best place to order seroquel in us order ditropan overnight order nizagara uk pharmacy cheap protonix pantoprazole buy amaryl have no prescription buy suhagra cheap drugstore order atacand online olanzapine overdose treatment buy lopressor tablets canada acai free shipping co-operative pharmacy store locator pulmicort inhaler india tretinoin cream usp .1 do you need a presciption to buy cialis tulasi without a prescription metoprolol side effect chest pain requip mg buy what drugs are over the counter in mexico pilex drug schedule radio 1 listen live cafe puerto rico restaurant puerto rico buy zofran patch leukeran australia pharmacy order strattera 100 mg buy diabecon visa penegra online india clopidogrel bisulfate 75 mg po tabs cafergot formulation comprar cytotec online en espan~a retin a cream uk prices doxycycline tablets acne current ginseng prices in ky is it safe to order avandamet overnight pharmacy suhagra xenical in india price isoniazid online no prescription clomid online shipping requip not generic is it illegal to order generic cytoxan anti nausea medicine zofran best foundation for dry aging skin 2013 starlix generic reviews lasix 40 mg medicine weight loss after stopping depo provera shelf life of detrol l.a florida calan is it illegal to order generic calan topical erythromycin acne treatment lexapro 10mg for anxiety what does generic motrin look like albendazole order hindgra sildenafil tablets exelon careers login buy tramadol online cod only prescription solutions costa mesa what does aricept 10 mg look like comparatif prix cialis pharmacie colospa cost in canada buy elavil with no script alesse pharmacy cod shipping zyvox 800 mg price free usa viagra dapoxetine rx requip supplies newark buy bupropion fast shipping lantus online no prescription terbinafine alcohol safe etodolac buy genuine rogaine 5 best price separation anxiety pills for dogs the drugstore gallery somerset aygestin dose administration minocin drug schedule buy ephedraxin next day to buy cyklokapron prescription drug amitriptyline online cheapest zyvox in the uk generic urispas ordering mirapex best blood pressure medications with least side effects tretinoin 0,025 roche precio argentina vpxl cost comparison lisinopril medicine quickest cardura can you take 2 diflucan pills citalopram purchase online how effective is erythromycin tablets for acne diclofenac sodium 75mg sr tablets how to by trimox online lov cost atacand alesse cost in canada serevent over the counter augmentin 375 mg tablets risperdal drugs schizophrenia buy kamagra gold without rx brand name fml forte online chemical research nolvadex nimotop generico italiano zofran cheap price where unisom malegra dxt shortage how much is reminyl tablets benadryl next day grogginess buy zithromax online in usa i pill zyloprim website order levaquin pills cheap kamagra buy online prazosin purchase in canada no prescription levitra online pharmacy no prescription guaranteed cheap abilify india abana prices at costco mebendazole cost at wal mart is periactin an over the counter drug ceftin 250 mg generic what is coumadin made of much does cost canada buy effexor xr costco pharmacy viagra super active price how much does generic viagra cost in canada tablet pharmacy meds alesse prescriptions maxalt generic cost detrol online fastest flomax uk delivery buy vermox with mebendazole order how to import sinemet zetia dose range cheapest liposafe best heavy coverage drugstore foundation buy viagra sublingual in singapore indian pharmacy carafate buy premarin 40 cost of clozaril cheap uk paypal viagra online purchase provera 2.5 mg doxycycline hyclate 50 mg uses how much will levaquin cost side effects of too much synthroid medication exelon medication dosage donepezil hydrochloride uses zithromax iv dose children noroxin antibiotic uses buy online maxalt generic buy trimox amoxil online american express merchant login australia sarah's accutane journal medication acyclovir zovirax keflex 500 precio mexico buy finast pills buy generic eldepryl with bonus biaxin how to buy hydrochlorothiazide complications switching from depo provera to pills where to buy tadacip without a prescription what does clonidine make you feel like accutane price australia buy cabgolin online overnight chloroquine prices usa how to get capoten in australia current price atacand ventolin drug schedule lotrisone generic cheap costs purchase generic rumalaya liniment phone in order for trental ortho tri cyclen lo reviews breast size nolvadex buy online uk wellbutrin sr online legally como comprar female viagra generic cialis super active usa pharmacy indian pharmacy singulair blue circle pill abg 100 pill identifier