cialis online lloyds diflucan 1oo mg clomid 100mg chances valtrex ordering cialis 5 mg 14 original cialis cheap prednisone 1 mg tablets nexium 40 mg inyectable levitra filmtabletten 5 mg cheap cialis medication synthroid 225 mg buy cialis cina zovirax acyclovir generic buy zoloft 50 mg nexium 30 count 40 mg propecia generic patent buy generic zoloft anxiety disorder wellbutrin 100 mg of prednisone doxycycline 500mg 28 lexapro generic side taking 25mg clomid lisinopril 40 mg watson generic cialis rayh viagra 100mg 16 viagra online kroger answers online viagra prednisone panic disorder generic to cialis nexium 10 mg granulado levitra 10 mg opinioni zithromax uk buy 20mg nolvadex day nexium price 20 mg overdose propranolol 10 mg generic viagra 2011 viagra online china provames 2mg clomid strattera dosage 80 mg taking 40 mg cialis kegunaan nexium 40mg generic cialis 2.5 mg. ordering doxycycline online 100 mg artificial viagra propecia 5 mg uk take 500 mg valtrex clomid 100mg bfp 800 mg cialis reviews cheap nexium 40 mg viagra online ads generico viagra bula cialis online ricetta kamagra apotheke online kamagra online australia viagra generico cialis best generic doxycycline levitra 10mg forum viagra 4 filmtbl 100 mg lexapro 10 mg forum lexapro 15mg generico buying viagra soho priligy 60 mg erfahrung buy mygra viagra strattera generic cost cialis 100 mg overnight kamagra shop online priligy 30 mg indicazioni propecia cheap drugs 20mg lexapro dose buy nolvadex steroids 25 mg of prednisone get valtrex online buy cipro nexium esomeprazole 10 mg cialis 20mgcanada goodrx cheapest viagra diflucan 150 mg tab cipro xl mg zovirax online canada anxiety disorders zoloft posologia cialis 10 mg clomid 150 mg pcos levitra buy cheap 6 cheap propecia online 2.5 mgs lexapro cialis generic effective buying cialis forums propranolol 40 mg costo celebrex 20mg online propecia prescription kamagra gel 20 mg cialis price generic lexapro 20 mg presentacion free cialis 20mg zoloft online prescription metformin al 1000 mg cialis pills order golden viagra 3800 mg zithromax generic available medikament celebrex 100 mg phenergan 12.5mg 250 mg of erythromycin asda generic viagra generic viagra professional cialis 40mg australia 20mg levitra canada viagra 100mgusa generic super cialis clomid 50mg pregnant fast online viagra cialis da 40 mg buy amoxil 875 zoloft 75 mg tabs strattera 40 mg price generic viagra drugs costo levitra 5 mg mg of synthroid cialis online italy valtrex 100mg zithromax buy online medicamento augmentin 500 mg nexium generic form prednisone 20 mg bid viagra 100 mg 2 compresse lexapro 30 mg tablet erythromycin ethylsuccinate 800 mg cialis 5mg 100 pills celebrex 200mg preis 20 mg. prednisone tablets online synthroid metformin online australia diflucan da 100 mg cheapest dapoxetine nexium 40 mg 28 tb viagra 150mg cheap lloyds cialis online propranolol 40 mg dawkowanie propecia generic work cialis 5mg package cytotec online buy buy cialis brampton pct clomid online arrested buying cialis qualitest lisinopril 10 mg generic lisinopril 20 mg cialis buy now lexapro 40mg prednisone 20 mg sinus forums generic viagra zovirax obat generic australian cialis buy Buy Levitra pill makes generic cialis order cheap cialis cialis 5mg pharmacie cialis 5mg tablet online pfizer viagra cumpara cialis online levitra 20mg einnahme anwendung xenical 120 mg 50mg vs 100 viagra levitra 20 mg test xenical 120 mg romania online viagra thailand nolvadex tablet 30mg buying generic lexapro 150 mg viagra dangerous buy viagra athens opinioni cialis 5 mg propecia 1 mg effectiveness