tesco pharmacy speman to buy pill nolvadex online fda approved online pet pharmacies prednisone 1000mg nexium alternatives cheaper what is cephalexin 500mg used for in humans acticin no prescription maximum prevacid dose for babies 1500 mg of valtrex powder zithromax 300 mg buy generic altace speman discounts codes pregnant prednisone 60 mg cipro hc rxlist metformin 500 mg benefits brand cialis 40mg buy nootropil 5 order genuine cialis medrol 4 mg tablet viagra generic hersteller brand hyzaar buy cheapest cialis australia 250 mg doxycycline acne viagra 300 mg online authentic viagra cialis generic 5 mg cialis 100 mg pills can i order buspar no prescription in the usa generico viagra yahoo cipro xl 1000mg lexapro 20 mg efficacy online cheap viagra doxycycline online shop augmentin 625 mg prospect zithromax 500 mg info phenergan tablets 25mg cheapest clomid 100mg pregnant viagra generic alternative online viagra tablet generic cialis ray buspar for anxiety attacks 365 pills coupon code lexapro patent generic taking two claritin pills generic buy cheap levothyroxine sodium lexapro 20mg bula teva generic lexapro propranolol sleep disorders sustiva non perscription countries pyridium canadian pharmacy do you need rx evista buy dapoxetine thailand xenical 120 mg wirkung advair online no prescription geriforte buy online ireland buy ditropan 40 zoloft 50 mg precio order liv 52 online uk cialis 5 mg o 10 viagra dosage 100mg onlinefarmacy generic speman overnite shipping buy zoloft america can you buy viagra over the counter in the uk generic nexium cheapest cialis australia 5mg fast wellbutrin sr deleviery soft cialis generic clomiphene citrate low testosterone buy viagra brisbane buy betnovate scalp application 100ml can you buy viagra soft in ireland canadian cialis online 1.00 prednisone 20 mg bid lexapro 10mg engorda januvia side effects weight gain zithromax 500 mg sport where can i buy nolvadex from in uk endep order by phone augmentin xr 1 mg 62.5 zoloft 50 mg recreational discount lioresal 12 generic sildenafil viagra generic viagra professional buy 50 mg clomid what does carafate have in it lisinopril tablets 20 mg chloramphenicol medication online is it safe to order nizagara metformin 1000 mg pills valtrex canadian medications without prescription compare prices zantac kemasan cialis 80mg pomegranate smoothie vitamix no generic premarin tricor uk online tricor discount card valtrex 500 mg glaxosmithkline lexapro generic escitalopram bactrim mg kg levitra 20 mg generic zocor paypal botanical slimming tablets gel order crestor online uk keppra cost canadian medicament xenical 120 mg cialis 10 mg etkisi buy nolvadex forum medrol dose pack common side effects prescription xenical online cheap zestril uk strattera 40 mg generic cheapest synthetic viagra is glucotrol xl a prescription drug purchase neurontin online aciphex drug classification femara letrozole buy no prescription taking trazodone without food nitroglycerin tablets rxlist prednisone 8 mg buy flagyl over the counter order florinef costo cialis generico buy strattera line lexapro 20mg canada what is the correct dosage of brand cialis can you buy minocin over the counter viagra online bulgaria indomethacin 50mg cap cheap generic cialis xenical uk cheapest order bactrim overnight inderal 40 mg propranolol buy viagra cheap buy colchicine next day diflucan 100 mg capsule cipro bayer 500 mg precio lipitor 20 mg mexico phenergan order order proscar online uk clomid 50mg metformin cephalexin pills sweat prednisone 10mg pregnancy cheap viagra usa isoniazid medication where to buy antivert 25mg tablets side effects triplets clomid 50mg actoplus metformin generic buy minocycline singapore canada buy proscar without prescription suprax cost without insurance cymbalta prices costco get levlen toronto fluoxetine prescription only vasotec from usa pharmacy acai berry purchase online dosage augmentin 500mg buy nexium argentina increasing libido in men supplements minocin legal us indian pharmacy mycelex-g nexium tablets spc nolvadex buy pct synthroid side effects joint pain levitra 10mg