with pictures watson 387 midamor order on web styplon costco apcalis sx woldwide shipping can you take trileptal daily generic lasuna no prescription isoniazid dosage quinine tablets for sale can you buy viagra over the counter in canada arimidex for purchase how to use diovan muscle relaxer skelaxin dosage side effects of mentax urb. la florida aravaca get viagra soft las vegas buy lanoxin discount sertraline side effects 100mg sarafem ordering online pharmacy hytrin without insurance what is plendil 5 mg buy levitra 40 bactroban with no perscription what is keftab used for chinese herbal medicine lower back pain where can i get acai max cleanse in stores order amitriptyline without prescription cardura xl prescribing information kamagra soft coupons inderal 10 price singulair over counter uk buy motilium with visa diflucan class action lawsuit mobic price @ walmart buy trental online amazon zoloft insomnia how long neurontin 800 mg 50 c,entikli film tablet buy now viagra cialis liv 52 coupons para que se usa skelaxin where can i order pariet is leukeran a prescription drug cystone medication can i buy viagra in italy ultra low dose emsam allegra allergy fexofenadine hcl tablets 180 mg cardizem 100mg buy order generic paroxetine cheap kamagra gold usa cialis sublingual roche precio argentina is it illegal to order generic colchicine buy over the counter relafen online xerograx pastillas phenergan children dose how to order hyaluronic acid online cheap lopid india shelf life of prednisone buy carbozyne perth australia buy micardis online canada no prescription indikasi chloramphenicol 250 mg minocin buy online ireland order cozaar buy arimidex inhaler canada viagra discount coupons online how to use lithium polymer batteries mestinon for sale australia atarax no prescription needed canadian online pharmacy how to get off prednisone buy dvd recorder online australia estrace discount voucher vytorin next day shipping allopurinol wanted online review compare prices aricept buy deltasone paypal pharmacy has best price hydrea paypal payment tetracyline purchase cheap prescription dapoxetine online purchasing metoclopramide online uk discount canadian pharmacy alli metoclopramide generic reglan saw palmetto pills for prostate generic mentat ds syrup uk paypal plan would delay sales of generic for lipitor crestor dosage too high what is robaxin 500 used for decadron prescription dosage blood pressure medication and dementia buy keftab 200 canadian alliance information generic alternative for diovan hct coreg annual sales generic get cefixime las vegas florida mentat ds syrup dutas australia price flagyl over the counter canada eldepryl to buy in australia generic flomax online avapro tablets high blood pressure canada drugs femara with prescription levitra plus medicine cheap buy actoplus met pharmacy minoxidil better than finasteride chloramphenicol uk brand name dramamine generic cheap costs purchase accutane cod cash delivery eldepryl coupons genuine topamax best price is florinef over the counter side effects of prednisone 40 mg buy plendil capsules buy elavil 20 levlen online sales what is wellbutrin used for and its side effects prednisolone stopping your medicine what is betnovate pills used for buy depo medrol no prescription what is naprosyn taken for low dose bupropion how to take diamox for altitude sickness cheap aspirin singapore albuterol inhaler during pregnancy generic for sinemet 25-100 acheter medrol 16 mg side effects of zoloft medication what does wellbutrin sr treat cheap zaditor over the counter brafix cardura online what is co-azithromycin used to treat over the counter remeron indocin indications usage does metformin interfere with birth control pills over the counter fluconazole tablets viagra sublingual 50mg tablets purchase hydrochlorothiazide medication what is the role of parietal cells in gerd metformin and clomid 100mg success stories buy cafergot no prescription online discount buy dutas from india generic effexor reviews cheap brand advair diskus usa fluoxetine on line in the usa revia 100mg tablet vermox 100mg tabletki how to buy actavis promethazine codeine buy cheap retino a cream 0,05 mometasone nasal spray india is tretinoin better than differin over counter ginette-35 purchasing citalopram online uk keppra prices at costco taking clomid ovulation test viramune where can i buy it generic fenofibrate 160 mg cheap nolvadex india how to by forzest online buy water pills over counter buy bupron sr 15mg online ponstel order canada pfizer viagra ireland best place buy actoplus met pct viagra 100mg pfizer what does amantadine target how to get retin a prescription uk zerit medication power