clomid online soon buy viagra jelly doxycycline 400 mg safe online ordering viagra valtrex buy cheap viagra farmaci generici zithromax sirop300mg bactrim forte 500 mg costo viagra 25 mg 1750 mg augmentin generic viagra chinatown viagra 50mg drunk generic viagra good taking 25 mg viagra farmaco cialis generico viagra 25 mg pret levitra 20mg longevity viagra jet 20 mg cialis 1 mg generic cialis research comprare cialis 40 mg doxycycline 100 mg 14 caps levitra original 40 mg nexium generic product xenical generico chile viagra 100 mg teilbar 800 mg viagra gold lisinopril 5 mg dosis price cialis online propranolol 20 mg pliva forum priligy generico buy viagra online 35008 nexium capsule 40 mg cialis pricing online prednisone 5mg online clomid 400 mg zovirax pills 200 mg zithromax online order erythromycin tab 500mg bactrim ds order generic wellbutrin 150 mg generic cialis illegal generic cialis berlin viagra buy budapest viagra online issues cialis cheap overnight nexium 40mg diarreia propranolol 40 mg migraines phenergan dosage 10mg generic cialis 40 cheap strattera 10 mg capsules lasix 40 mg jugoremedija propecia .5mg 2013 buy lasix tablets prednisone 5 mg posologie generic synthroid strengths cipro 800 mg buy priligy paypal cialis 5mg 120 cheap cialis jelly metformin tablets buy priligy uk buy metformin 500 mg image prednisone 4 mg dosepak clomid 50 mg results zithromax online purchase order cialis 2.5 mg prix viagra 50mg viagra harrow buy online levitra prices get cheap cialis propranolol 10mg migraine buy zovirax capsule buy zovirax walgreens cheap kamagra online commander cialis generic nexium 20 mg cp strattera buy paypal cheap levitra walgren propranolol 100mg amoxil 400 mg suspension cialis 5mg davkovanie phenergan 12.5 mg suppository cialis 40mg efahrung thuoc nexium 002 mg 50mg clomid pcos wellbutrin 450 mg day nexium 40mg n28 lisinopril 10mg pill buspar 5 mg tablet wellbutrin 300 mg online levitra 20 mg posologie bactrim jarabe 200 40 mg cialis 600 mg dawkowanie doxycycline my 100mg erythromycin 1000 mg granulat cheap zovirax canada buy propranolol hydrochloride doxycycline cheap online cialis 20mg brand lisinopril 20 12.5 mg kamagra 150mg dosage viagra 8000mg clomid 100 mg online viagra 220 mg cialis 20mg 30 tablet zithromax 500mg venta xenical online cialis 5mg only zithromax online eu 40 mg lasix im 150mg viagra online levitra generic not canadian levitra generic valtrex 500mg caplet lexapro buy generic buy propecia pills buy tijuana viagra augmentin 375 mg used diflucan prescription online local cheap cialis propranolol tablets 40mg counterfeit cialis 50mg doxycycline 100 mg ulotka sildenafil viagra 100mg generic viagra cena online paypal propecia levitra generic uk viagra very cheap kamagra dubai buy tadalafil cialis 200mg online pharmacy xenical cialis take 4 5mg synthroid .5mg viagra online shoping koop propecia online order doxycycline 100 mg costi cialis generico lupin generic zoloft 20mg cialis nitroboosters tetracycline mail order valtrex tabletas 500 mg nz cheap cialis viagra order australia viagra 50 mg wikipedia glucophage generico 20mg lexapro daily buy zithromax paypal augmentin 228 mg dosage buy 40 mg lisinopril strattera 60 mg overdose buy viagra berlin mylan nolvadex buy billig cialis 20mg augmentin generic substitute viagra online gel prednisone 20 mg instructions generic cialis youtube generic to strattera generic cialis pro viagra directions 100 mg buy zithromax 500mg nexium online compare 5 mg propranolol anxiety buy nexium internet kamagra goedkoop online cheap cialis 5mg viagra... cialis 20mg