tablets levitra generic canada 1mg or 5mg finasteride for hairloss? generic diflucan 150 mg acquisto diamox sicuro online viagra prescription only approved pharmacy periactin tablets 4mg que precio tiene las pastillas redustat cialis 20 mg originale viagra 5mg buy western drug plendil lipitor atorvastatin muscle spasms synthroid generic medication generic viagra cumming buy cheap canadian drugs gulf of mexico alliance all hands where to buy acai berry fruit orlistat 20mg tab femara 10 mg cost coversyl pct buy dapoxetine generic antabuse implant nhs exelon stock buy or sell glucophage 850 mg dosage glyset side effects uk current price kamagra elimite for men sale in uk actos medicine coupons premarin shop order lipitor from canada asian generic viagra lipitor $4 copay participating pharmacies walgreens cialis 5 or 10 mg letrozole nolvadex buy lexapro generic dosages can we trust baclofen online buy liquid viagra mentat comanda online cheap glucophage can you order atarax canadian pharmacy finasteride propecia generic nolvadex non perscription countries viagra generico nome lexapro dosage 5mg cheapest place to buy pariet what is risperdal medication used for generic levitra fda prednisone 5 mg canada buy prednisolone online canada generic lexapro 2012 march snovitra super power medicine online no prescription uk antibiotics list buy lisinopril 20 mg information funciona cialis generico buy promethazine 15mg online narrow and broad spectrum antibiotics purchase protonix cheap 100 mg levitra pharmacy starting buy accutane online what is januvia for suprax antibiotic reviews where can i get clomid pills prednisone 30 mg 5 days naprosyn sr 1000 use web pharmacy uk prezzo lasix 25 mg 80 mg prednisone lot ebay cialis generico online viagra rezept bali buy viagra 10mg lexapro costco hoodia dosage instructions canadian zestoretic tablet glifor 850 mg metformin lexapro generic pap ram nexium 40 mg cheap hydrochlorothiazide sale uk valtrex 500 mg 42 tablet cheap us aceon online overnight avapro western australia buy zofran online canada buy kamagra 100mg cialis tadafil 50mg pan american lithium corporation viagra cheap country nolvadex research buy generic prograf usa pharmacy generic zoloft medication buy dapoxetine 60mg abilify cost with insurance augmentin 1000 mg fiyat 14 cialis 20mg 30er propecia 1 mg 28 comprimidos viagra online cheapest retin-a ge weight gain diflucan capsules 150mg nexium esomeprazole 20 mg much does generic aricept cost viagra online meds taking 2 viagra pills xenical 120mg india viagra 100mg substitute original purinethol online donde comprar finasteride en peru levitra en generico avodart usage viagra 100mg generic uk drugs classification table 5 m mg cialis buy viagra 50mg diclofenac online bestellen zonder recept zovirax tabletas 1000 mg levitra 20 mg bijsluiter propranolol 40 mg bijsluiter periactin online bestellen amitriptyline sold over counter buy nolvadex genox prednisone 10mg buy how long does it take for lexapro to leave your system fungsi cialis 20mg phenergan generic promethazine tomar viagra 100mg robaxin cheap uk pharmacy generic viagra super active uk paypal online viagra rating diflucan pill 100mg hydrea mg buy buyers cialis mexican pharmacy no prescription actonel levitra bayer buy generic celebrex reviews buy benemid online overnight online viagra ireland buying viagra amsterdam generic bactrim ointment 5mg lexapro effectiveness ordering brand levitra bayer cheap buspar medication order generic viagra less cialis cheap canadqa buy lasuna cheap nonprecription generic cialis cheap prednisone 10mg diflucan 50 mg prospecto generic metformin 500 mg really cheap viagra how to get viagra over the counter buying zithromax 1 gram kamagra 100 mg price med-rx protein powder kegunaan nexium 40 mg pharmacy phd admission 2011 europe viagra buyer usa viagra rx online furosemide tablets 40mg used where to purchase isoptin zyrtec canada head office coumadin tablets dosage pet allies show low az directions round 10mg levitra canadian online pharmacy for chloroquine switching propecia generic 50 mg viagra generic amoxil 