slim acai reviews over counter cozaar can you buy viagra super active in ireland online pill store echeck what happens if a healthy male takes viagra buy danazol perth australia over the counter drugs similar to lotensin nootropil dog dose generic singulair medication cialis 100 mg 30 film kapl? tabletler furosemide infusion in heart failure cialis soft for sale uk lotrisone overnight pharmacy mail order allegra d online synthroid no prescription australian pharmacies online florinef online cheap protonix purchase in canada no prescription zoloft now co uk zofran class action lawsuit crestor 5mg prec,o sinemet canada prescription tadalafil citrate 20 mg cialis® generikum asda pharmacy ventolin amaryl diabetes drug dosage buy femara perth australia buy sumycin tetracycline online buy colchicine gout zoloft drug class blue pfizer vgr 100 lisinopril uk no prescription indian pharmacy sinequan post cycle therapy ginseng paxil for sale uk generic zoloft prices buy parlodel online overnight what is tadapox made of walgreens canada road single dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy can you generic buy tenormin online prednisolone prix en pharmacie en france exelon drugstore com strattera in india diflucan lawsuit center what is protonix medicine best place to buy retin-a 0,025 best rx pharmacy online suppliers of malegra fxt in us allegra d generic otc buying forzest from canada no prescription where can i get cialis in toronto doxycycline for acne side effects bipolar medication abilify side effects albuterol inhaler safe during pregnancy valtrex mg usa low amitriptyline pain doses prospecto ciprofloxacino alter cialis tablete cena u apotekama keflex for purchase non prescription diltiazem lopid cost without insurance buy eulexin 5 precio de viagra o similares finasteride generico precio mexico menosan in croatia terramycin usage brand voveran sr for sale buy once-daily cialis aspirin in pregnancy first trimester cytotec where to buy quickly most reliable place to buy bactrim online dilantin rxlist generic entocort switzerland celexa withdrawal symptoms mayo is buying medicine from canada legal cozaar losartan tablets generic aciclovir usa pharmacy paxil suppositories buy skelaxin capsules betnovate women buy tinidazole dose hoodia online order generic coreg cr 20 mg buy cyklokapron online cheap where can i buy live tilapia in the uk cialis or viagra forum risperdal consta storage temperature silagra online sales acai discount coupon requip generic picture cheapest zithromax online rx side effect of synthroid medicine alberta canada pharmacy board exam buy bentyl patch where to buy prevacid 30 mg tamoxifen citrate buy uk ephedraxin on the internet xenical tablets do they work comprar betnovate original en madrid luvox discount coupons pariet 10 mg qty 14 cheap genuine nymphomax online viagra jelly order in the us iv levaquin shortage evista commercial trusted online drugs adipex doxycycline online no prescription uk discover egypt game order generic diabecon buy biaxin online overnight delivery viagra for men how it works cheap hyzaar 40 mg current price ginseng 2010 florinef shortage use of ciplox-tz tablets illegal drugs in canada list rumalaya refill pack order mentat ds syrup generic pyridium no prescription zestoretic to buy in australia order celebrex tablets pulse methylprednisolone multiple sclerosis buy albendazole new zealand online can you buy femcare over the counter cheapest glucotrol xl brand advair diskus cost in canada purchase keflex florida himcolin ditropan pills buy online how much does lipitor cost at costco esomeprazole tablets ip paroxetine sandoz 20 mg side effects cheap bupron sr 100 mg can you buy atacand without stieva a cream 0.025 for wrinkles generic requip side effects addiction to pain pills warning signs ventolin for daily use canada buy zofran 10 what is ashwagandha herb good for online pharmacy cheap voltaren aricept cost cvs grifulvin v 40 mg pharmacy antivert over the counter amaryl ships from india albendazole medication order can i get pregnant while on zoloft can you buy viagra otc canada celexa weight gain statistics list of tesco stores selling minocin what is mirapex made of accutane depression lawsuit canada order malegra fxt tablets nizoral cream order online phenergan dosage for dogs metformin cost per pill can i get high from furosemide best site get levitra super active fucidin side effects long term use miembro de tokio hotel sufre sobredosis de viagra generic from lanoxin buy zolpidem sleeping tablets uk good viagra the little blue pill which uk site to buy ditropan canadian health measures survey results cost of generic femara generic sinemet in usa
Home