ordering doxycycline antibiotics buy generic lexapro free 20 mg cialis zithromax generic dose wellbutrin generic dosages levitra tablets 100mg levitra generico italia clomid online uk 25 mg zoloft reviews 300 mg doxycycline acne generic of viagra liquid zithromax buy lasix 50 mg lisinopril 800mg 2.5mg citalopram fake viagra 50mg lexapro 10 mg valor sell kamagra online generic viagra 200mg cheapest 20mg cialis cheap 150 mg viagra generic wellbutrin problems 2012 lexapro 5mg weight propranolol 40mg lch generic wellbutrin warning traitement cialis 5mg generic cialis answers prednisone mylan 20 mg superactive cialis 20mg viagra mexico generico levitra 10 mg contraindicaciones cialis 20mg marseille buspar dosage 90 mg reputable online viagra lisinopril overdose 40 mg buy viagra indonesia buy phenergan cream phenergan 50 mg bula cialis 5mg buy 100 mg levitra viagra 0.25 mg forum generic lisinopril identification levitra cheapest online viagra amsterdam buy xenical 120 mg prospecto buy tetracycline 250 mg cialis 200 mg srbija prospect nexium 20 mg cialis generika 5 mg cialis online authentic clomid pcos 50mg generic viagra stores 50 mg of cialis lexapro generic reviews 2012 ranbaxy nexium generic levitra 20 mg prescription doxycycline calcium 50 mg cost generic propecia 50 mg cialis longs canadian dapoxetine online danger 20 mg levitra levitra 20mg generika cialis 5 mg cena cialis 10mg fta4 generic viagra 150 mg bactrim antibiotic online levitra 10 mg bayer doxycycline 800 mg cialis generico funciona 100mg. vardenafil levitra levitra 20mg nebenwirkungen buy viagra lloyds prix doxycycline 100mg kamagra fast order zithromax online overnight cialis 5mg turkey cialis 2.5mg daily pastilla doxycycline 100mg tapering prednisone 10 mg diflucan 100 mg cost nexium 40mg jejum buy zithromax 500 mg zovirax pills online generic 25 mg viagra generic propranolol medication xenical mg viagra 50mg rezeptfrei generic viagra review 2012 glucophage 500 mg metformin buy 40 mg cialis 10 mg generic cialis ubat metformin 500 mg nolvadex tamoxifen buy cumpar xenical online levitra 40 mg reviews doxycycline 50 mg reviews metformin actavis 1000 mg cheap generic valtrex cialis veilig online fungsi zovirax 200mg generic cialis double levitra 2 5 mg 60 mg prednisone dosage inj lasix 40 mg glucophage xr 500mg amiloride hydrochlorothiazide generic viagra gold online valtrex cream generic 10mg cialis generic viagra cheap cheap lexapro 5mg dose cialis mail order cialis 36 hour generic zoloft 50 mgs cheapest professional viagra propecia online sales generic viagra ciple acquisto cialis 20 mg wellbutrin 150 mg daily levitra 20mg teilen synthroid generic brand propranolol 40 mg dosis valtrex generic version buy azithromycin zithromax koop cialis online doxycycline 100mg skin zithromax 500 mg uses cialis 2.5mg australia viagra pills 100 mg cialis buy tesco viagra 100 mg effectiveness wellbutrin xl 150 mg cialis 5mg uk viagra 30 pills 100 mg propranolol to buy cialis buy jakarta cialis su generico prednisone 20 mg steroids cialis difference mg diflucan online purchase propecia generic alternative viagra 12 mg online levitra prescription buy propecia eu cialis generico ems 5000 mg viagra strattera 160 mg study 500 mg prednisone sublingual cialis 40mg doxycycline 100 mg dog effet cialis 10mg buy cialis lloyds generic levitra europe buy .99 generic viagra lexapro become generic buy cialis romania buy nexium india cialis 2.5 mg buy viagra generic lowest cialis 20 mg faq generics of viagra order zithromax pfizer
Home Pete Toms Sports Marketing is the Recession’s New Whipping Boy