500mg paypal generic lasix pills baclofen drug store online aldactone noprescrition needed uk online pharmacy generic lexapro medicine diflucan online cheap cheapest viagra 100 mg doxycycline for cheap buy plavix online usa buy tetracycline 500 mg 100mg doxycycline dosage geriforte prescription only clomid 100mg chances cialis 5 mg enough zithromax online order ralista supplier in uk zoloft 50 mg erowid order propecia bosley buy strattera uses no prescription diabetes cheap actos lisinopril 2 5 mg pilex tablets for purchase buy ginseng with paypal viagra order ireland generic wellbutrin safe order abilify online no prescription with a mastercard generic phenergan medication buy zantac online amazon kamagra buy online purchase desyrel cheap viagras cena where to ashwagandha buy generic diflucan keflex dosage for cystitis buy skelaxin online reviews generic lexapro medication zyvox online pharmacy uk desi tashan veera nexium 10 mg granulat viagra cheap india overnight shipping buy generic clomid online strattera sublinguals buy buy prednisone asthma zithromax generic name prescriptions cheap vermox order bystolic 20 mg metformin tablet 500mg price increase prilosec buying viagra lanzarote 28x 5mg cialis vitamin d deficiency causes erectile dysfunction med cab levaquin cheap price nexium buy levitra 1.84 metformin 500mg pcos levitra 20 mg. tabletas atrovent nebulizer dosage pediatric cialis prescribtion online buy metformin nz cipro woldwide shipping suppliers of lipothin in us viagra 800 mg how to buy fml forte in london brand mycelex-g buy buy cialis vancouver indinavir paypal zoloft buying can you buy things on itunes with paypal cialis super active non perscription countries roxithromycin online shipping fertomid refills endep medication reviews allies web canadian forces links buy nizagara from india orlistat uk supply billig isoniazid online kaufen current lithium price chart generic strattera 25 mg albendazole rxlist tijuana pharmacy hours flovent drug class zovirax online order levitra order usa strattera going generic buy viagra houston purchase bentyl canada is zyban sold over the counter buy cheap atorlip 10 where to purchase cardizem generic rosuvastatin in canada generico de lexapro viagra online free kamagra jel cheap cialis onlinesouy cialis becoming generic buy doxycycline suspension wellbutrin generic online indian generics online sominex what is atrovent nasal spray big blue pill hzt nizoral shampoo australia price generic viagra ingrediants cialis 100mg pills 60 mg strattera overdose generico viagra curitiba cialis 80 mgr compare prices imitrex generic for amoxil erfahrungsbericht levitra 10mg is plavix generic available viagra super 100mg zovirax 800 mg precio bula propranolol 10mg cialis online 5mil buy zaditor next day buy viagra wien cheap quick viagra take cialis 40 mg xenical generic cost coupon discount cymbalta finast 40 mg pharmacy nolvadex 20 mg kaufen precio generico zovirax recommended dosage for prometrium cheap geninue viagra diflucan 200 mg prospect buspar 5 mg tablets buy medrol tablets lasix online fedex how much will crestor cost generic strattera 80 mg buying generic cialis buy clomid cheap cialis generic dosage lexapro buy line nolvadex shop online generic lexapro walmart motrin 100 what illnesses does biaxin treat celebrex 200 mg canada shuddha guggulu online cheap admiral insurance company viagra online manly glucophage xr generico tofranil 10 mg cost abilify tablets oral solution innopran xl tablets side effects buy caverta mg buy ditropan pills online generic lexapro available lidocaine spray otc gabapentin 100mg neurontin an anticonvulsant viagra generic 150 mg order viagra reviews doxycycline hydrochloride 100 mg keppra price in canada cialis shop online low price indinavir uk cheapest cialis 20mg uk cozaar on the internet buy casodex perth australia propranolol 40 mg grossesse buy silagra hong kong 40mg cheap cialis atacand mg price viagra vs generic cheap brahmi powder generic viagra 26 cialis buy actos 60 mg cialis online vendita generic proventil paypal dosierung xenical 120 mg
Home