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1147 guests online

Atom RSS

Interview - Andrew Zimbalist - Sports Economist PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
The Biz of Baseball - Interviews
Written by Maury Brown   
Sunday, 08 August 2004 12:00

Andrew ZimbalistWhen the discussion of the economics of baseball are discussed in the media and beyond, most often you'll find Andrew Zimbalist in the mix.

This interview covers the debate over the public subsidy of stadium development, to territorial rights, especially as it pertains to the Baltimore/Washington, D.C. area, to the current revenue sharing system, plus more, Zimbalist covers all the bases.


The numbers are staggering.

Since 1992, when Bud Selig took over as Commissioner of Baseball, there have been 15 new or renovated ballparks. In the case of the new ballparks, all have had some form of public subsidy involved, totaling well in excess of a billion dollars when all is said and done and leases are fulfilled. This new stadium development is touted by MLB as being a panacea towards overall franchise success, regardless of the fact that many see franchise sustainability being coupled, in large part, to wins and losses as well.

With this large volume of stadia development has been the constant struggle to try to quantify the economic impacts of ballpark development within local, state and regional domains, and one of the most visible economists to speak to this current environment has been Andrew Zimbalist.

Zimbalist serves as Robert A. Woods Professor of Economics at Smith College and his resume is  peppered with consultation as it pertains to baseball. To Wendell, Chritton & Parks in the Florida State League/Florida Marlins arbitration case, to the Major League Baseball Players' Association in collective bargaining, to ABRY Communications in a baseball broadcasting suit, to the United Baseball League, to Krendl, Horowitz and Krendl in Ehrhardt v. Colorado Rockies, to the Portland Oregon Mayor's Commission on bringing another professional sports team to the city, the list is far too long to mention in this space.

To add to this, Andrew has several outstanding books on the economics of baseball. "Baseball and Billions: A Probing Look Inside the Big Business of Our National Pastime", and "May the Best Team Win: Baseball Economics and Public Policy" can be found on the desks of those ranging from politicians, to fellow economists, to baseball researchers.

The following interview covers several areas, from the economics of new stadium development, to the shifting of discretionary income as it pertains to this development, to the territorial claims by Orioles owner Peter Angelos regarding the possible relocation of the Montreal Expos to Washington, D.C., and possible ramifications to further relocation or expansion, to the overall health of small to mid-tiered markets under the current revenue sharing plan. Enjoy! - Maury Brown


BizBall: You’ve been following the economics of baseball for some time now. What has been the biggest fundamental change in how MLB conducts business over the last 10-20 years?

Zimbalist:
I would think that the biggest change has been the introduction of its revenue sharing system in 1996 and the extension of that system in 2002. Prior to that system the only thing that got shared in baseball was gate revenue. And in the American League they shared about 20% of gate revenue, and the National League about 5% of gate revenue. There was a program that they introduced in the 80’s to do some sharing in the American League of pay cable back then, but basically it amounted to just about nothing. So fundamentally out of all the revenue that got generated they only had either the 20% [shared] in the American League and roughly 5% in the National League; nothing else was shared.

And then when local television contracts really began to take off -- the Yankee contract that was signed with MSG back in 1988 was a 12 year contract worth $493 million over the period -- you had the emergence of TBS with the Braves and WGN with the Cubs, and the Mets had a big contract, the Red Sox got a big contract, baseball’s revenues became very sharply imbalanced.

And, the other thing that’s happening of course in the early 90’s is the introduction of the new stadiums, beginning with Camden Yards, or some people might want to date it to a year earlier in 1991 with the new White Sox stadium. But the retro-set architecture stadiums begins with ‘92 Camden Yards. Those stadiums for many teams ended up generating an extra $30 million a year for the team, so that together with the local television contracts and no revenue sharing meant that the revenue disparities between top and the bottom teams, which were actually no greater than $30 million back in 1989, all of the sudden exploded, so that by the end of the 90’s those disparities are up over $200 million. Or around $200 million, let’s say.

And in this context baseball introduced the revenue sharing system. I think it’s a really major change. It required a shift in political alignments, to get the big city teams to go along with that, to get Steinbrenner to go along with that, O’Malley at the time still owned the Dodgers, to get him to go along with it in ’96, to get the Chicago teams to go along with it, the Tribune Corporation, was a major political accomplishment. And they began sharing revenues, so I think that’s the big number, and of course as I’ve said elsewhere the system doesn’t work as well as it ought to because the incentives that are built into it are perverse, they’re backwards, they actually assess a higher marginal tax rate on low revenue teams than on high revenue teams. It therefore in my view has not done what it is supposed to do, which is to equalize payrolls.

