Counsel to seek an injunction under NLRA §10(j). On March 27, the NLRB Regional Director filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction restraining the alleged unfair labor practices.

The district court agreed that the NLRB had reasonable cause to conclude that free agency and salary arbitration were mandatory subjects of bargaining and that the Clubs' unilateral actions constituted an unfair labor practice. The district court also concluded that injunctive relief was warranted. This appeal followed. We denied a stay on April 4.


The NLRB is authorized under Section 10(j) of the NLRA to petition for temporary injunctive relief from a district court to enjoin ongoing unfair labor practices. 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). If the court has reasonable cause to believe that an unfair labor practice has occurred and that injunctive relief would be just and proper, it should grant appropriate relief. Kaynard v. MMIC, Inc. , 734 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir. 1984). The court need not make a final determination that the conduct in question is an unfair labor practice. Kaynard v. Mego Corp. , 633 F.2d 1026, 1033 (2d Cir. 1980). It need find only reasonable cause to support such a conclusion. See id. ; MMIC , 734 F.2d at 953. Appropriate deference must be shown to the judgment of the NLRB, and a district court should decline to grant relief only if convinced that the NLRB's legal or factual theories are fatally flawed. See Mego , 633 F.2d at 1031, 1033; Kaynard v. Palby Lingerie, Inc. , 625 F.2d 1047, 1051 (2d Cir. 1980). In reviewing a district court's grant of injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j), a court of appeals must also accord deference to the district court's decision, at least with regard to those aspects that are traditionally left to the district court's discretion. Mego , 633 F.2d at 1030.

We turn now to the merits of the regional director's petition. The petition invokes basic principles of labor law. Section 8(d) of the NLRA mandates that employers and unions bargain in good faith over "wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment." 29 U.S.C. § 158(d). These are so-called mandatory subjects of bargaining. Under caselaw, the parties may propose and bargain over, but may not insist upon, permissive subjects of bargaining. NLRB v. Wooster Div. of Borg-Warner Corp. , 356 U.S. 342, 349 (1958). When a collective agreement expires, an employer may not alter terms and conditions of employment involving mandatory subjects until it has bargained to an impasse over new terms. NLRB v. Katz , 369 U.S. 736, 741-43 (1962). Thereafter, it may implement the new terms. Generally, when an agreement expires, an employer need not bargain to an impasse over terms and conditions involving permissive subjects but may alter them upon expiration. Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. , 404 U.S. 157, 187-88 (1971).

Many of the usual issues that arise in impasse cases are not disputed in the instant matter. The parties agree that the PRC, in directing the Clubs to decline to bargain individually with free agents, unilaterally departed from much of Article XX, which provides for a limited form of free agency and forbids collusive behavior by the Clubs in negotiating with free agents. It is also undisputed that the PRC unilaterally departed from the Basic Agreement's provisions with regard to salary arbitration. The PRC does not claim that it had bargained to an impasse over the free agency, the anti-collusion, or the salary arbitration provisions. Finally, it is also agreed that, if those provisions involved mandatory subjects of bargaining, their unilateral abrogation before impasse was a refusal to bargain in good faith. The PRC and the Clubs argue that the anti-collusion and free agency provisions of the Basic Agreement do not involve mandatory subjects of bargaining and are therefore not subject to the Katz rule that unilateral implementation of new terms is an unfair labor practice unless the employer has bargained to an impasse over these new terms. See Silverman , 880 F. Supp. at 254. The PRC and the Clubs contend that an injunction compelling them to maintain the free agency and anti-collusion provisions undermines their right as a multiemployer group to bargain collectively through an exclusive representative. If so, they would be permissive subjects of bargaining. See Borg Warner , 356 U.S. at 349 . With regard to salary arbitration, the PRC and the Clubs argue that it is the equivalent of interest arbitration -- arbitration of the terms of a new collective agreement -- and thus not a mandatory subject of bargaining. See International Bhd. of Elec. Workers (Collier Elec. Co.) , 296 N.L.R.B. 1095, 1098 (1989).