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 466 guests online

Atom RSS

Sports Marketing is the Recession’s New Whipping Boy PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 94
PoorBest 
Pete Toms Article Archive
Written by Pete Toms   
Thursday, 05 March 2009 01:23

A Biz of Baseball OriginalSports marketing is the recession’s new whipping boy.

That is a quote from a report in this week’s SportsBusiness Journal on the backlash against the TARP assisted financial services sector’s sponsorship of professional sports. This past week saw a media and political outcry over Northern Trust’s sponsorship of a PGA tournament in Los Angeles and BofA walking away from a nearly concluded sponsorship of the new Yankee Stadium. Corporate sponsorships have been an important contributor to the record revenues generated in recent years by professional sports. Stadium naming rights, luxury suites, premium seats, signage, TV advertising, tournament sponsorships etc., are all under duress in a climate where corporations fear being perceived as irresponsible and ostentatious.

In January, IEG Sponsorship Report predicted that sports sponsorship growth in 09 will be less than 2%, compared to growth of 14.7% in 08. According to IEG, “...sports will account for 68 percent of the $17 billion North American sponsorship market.” Weekly Standard contributor Jonathan V Last wrote in the WSJ.

In recent years, teams have also become reliant on revenue from corporate clients, in the form of naming rights and luxury-box purchases. Nationwide, corporations spend roughly $10 billion a year on sports sponsorships. Those should be the first expenditures ditched by any company looking to save money.    

The February 09 Metropolitan Corporate Counsel published an article by Jordan S. Solomon which discussed the potential impacts of diminished corporate sports sponsorships and the difficulties in justifying their existence in recessionary times.

2008 will be remembered (not too fondly) as the year the housing bubble and the credit bubble burst. One casualty of these bubbles bursting and the resulting global recession has been a decline in corporate sports sponsorships. As a result, the sports bubble may be the next to burst, adversely affecting the sports stars and teams we root for.

Corporate sports sponsorships are declining rapidly, particularly in industries hardest hit by the credit crisis, such as the automobile and financial services industries. According to data from the sponsorship agency IEG, global sports sponsorships doubled in the past ten years to about $30 billion annually. These dollars have caused stars such as Tiger Woods, David Beckham, and even lesser known sports personalities to become rich and famous. This massive spending has also enabled sports teams and leagues to realize tremendous profits, as well as fuel the creation, development and expansion of new sports leagues and teams. Due to declining sports sponsorships, many of these new leagues and teams will not survive.

Some of the biggest players in the sports sponsorship industry, such as General Motors, Honda, Wachovia and Merrill Lynch, have suffered severe financial losses from the economic downturn, and in some cases are no longer in business. In these situations, these companies are under huge pressure to cut costs, and marketing budgets (in particular sports sponsorships) are often the first to be cut. These sponsorships are viewed as excessive when a company is losing billions of dollars, laying off employees and asking for a government bailout.

[...]

One of the factors in the decline in sports sponsorships is that the benefits of such sponsorships are difficult to quantify for the sponsor, even in good financial times. When times are good, sports sponsorship is an opportunity for building a reputation (i.e., brand), as well as generating high-level corporate entertainment, such as a sponsor's hospitality tent at a golf tournament. A company's name and logo displayed on signage at sports arenas, on uniforms and during TV broadcasts provides tremendous exposure of the company's brand. Free tickets and other access to sports teams and players that often accompany a sponsorship can be used as an incentive to employees or as an inducement to clients, governmental officials and suppliers. However, the benefit to a company's bottom line is difficult to measure, and these incentives are even harder to justify during a recession when the company is cutting jobs and losing business.