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 646 guests online

Atom RSS

Interview - Andrew Zimbalist - Sports Economist PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
The Biz of Baseball - Interviews
Written by Maury Brown   
Sunday, 08 August 2004 12:00

Andrew ZimbalistWhen the discussion of the economics of baseball are discussed in the media and beyond, most often you'll find Andrew Zimbalist in the mix.

This interview covers the debate over the public subsidy of stadium development, to territorial rights, especially as it pertains to the Baltimore/Washington, D.C. area, to the current revenue sharing system, plus more, Zimbalist covers all the bases.


The numbers are staggering.

Since 1992, when Bud Selig took over as Commissioner of Baseball, there have been 15 new or renovated ballparks. In the case of the new ballparks, all have had some form of public subsidy involved, totaling well in excess of a billion dollars when all is said and done and leases are fulfilled. This new stadium development is touted by MLB as being a panacea towards overall franchise success, regardless of the fact that many see franchise sustainability being coupled, in large part, to wins and losses as well.

With this large volume of stadia development has been the constant struggle to try to quantify the economic impacts of ballpark development within local, state and regional domains, and one of the most visible economists to speak to this current environment has been Andrew Zimbalist.

Zimbalist serves as Robert A. Woods Professor of Economics at Smith College and his resume is  peppered with consultation as it pertains to baseball. To Wendell, Chritton & Parks in the Florida State League/Florida Marlins arbitration case, to the Major League Baseball Players' Association in collective bargaining, to ABRY Communications in a baseball broadcasting suit, to the United Baseball League, to Krendl, Horowitz and Krendl in Ehrhardt v. Colorado Rockies, to the Portland Oregon Mayor's Commission on bringing another professional sports team to the city, the list is far too long to mention in this space.

To add to this, Andrew has several outstanding books on the economics of baseball. "Baseball and Billions: A Probing Look Inside the Big Business of Our National Pastime", and "May the Best Team Win: Baseball Economics and Public Policy" can be found on the desks of those ranging from politicians, to fellow economists, to baseball researchers.

The following interview covers several areas, from the economics of new stadium development, to the shifting of discretionary income as it pertains to this development, to the territorial claims by Orioles owner Peter Angelos regarding the possible relocation of the Montreal Expos to Washington, D.C., and possible ramifications to further relocation or expansion, to the overall health of small to mid-tiered markets under the current revenue sharing plan. Enjoy! - Maury Brown


BizBall: You’ve been following the economics of baseball for some time now. What has been the biggest fundamental change in how MLB conducts business over the last 10-20 years?

Zimbalist:
I would think that the biggest change has been the introduction of its revenue sharing system in 1996 and the extension of that system in 2002. Prior to that system the only thing that got shared in baseball was gate revenue. And in the American League they shared about 20% of gate revenue, and the National League about 5% of gate revenue. There was a program that they introduced in the 80’s to do some sharing in the American League of pay cable back then, but basically it amounted to just about nothing. So fundamentally out of all the revenue that got generated they only had either the 20% [shared] in the American League and roughly 5% in the National League; nothing else was shared.

And then when local television contracts really began to take off -- the Yankee contract that was signed with MSG back in 1988 was a 12 year contract worth $493 million over the period -- you had the emergence of TBS with the Braves and WGN with the Cubs, and the Mets had a big contract, the Red Sox got a big contract, baseball’s revenues became very sharply imbalanced.

And, the other thing that’s happening of course in the early 90’s is the introduction of the new stadiums, beginning with Camden Yards, or some people might want to date it to a year earlier in 1991 with the new White Sox stadium. But the retro-set architecture stadiums begins with ‘92 Camden Yards. Those stadiums for many teams ended up generating an extra $30 million a year for the team, so that together with the local television contracts and no revenue sharing meant that the revenue disparities between top and the bottom teams, which were actually no greater than $30 million back in 1989, all of the sudden exploded, so that by the end of the 90’s those disparities are up over $200 million. Or around $200 million, let’s say.

And in this context baseball introduced the revenue sharing system. I think it’s a really major change. It required a shift in political alignments, to get the big city teams to go along with that, to get Steinbrenner to go along with that, O’Malley at the time still owned the Dodgers, to get him to go along with it in ’96, to get the Chicago teams to go along with it, the Tribune Corporation, was a major political accomplishment. And they began sharing revenues, so I think that’s the big number, and of course as I’ve said elsewhere the system doesn’t work as well as it ought to because the incentives that are built into it are perverse, they’re backwards, they actually assess a higher marginal tax rate on low revenue teams than on high revenue teams. It therefore in my view has not done what it is supposed to do, which is to equalize payrolls.

BizBall: A common claim among economists is that spending on sports simply shifts spending from other entertainment options (movies, etc.). This theory assumes that most individuals have a finite amount of discretionary income to spend on entertainment. Some might argue that a high percentage of Americans have enough discretionary income to choose to attend most of the entertainment events that they would like to attend. If season ticket holders of an MLB team suddenly lost their franchise, would it follow that each season ticket holder would add 81 nights of other entertainment activities annually to their life?