We are unpersuaded that an injunction compelling the PRC and the Clubs to observe the anti-collusion and free agency provisions of the Basic Agreement infringes on their right as a multiemployer group to bargain through an exclusive representative. Free agency and the ban on collusion are one part of a complex method -- agreed upon in collective bargaining -- by which each major league player's salary is determined under the Basic Agreement. They are analogous to the use of seniority, hours of work, merit increases, or piece work to determine salaries in an industrial context. The PRC and the Clubs describe free agency and the ban on collusion as provisions undermining their right to select a joint bargaining representative because those provisions entail individual contracts with clubs. However, the argument ignores the fact that free agency is simply a collectively bargained method of determining individual salaries for one group of players. The anti-collusion provision is not designed to prevent the PRC from representing the Clubs. Rather, that provision guarantees that free agency will be a reality when permitted by the Basic Agreement. The injunction thus does not in any way prevent the PRC from bargaining as the Clubs' exclusive representative with the Players Association over the elimination of free agency in its entirety or for a modified version of the same, and thereafter from implementing any proposals incorporated into a collective bargaining agreement.

The question, therefore, is whether the free agency, anti-collusion, and reserve issues are -- or there is reasonable cause to believe they are -- otherwise mandatory subjects of bargaining. Section 8(d) of the NLRA defines the duty to bargain as "the obligation . . . to meet . . . and confer in good faith with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment . . . ." In Wood v. Nat'l Basketball Ass'n , 809 F.2d 954 (2d Cir. 1987), we noted that free agency and reserve issues are "at the center of collective bargaining in much of the professional sports industry," id. at 961, and that "it is precisely because of [free agency's] direct relationship to wages and conditions of employment that [it is] so controversial and so much the focus of bargaining in professional sports." Id. at 962.

Wood noted that collective bargaining between professional athletes and leagues raises "numerous problems with little or no precedent in standard industrial relations." Id. at 961. Such is the case with a free agency and reserve system. For the most part, unionized employees in the industrial sector may leave one employer for another without restriction. The employee may have no bargaining rights with regard to the terms of hire by the new employer, which may be set by a collective agreement, but is nevertheless generally free to go from one unionized job to another. [1]  

The professional sports industry has a very different history and very different economic imperatives. Most professional sports leagues have always had some form of what has become known as the reserve system. See Flood v. Kuhn , 407 U.S. 258, 259 n.1 (1972) (baseball); Robertson v. National Basketball Ass'n , 556 F.2d 682, 686 n.6 (2d Cir. 1977) (basketball); Mackey v. National Football League , 543 F.2d 606, 610 (8th Cir. 1976) (football), cert. dismissed , 434 U.S. 801 (1977); McCourt v. California Sports, Inc. , 600 F.2d 1193, 1194 (6th Cir. 1979) (hockey). As noted, this is a system by which the right to a player's services becomes the property of a particular club with limited freedom for the player to seek employment with another club. The reserve system in one form or another has been used in major league baseball for over a century. Until the arbitration decision in 1976, the reserve system prevented players from offering their athletic services to competing teams. A player's services were thus the property of a single team until he was traded or released. In enforcing a complete reserve system, Major League Baseball was exercising monopsony power -- a buyer's monopoly.

However, there are many reasons, apart from maximizing the transfer of revenues from players to clubs, why reserve systems exist within professional sports. Fans might not be interested in games between teams that had entirely new lineups for every contest. Moreover, high quality play may require that individuals practice and play with the same teammates for at least some period of time. Teams may also want to recoup what they regard as training costs invested in players while they gained experience. In antitrust litigation, the leagues perennially argue that some form of reserve system is necessary for competitive balance. See Mackey , 543 F.2d at 611. Indeed, even in a system of complete free agency, one would expect to see many long-term agreements binding individual players to particular clubs.

There are also reasons, apart from maximizing the transfer of revenues to players, why a union of professional athletes would seek free agency. It is very difficult to set individual salaries in professional sports through collective bargaining. Although unions of professional athletes may bargain for uniform benefits and minimum salaries, they do not usually follow their industrial counterparts and seek relatively fixed salaries by job description, seniority, or other formulae. Players often play positions requiring very different skills. Moreover, the level of performance and value to a team in attracting fans differs radically among players, with star athletes or popular players being far more valuable than sub-par or nondescript players. Usually, therefore, players unions seek some form of free agency as a relatively simple method of setting individual salaries.