Select Read More to see the rest of this article.

The scrutiny of corporate sports sponsorships by media and politicians has greatly intensified since the two aforementioned traditionally largest sponsorship categories - financial services and automotive – have received TARP assistance. With both industries receiving hundreds of billions of public dollars, there is much debate concerning the value (if any, according to some) of these sponsorships. Citigroup’s $400 million naming rights deal for the Mets new stadium was the flashpoint in the media and political uproar over the legitimacy of TARP money being used (or not), for sports sponsorships . David Carter, executive director of the Sports Business Institute at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, said of Citigroup’s naming rights deal for “Citi Field”, “It’s quickly becoming the sports-marketing poster child for the entire financial meltdown,” And from the aforementioned SBJ report, “It’s all about Citi Field,” said Rich Gotham, president of the Boston Celtics, who have a sponsorship with TD Banknorth. “If that wasn’t out there while Citi is crashing and the government is bailing them out [with $45 billion in TARP funding] this all wouldn’t be so topical.”

Perhaps the most obvious sign of the high public profile of this issue was TMZ’s derisive coverage of Northern Trust’s sponsorship of the recently concluded PGA tournament in Los Angeles. The TMZ reports inspired a spate of media and political reactions which were a carbon copy of much of the negative response to the Citigroup/Citi Field deal. In both instances (NT & Citigroup), politicians from different levels of government and of opposing philosophies united in their opposition to the deals.  Maury Brown reported in November that Republican NYC Council members Vincent Ignizio and James Oddo had publicly criticized the “Citi Field” sponsorship. The same report quoted Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), "This type of spending is indefensible and unacceptable to Citigroup's new partner and largest investor: the American taxpayer." Steve Bilafer wrote:

Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, has a 100 percent rating from the Christian Coalition and Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, has a 100 percent rating from the ACLU. You can bet they don’t agree on much. So, what unites one of the most conservative members of Congress with one of the most liberal? Stadium naming rights, of course. Citibank’s deal with the Mets to name their new stadium Citi Field has been under fire since the bank’s financial problems surfaced last fall. On Jan. 28, Poe and Kucinich sent a letter to new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner asking him to void the bank’s stadium deal with the Mets.

Three days after the Northern Trust sponsored golf tournament concluded, Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee was quoted in this NY Times report.

“Marketing expenses should be for real marketing, not ego boosts, which is what I think naming rights are,” Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said Wednesday in a telephone interview. “Important men, in particular, like to hang out and ingratiate themselves with sports figures, and after the fact try to figure out how to make sense of the sponsorships as marketing or economic development.”

From the same report.

On Tuesday, Frank sent a letter to Northern Trust Bank in Chicago, a recipient of $1.58 billion of TARP funds, demanding that it reimburse the government for the lavish entertainment and hospitality it treated clients and employees to during the PGA Tour’s Northern Trust Open last weekend at Riviera Country Club in Los Angeles

The WSJ reported on the Northern Trust backlash.

Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly hopped on the bandwagon Thursday, commending Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts (an unlikely bedfellow) for proposing legislation that "would prevent any recipient of TARP funds from hosting, sponsoring, or paying for conferences, holiday parties and entertainment events."

NY Times columnist Maureen Dowd was “teed off”.

Coming in a moment when skeptical and angry Americans watched A.I.G., Citigroup, General Motors and Chrysler — firms that had already been given a federal steroid injection — get back in line for more billions, the golf scandal was just one more sign that the bailed-out rich are different from you and me: their appetites are unquenchable and their culture is uneducable.

Criticism of the relationships between TARP assisted banks and professional sports has not been limited to Northern Trust and Citigroup. Forbes’ Mike Ozanian;

President Obama wants to cap pay for CEOs of banks that take TARP money at $500,000. I figure that means Bud Selig owes Obama at least $17 million. Selig raked in $17.5 million in compensation for being commissioner of Major League Baseball in 2007,.......