Zimbalist: [laughter] Well, first of all, I don’t think that season ticket holders go to all 81 games. Most of them don’t, anyway; I think they end up sharing their ticket, or giving away their ticket to some other people, at least for some of the games. But no, I don’t think it follows that way, and look, I don’t think the proper argument is that there is a 1-to-1 trade off here. The argument is simply that for most people who go to ballgames they have a finite amount of discretionary income and there is a substitution effect working, but again, it’s not a 1-to-1 effect, maybe it effects 80% or 90% of the money that would otherwise get spent at the ballpark.
And it certainly is not the only basis for the argument that there is no positive economic impulse or developmental impulse from having a new stadium or a new team in your town.

One of the reasons is the substitution effect, but another very important reason is the leakage effect. Which is to say that if money gets spent at a ballpark, something like 60% of it on average goes to players, who have an average income of $2.4 million, and when money goes to those players, and most players don’t live in the town where their team is anyway, then the money leaks out, because a millionaire has a very high savings rate, much higher savings rate than somebody with ordinary income, thirty or forty thousand dollars, and that money they save goes into the world money markets, it doesn’t get spent at the local cities, and even more that’s true because the player doesn’t live in the city, so his permanent home is elsewhere, or if he has family elsewhere, a lot of the money gets sent back to the family.

And, also players are encouraged, and most of them follow the encouragement or the advice, they’re encouraged to save a lot because their life in baseball and their lifetime earning the mega-salaries is a very short one.

It’s not like what happens to me, an economics professor. I got into the business of being an economics professor when I was 25 years old and I could do that for decades, but for professional baseball players if you’re lucky you play 5 to 10 years and you don’t earn the mega-salaries your whole life. So, they’re encouraged to save a lot of money, and again the pattern is for the money to go into the world money markets and not to be spent in the local cities. So, there are leakages. And, of course, a lot of money goes to the owners and the owners have a similar pattern to the players, and those leakages are much higher than if the entertainment dollar gets spent at the bowling alley or restaurants, where the money ultimately goes to entrepreneurs who have a much more normal income, and who live in the local towns. So, very high leakages are another factor here. And, another factor still is that ballparks these days get financed with hundreds of millions of dollars of local tax money and if taxes go up then it means that that money is not being spent by consumers in other areas of the local economy. Either that or the city might rig -- I guess I’m not sure about this --either the services, and either higher taxes or lower services doesn’t help the local economy. So, if you put all of those effects together, the empirical research suggests that the expectation should not be that you get an increase in employment or an increase in per capita income.

BizBall: What about in cases where there are personal income taxes in some states? Wouldn’t there be money collected from the players and management in that framework?

Zimbalist: Yeah, there would be, but again the evidence is that the amount of expenditure that goes out of the public coffers in order to finance the debt service that they have to incur to build the stadium, or to improve the infrastructure, or both of those things, the amount of outflow is greater than the amount of inflow.

BizBall: Along the same lines, in the case of several cities, and possibly some new locations should relocation or expansion be considered, there are cities that border other states. Is there a case to be made that monies from bordering states cross over into these locales and therefore help the economies of these host cities via tourism?

Zimbalist: Yeah, sure, and in fact I made that case in part with the New York Nets leaving New Jersey and going into New York, in this case Brooklyn. So it can happen.

There are possibilities for, in essence, cannibalizing revenue across state lines.

And if what you’re interested in is the fiscal situation of a government on one side of the state line as opposed to the other side of the state line, yeah, there can be a shift in that way. It doesn’t end up producing a tremendous amount of difference, but there can be a small gain as a result of that.

It’s a different argument than an argument for regional development, though, because in terms of the overall metropolitan area the money is still in that area. But it might very well cross a political boundary and help one side of the boundary to the detriment to the other side.

BizBall: How much of the financial forecasting that MLB presents to the press and government do you feel is done to leverage the public in terms of stadium development and for collective bargaining purposes?