Most importantly, however, both the leagues and the players unions view free agency and reserve issues as questions of what share of revenues go to the clubs or to the players. The more restrictive the reserve system is, the greater the clubs' share. The greater the role of free agency, the greater the players' share.

To hold that there is no reasonable cause for the NLRB to conclude that free agency and reserve issues are mandatory subjects of bargaining would be virtually to ignore the history and economic imperatives of collective bargaining in professional sports. A mix of free agency and reserve clauses combined with other provisions is the universal method by which leagues and players unions set individual salaries in professional sports. Free agency for veteran players may thus be combined with a reserve system, as in baseball, or a rookie draft, as in basketball, see Wood , 809 F.2d at 957, for newer players. A salary cap may or may not be included. See id. To hold that any of these items, or others that make up the mix in a particular sport, is merely a permissive subject of bargaining would ignore the reality of collective bargaining in sports.

Indeed, free agency is in many ways nothing but the flip side of the reserve system. A full reserve system does not eliminate individual bargaining between teams and players. It simply limits that bargaining to one team. If free agency were a permissive subject of collective bargaining, then so would be the reserve system.

With regard to salary arbitration, we will assume, but not decide, that if it is a form of interest arbitration, it may be unilaterally eliminated. See George Koch & Sons, Inc. , 306 N.L.R.B. 834, 839 (1992) (interest arbitration permissive subject of bargaining). Interest arbitration is a method by which an employer and union reach new agreements by sending disputed issues to an arbitrator rather than settling them through collective bargaining and economic force. See New York Typographical Union No. 6 v. Printers League , 919 F.2d 3 n.2 (2d Cir. 1990). The salary arbitration provisions of the Basic Agreement are a method by which salaries for some players who are not eligible for free agency -- those with three to six years of major league service -- are set. The Basic Agreement sets forth criteria by which the arbitrator is to reach a decision. These criteria include the player's performance in the prior year, the length and consistency of career contribution, physical or mental defects, recent performance of the team on the field and at the gate, and salaries of certain comparable players. The Basic Agreement also forbids the arbitrator from considering certain facts that might otherwise be relevant. Finally, the Basic Agreement requires that the arbitrator pick either the club's suggested salary or the player's.

We decline to analogize Article VI(f) of the Basic Agreement to interest arbitration. Salary arbitration provides limited discretion to the arbitrator to set salaries for designated players who are not eligible for free agency. The discretion afforded the arbitrator is arguably less than the discretion afforded arbitrators in grievance arbitration involving disputes arising under an existing collective agreement, which is beyond question a mandatory subject of bargaining. In grievance arbitration, an arbitrator may permissibly imply a term even though the term has no explicit support in the text of the collective agreement. See United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. , 363 U.S. 574, 581-82 (1960) ("The labor arbitrator's source of law is not confined to the express provisions of the contract, as the industrial common law -- the practices of the industry and the shop -- is equally a part of the collective bargaining agreement although not expressed in it."); see also Holly Sugar Corp. v. Distillery, Rectifying, Wine & Allied Workers Int'l Union , 412 F.2d 899, 903 (9th Cir. 1969). Similarly, a term may be implied from past practices even though somewhat inconsistent with the agreement. See International Chem. Workers Union, Local No. 278 v. Imco Container Co. , 78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2014 (S.D. Ind. 1971). We thus decline to analogize salary arbitration to interest arbitration, and, therefore, we hold that there is reasonable cause to believe that it is a mandatory subject of bargaining.

With regard to whether the granting of relief was "just and proper," 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), we review the district court's determination only for abuse of discretion. Mego , 633 F.2d at 1030; Palby Lingerie , 625 F.2d at 1051. We see no such abuse in the present matter. Given the short careers of professional athletes and the deterioration of physical abilities through aging, the irreparable harm requirement has been met. The unilateral elimination of free agency and salary arbitration followed by just three days a promise to restore the status quo. The PRC decided to settle the original unfair labor practice charges while embarking on a course of action based on a fallacious view of the duty to bargain. We see no reason to relieve it of the consequences of that course.

We therefore affirm.



Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?