Selig’s rich bounty......is due to baseball’s revenue surge since he took over as acting commissioner in 1992. As a capitalist I have no problem with that. But a lot of the sport’s revenue—and therefore Selig’s compensation—is from advertising and sponsorships from banks that have received Tarp money, like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and PNC. Mr. Commissioner, either take a huge pay cut or fork over $17 million to the president.

The banks, sports marketing agencies and some business reporters have defended the TARP assisted banks sports sponsorship deals. The arguments in favour of these deals typically stem from four themes; the banks didn’t ask for TARP money, (Mr. Frank countered, “They can give it back”) no TARP money is being spent on sports marketing, sports sponsorships are good business and yield a substantial ROI and the banks – without political interference – require the latitude to unilaterally allocate their marketing resources in order to succeed.

From the aforementioned WSJ piece by John Paul Newport; “...last year Northern Trust accepted $1.6 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program funds, despite record profits of $795 million and a solid balance sheet. The bank, in a letter to shareholders this week, said it didn't seek the funds but accepted them to accommodate "the government's goal of gaining the participation of all major banks in the United States." From the aforementioned NY Times report on Barney Frank’s reaction to the Northern Trust PGA sponsorship; “The bank said in a statement that it did not seek, but still accepted, the government’s bailout money, and did not use any of it at the tournament.” Bloomberg reported, “No TARP capital will be used for Citi Field or for marketing purposes,” Citigroup said in a statement on Feb 3.

Darren Rovell reported that, “A Bank of America official told us that for every $1 they spend on sports marketing, they net $3. They also said that out of all the new checking accounts that were opened in 2008, 10 percent of those were attributed to their sports marketing programs.”

Forbes’ Tom Van Riper defended the Citi Field sponsorship.

Stadium naming rights deals make money, at least when they're done right. In addition to the general exposure, a company like Citi gets its foot in the door to handle all of the banking for the team and the venue, access to players and their agents and a place to drum up business with other team sponsors in the corporate suites.

[...]

Front Row Analytics, a consultancy that helps sports franchises value sponsorships, says television exposure in New York media market is a $15 million annual value for Citi, 75% of the $20 million the company is paying the Mets. Throw in national television (the Mets are scheduled for at least 10 games on ESPN and Fox, more if they make the postseason), on-site signage exposure, plus the revenue potential from stadium ATMs and suite deals with other sponsors, and Citi is well into the black. The estimated value from hosting an All-Star Game, which is likely in a new park's early years, is $11 million.

[...]

Citigroup's total deal with the Mets is equal to less than 1% of the $45 billion in TARP funds the company is due to receive. The current mess exacerbates the bank's need for profit making, and that means marketing. Like it or not, the company stands a better chance of repaying taxpayers with the Mets than without them.

From Anthony Rieber at Newsday:

David Carter, executive director of the University of Southern California's Sports Business Institute and an assistant professor of sports business at the Marshall School of Business, said even a public relations backlash directed at Citibank wouldn't cripple the business because the everyday consumer is not the prime target of a naming-rights deal. Other businesses are.

"The behind-the-scenes business development that takes place at these [sports] events is pretty amazing, but we never see it," Carter said. "We spend so much time wondering as end users whether it makes sense for a company to put their name on a building. ... Comprehensive naming-rights deals really are good for business, so you have to weigh the public relations challenges. Sports marketing has helped companies generate revenue and shareholder value for a long time."

In a separate post, Darren Rovell defended the Citi Field deal, “To give the folks at Citi the TARP money and then say that they can't market their retail banking operation actually doesn't make much sense.”

Sarah Talalay questioned if criticisms of the Citi Field deal were defensible.

But the question remains: should companies that receive federal bailouts be putting big money into these types of naming rights deals?

The question arose after Sept. 11, 2001, when the airline industry was laying off workers and seeking federal help, and yet several stadiums and arenas, including AmericanAirlines Arena in Miami, bore the names of air carriers.