Zimbalist: Some of it. I tend to believe that those are not the main motivations today. Of course historically the other factor has been to hold on to the anti-trust exemption, or the  presumed anti-trust exemption, when they testify to Congress. But more recently I think the strongest motivation that teams have to color their financial picture is to avoid revenue sharing. That is to say, if you can push your revenue off your baseball books onto your media books or onto your stadium books, or some other, as in the case of the Chicago Cubs onto their premium ticket company, then you can avoid some of baseball’s revenue sharing taxes. So I think there are a variety of motivations to do that, but it’s hard to believe in this day and age that Don Fehr or Gene Orza or Mike Weiner are very misled by claims of penury that either Selig issues for all baseball or individual teams issue. Because they’ve been down that road and they know the game pretty well.


BizBall: On that note about dispersal of revenues, the Yankees and Red Sox have been talking about doing a merger of TV packages. Do you think this continues to blur the line for revenue sharing purposes?

Zimbalist: Well, first of all, that story is simply the product of our idiotic media. There’s no truth to that story.

BizBall: Could you elaborate?

Zimbalist: I mean, look, what happens in a situation like that is that there are two people who are having a conversation over a drink who are connected to either the Yankees or the Red Sox, and there’s a third person there, and this person happens to hear one of them who sort of throws out this idea that they might bat around for thirty seconds or something. So that third person then calls up his friend who’s a journalist and the journalist wants to break the story so he goes out and writes the story. But I don’t think there’s any factual basis to the story. I’ve spoken to owners on both sides and they disclaim any such notions and even if you just look at it logically it’s absurd.

Number one, baseball has television territories that it would violate, and they’d have to get MLB’s permission. Number two, they’d be inviting anti-trust scrutiny from the Justice Department if they tried to combine forces and get more leverage in the cable television market. Number three, any synergies they might get that would increase their revenues would then have to be shared between the two teams. Number four, the Yankees and the Red Sox play at similar times during the day, or at the same time during the day, very often, and they have competing claims on the time.

There’s just an infinite number of complications. And number five, and perhaps most importantly, the Yankees and the Red Sox have gone out of their way to develop a classic baseball rivalry, and if they start jumping into television bed together it totally undermines the perception of that rivalry. And quite apart from personality differences that might make it a complicated thing to do, I don’t think it ever made any sense, and it’s just one journalist trying to get a jump on a story based on a silly rumor.

BizBall: Peter Angelos has made quite a lot of noise about fan attendance and cable share being diluted for the Orioles should the Montreal Expos relocate to DC or Northern VA. Do you subscribe to those arguments?

Zimbalist: Well, I think he’s correct that there would be some dilution in his television ratings and some dilution in his attendance. Whether the reductions would be 5%, 10%, or 15% in each case, I don’t know. I don’t think it would be more than 15%. But basically I would say to him, “Tough noogies.” You’ve got two substantial media markets there and  you can host two teams in those markets. I mean, you might as well have Jerry Reinsdorf come along and say, “Hey, the Cubs dilute my revenues.” And that would be true, too. So Reinsdorf might as well go to Major League Baseball and petition Bud Selig, and say, “Hey, Bud, you’re my friend. I’ve supported you. The Tribune Company really isn’t your friend. Why don’t we just eliminate the Chicago Cubs?” And to me, logically, there’s not too much difference in those two arguments. Politically it might be a little different, of course, because it’s harder to eliminate a team that’s been around for time immemorial than it is to create a new team into a market.

But, D.C. used to have a team. In fact, they used to have two different teams, and I think it’s a premier market and they ought to have a team. And whether or not Angelos ends up effecting Selig in the ultimate decision by baseball, I don’t know, but certainly I don’t think that he should.

BizBall: Buried deep within the wording of a bill before congress is verbiage that would allow sports franchises the same ability of other business to write off 100% percent of their intangible assets, such as TV revenues, on an evenly divided basis over 15 years, as opposed to the current system which only allows for half of the assets. Beyond the huge windfall for sports owners for long-term investment, is this simply a case of having all businesses treated equally?

Zimbalist: No, it’s not.

First of all, you can’t amortize goodwill; that rule has changed, so businesses don’t get to amortize or depreciate all of their assets. Secondly, look, they might go for public relations purposes and say that this is to treat sports franchises the same as other businesses but the fact of the matter is that sports franchises, which might be valued depending on the league and the team anywhere from $100 million to $1 billion, don’t have many hard assets to establish that value. The main thing that a sports franchise has is a berth in a monopoly sports league which you could call goodwill, you could call it a going concern, and if you want you can somewhat falsely attribute it to television or other media contracts.

The IRS has always historically said that television contracts are non-depreciating assets or non-amortizing assets. They are always renewed. In other words, if I buy a car, it depreciates each year, it gets a little less valuable each year, that’s a physical deterioration that happens. But if I buy a baseball team and the baseball team buys a local television contract, if you go back and look at the historical records, when that contract is over there’s always a new one! And historically it’s always been a larger one. But whether it’s larger or not, the value is pretty much ongoing. Now in some cases something might happen that’s unanticipated, and then you might have an impairment of the asset, and they ought to be able to account for an impairment of assets, but generally speaking, baseball teams and other sports teams, almost all of their value is intangible.

In contrast, if you look at a manufacturing company, most of their value is tangible. They’ve got machinery, they’ve got technology, they’ve got patents, and so on. And therefore if you allow them to amortize some of their intangible assets, it’s going to be a minority of their  overall asset value. But if you allow a sports team to amortize the intangibles, you’re basically allowing them to amortize the whole thing. So it’s different for sports than for other businesses.

And to me the more fundamental question is, what is the theoretical basis for saying there’s any depreciation at all in the tangible assets? And I don’t think there is one. And so I see it as an improper give away, and I see it as once again as kind of absurd politicking wherein you have special interests who get politicians whom they donate money to to stick it onto a bill that has nothing to do with the operation of sports franchises.

BizBall: From an economic perspective, is MLB going to be able to have sustainable and healthy franchises in existing smaller markets, and how does this impact possible relocation of franchises and/or expansion?

Zimbalist: Well, it all depends on the economic system that baseball has. If baseball has a sound revenue sharing system they can put teams in smaller markets. But it also depends in part on what you mean by smaller market. Is Portland, Oregon a smaller market because it has fewer than three million people? Well, I don’t think so. It seems to me that Portland, Oregon is perfectly capable of hosting a sports team in a league that’s properly designed. And Portland is a town that has been experiencing very good population growth and looking down the road they ought to be able to have a baseball team. As should some other cities. I guess you could argue that Nintendo should make the same argument that Angelos does: “My goodness, if you put a team in Portland there’ll be some dilution in our fanbase!” And that’s true. They’ll be some. But whether it’s 2%, 4%, or 5%, or 6%, who knows? But also, who cares? Because the people of Portland deserve a baseball team just as much as the people of Seattle do.

BizBall: I think they’re hand-wringing over this situation because it really does open up and set precedent if they pay off Angelos when he doesn’t have territorial rights to D.C. And it opens up a can of worms, like you’re saying with Howard Lincoln and Nintendo, Seattle and Portland, even though it’s 175 miles away they deem this a territorial market from a regional cable perspective and radio broadcast perspective.

Zimbalist: Look, I’ll tell you what, you have two territories for a baseball team. One is the physical territory; it used to be determined by 75 miles, now it’s defined in terms of counties.

And then you have another market--that’s the television market--that is much broader. And in fact the television markets span territories so that they bump up against each other. And therefore, they cover the whole country.

And so there’s no reason why Major League Baseball would not allocate like the whole state of Arkansas to a team, like the Houston Astros, for instance. They wouldn’t say, “Oh well, you know, it’s more than X number of miles from your ballpark and therefore you can’t have it.” No, they’re not going to leave the potential fans in Arkansas without access on local cable to watching a team.

So what they do is allocate: television markets are allocated to everybody in the United States. Therefore, whenever you contemplate adding a team you’d be interfering with somebody’s television market. And if you held that argument as decisive that, “Oh, you’re taking away part of this guy’s television market,” then you’d never be able to have expansion. Not now and not in forty years. Even when the U.S. population might be 350 million instead of 290 million. So that argument can’t possibly be a conclusive argument in my view.

BizBall: How much of the current growth in MLB is attributed to the recent honeymoon effect of new stadium development and do you see a trend in which there will be repercussions when these honeymoon periods fade?

Zimbalist: The honeymoon effect is very short-lived unless the owner is smart enough to take advantage of it.

A new stadium gives the owner an opportunity to get more revenue out of his players, and if his players generate more revenue they should be paid more. And so the smart owner says, I’m going to take advantage of my new stadium by increasing my payroll and putting a better team on the field, and getting my fans really excited. If the owner does that you can get a honeymoon effect that lasts five, six, seven, eight years.