The conventional wisdom from the business community tends to be that in difficult times, companies should be spending a portion of their budgets on advertising, since that’s when they need it most.

Casey Wasserman, CEO of Wasserman Media Group, appeared on CNBC to defend sports marketing in light of the negative publicity created by the Northern Trust PGA sponsorship. (WMG has varied interests in professional sports and amongst them is selling stadium naming rights) The discussion revealed the degree of bitterness in the debate, with Mr. Wasserman pointing out that Mr. Frank accepts political donations from some of the same TARP assisted banks that he criticized for their sports sponsorship deals. Subsequent to Mr. Wasserman’s CNBC interview, Darren Rovell posted a list of Mr. Frank’s top corporate contributors.

Stadium naming rights is also on the radar screen of Miami politicians. Last month, City of Miami Commissioners voted 2-2 to proceed with plans for a new baseball stadium for the Florida Marlins. Marc Sarnoff, one of the commissioners opposing the plan, demanded that the Marlins agree to share with the city any revenues generated from the sale of stadium naming rights before he would consider supporting the project.

The recent political backlash against public investments in pro sports was also evident when Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla) introduced (albeit unsuccessfully) an amendment to the stimulus bill to prohibit any of the funds being used for stadiums.

There is speculation that the new Dallas Cowboys stadium will open in June without a naming rights sponsor. The Dallas Morning News reported last month:

When the Dallas Cowboys play their first game here later this year, team owner Jerry Jones might have a temporary name for his stadium and a lot less cash than he expected.

A naming rights deal to add hundreds of millions of dollars to his bottom line hasn't materialized, and sports business professionals said Jones might not find a sponsor this year unless he's willing to offer a deep discount. Even optimistic naming rights consultants are saying that a blockbuster deal is probably off the table in this year of economic turmoil.

The near future of sponsorship revenues is likely an acute concern to the NFL. SBJ recently reported, “According to internal league data, contracts accounting for 50 percent of all club sponsorship revenues come due within the next 18 months, so with a recession bringing every economic issue into sharp focus, the question being asked by industry executives gathered in Tampa and Orlando for Super Bowl week was whether the NFL’s golden years were behind it.”

The same set of challenges which led to the demise of the BofA sponsorship of the new Yankee Stadium are correlated with the Yankees’ stalled sales of premium seats and luxury suite leases. In both instances it is the corporate sector that is expected to purchase the inventories. In January the Yankees confirmed that they had contracted with a “Manhattan residential real estate brokerage” to assist in the marketing of premium seating.

In the midst of this public and political turmoil, Nielsen Media Research has released some figures that show banking companies have decreased spending by 10 percent over the last year, but have increased the amount that they are spending on sports advertisement by 36 percent in 2008, showing that these businesses see sports as great return on investment.

According to Nielsen, "Banks spent $122 million - or 18.7% of all its TV ad dollars - on sports event programming in 2008. In 2007, the banking industry spent $90 million on sports broadcasts, or 12.5% of the industry’s total TV ad expenditures."

 

Less than one year ago, professional sports was anticipating a group of stadium naming rights deals which would command unprecedented dollars. The Mets deal remains in place (at least temporarily) but has generated vast amounts of negative attention for the sponsor. The Yankees deal collapsed. Interest in the naming rights for the Cowboys and Giants/Jets stadiums appears slight. On a smaller scale, the Washington Nationals will soon begin their second season of play in Nationals Park, still with no naming rights sponsor.

BofA sponsorship chief Ray Bednar was quoted in SBJ, “We may have seen a sea change in the acceptable way to develop and nurture and maintain and grow relationships using client B2B entertainment.”

Whether or not that change is temporary or permanent will have an enormous impact on professional sports.

 


 

Pete Toms is an author for The Biz of Baseball and a staff member of the Business of Sports Network. He can be contacted at \n \n This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?