If the owner doesn’t do that, then there’s a curiosity effect that can last two or three months, after which the fans get ticked off that the owner isn’t doing anything to improve the team. So honeymoon effects are very differential. It depends on the strengths and acumen of ownership.

That said, yes, of course, baseball has had a building renaissance, since 1991, and that renaissance has, although some teams more than others, that renaissance has generally raised attendance appreciably. And as the newness of some of these stadiums fades into the past, they won’t have that factor to boost attendance anymore. So other things being equal, yeah, that would make attendance drop a little bit.

BizBall: In your book, May the Best Team Win, you talk about how the Yankees have incentives to increase their stadium expenses, new stadia development, and a number of other areas. The last Chapter is entitled, “What is to be done?” Can you touch on this facet of the book, and tell us if any of the points within that chapter have changed since publication?

Zimbalist: You mean things that I would recommend?

BizBall: Yes.

Zimbalist: Well, I wrote that book at a time when baseball was talking about contracting by two or four teams. And I believe that as long as baseball maintains that posture, especially after a period where its revenues have been growing by 15-16% per year, that the U.S. Congress ought to go after baseball and say, “We’ve had enough. Your demand is increasing by 15% a year. If you want to reduce your output, we’re going to force you guys to have competition so that we can have an appropriate level of output.” Meaning more baseball teams rather than less baseball teams when demand is growing at 15% a year.

That’s what I believe.

And I believe in general that it would better serve U.S. fans, U.S. consumers, to have more competition in the baseball industry. But I don’t believe, at this point in time, that it’s in the cards, because baseball isn’t talking about contraction anymore, and therefore it makes more sense when talking about policy to focus on more realistic policy options.

And for me the most important thing for baseball to do is to get their revenue sharing system right. Because this year they’re going to be sharing about $280 million, top teams to the bottom teams, and it’s not going to do anything, in my view, to improve competitive balance. Because the bottom teams face this higher tax rate than the top teams. And payroll disparity has actually grown since 2002 when this new revenue sharing system was introduced.

So, I think they need to get their incentives right.

Right now the way the incentive system works in the revenue sharing system is that successful teams get penalized, and poorly performing teams are rewarded. Failure is rewarded and success is penalized. And I think you need to have a revenue sharing system that does the opposite, where teams are motivated to improve themselves. And so that would be the first thing that I would change.

Second thing that I would change, although I recognize that Bud Selig has done some good things, I don’t think baseball’s commissioner should be an owner. And I think that Selig’s  botched a lot of stuff. And so I think they need to replace Selig. I don’t think that they will, but I think they need to replace Selig, get some independent, intelligent, outside businessperson who knows a great deal about baseball, and leads the sport in a way that doesn’t suggest that there’s any conflict of interest, or that there’s any inability on the part of the commissioner to act in the best interests of baseball rather than the best interests of a coterie of owners.

BizBall: I understand that you have another book slated to be published. Can you tell us about it?

Zimbalist: Very briefly, I’m writing a book with Stefan Szymanski, who’s a British sports economist. What we’re doing is looking at the evolution of basically soccer leagues and the evolution of baseball and other closed leagues in the United States. Soccer Leagues in Europe and throughout the rest of the world are organized on an open basis and systems of promotion and relegation, where the top teams in the league get promoted to a higher level league, and the bottom teams in the league get demoted or relegated to a lower level league.

That system creates a very different pattern of incentives and fan responses than the closed system that we have in the United States, closed meaning that the existing owners determine if there will be expansion, and if there is expansion, who gets to own a team. And that creates a system of leverage and monopoly that gives teams an ability to extort large public subsidies and deprives fans in many cities of getting to have a professional team, when they warrant one, given the economic size of the city.

So, these are very, very different ways of organizing sports leagues, and they generate very different kinds of tensions and problems, and have different kinds of successes.

So what we're trying to do in the book is to explain how the systems are different, explain why they evolved the way that they did, looking at economic and political and cultural factors.

And then, finally, trying to figure out where the systems are heading, and whether the two systems can learn anything from each other.

The following interview was originally published on the SABR Business of Baseball website, and can be read here: SABR Business of Baseball Interviews Page

Interview conducted by Maury Brown on 8/9/04. Edited by Jeff Sackmann.

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?