BizBall: A common claim among economists is that spending on sports simply shifts spending from other entertainment options (movies, etc.). This theory assumes that most individuals have a finite amount of discretionary income to spend on entertainment. Some might argue that a high percentage of Americans have enough discretionary income to choose to attend most of the entertainment events that they would like to attend. If season ticket holders of an MLB team suddenly lost their franchise, would it follow that each season ticket holder would add 81 nights of other entertainment activities annually to their life?

Zimbalist: [laughter] Well, first of all, I don’t think that season ticket holders go to all 81 games. Most of them don’t, anyway; I think they end up sharing their ticket, or giving away their ticket to some other people, at least for some of the games. But no, I don’t think it follows that way, and look, I don’t think the proper argument is that there is a 1-to-1 trade off here. The argument is simply that for most people who go to ballgames they have a finite amount of discretionary income and there is a substitution effect working, but again, it’s not a 1-to-1 effect, maybe it effects 80% or 90% of the money that would otherwise get spent at the ballpark.
And it certainly is not the only basis for the argument that there is no positive economic impulse or developmental impulse from having a new stadium or a new team in your town.

One of the reasons is the substitution effect, but another very important reason is the leakage effect. Which is to say that if money gets spent at a ballpark, something like 60% of it on average goes to players, who have an average income of $2.4 million, and when money goes to those players, and most players don’t live in the town where their team is anyway, then the money leaks out, because a millionaire has a very high savings rate, much higher savings rate than somebody with ordinary income, thirty or forty thousand dollars, and that money they save goes into the world money markets, it doesn’t get spent at the local cities, and even more that’s true because the player doesn’t live in the city, so his permanent home is elsewhere, or if he has family elsewhere, a lot of the money gets sent back to the family.

And, also players are encouraged, and most of them follow the encouragement or the advice, they’re encouraged to save a lot because their life in baseball and their lifetime earning the mega-salaries is a very short one.

It’s not like what happens to me, an economics professor. I got into the business of being an economics professor when I was 25 years old and I could do that for decades, but for professional baseball players if you’re lucky you play 5 to 10 years and you don’t earn the mega-salaries your whole life. So, they’re encouraged to save a lot of money, and again the pattern is for the money to go into the world money markets and not to be spent in the local cities. So, there are leakages. And, of course, a lot of money goes to the owners and the owners have a similar pattern to the players, and those leakages are much higher than if the entertainment dollar gets spent at the bowling alley or restaurants, where the money ultimately goes to entrepreneurs who have a much more normal income, and who live in the local towns. So, very high leakages are another factor here. And, another factor still is that ballparks these days get financed with hundreds of millions of dollars of local tax money and if taxes go up then it means that that money is not being spent by consumers in other areas of the local economy. Either that or the city might rig -- I guess I’m not sure about this --either the services, and either higher taxes or lower services doesn’t help the local economy. So, if you put all of those effects together, the empirical research suggests that the expectation should not be that you get an increase in employment or an increase in per capita income.

BizBall: What about in cases where there are personal income taxes in some states? Wouldn’t there be money collected from the players and management in that framework?

Zimbalist: Yeah, there would be, but again the evidence is that the amount of expenditure that goes out of the public coffers in order to finance the debt service that they have to incur to build the stadium, or to improve the infrastructure, or both of those things, the amount of outflow is greater than the amount of inflow.

BizBall: Along the same lines, in the case of several cities, and possibly some new locations should relocation or expansion be considered, there are cities that border other states. Is there a case to be made that monies from bordering states cross over into these locales and therefore help the economies of these host cities via tourism?

Zimbalist: Yeah, sure, and in fact I made that case in part with the New York Nets leaving New Jersey and going into New York, in this case Brooklyn. So it can happen.

There are possibilities for, in essence, cannibalizing revenue across state lines.

And if what you’re interested in is the fiscal situation of a government on one side of the state line as opposed to the other side of the state line, yeah, there can be a shift in that way. It doesn’t end up producing a tremendous amount of difference, but there can be a small gain as a result of that.

It’s a different argument than an argument for regional development, though, because in terms of the overall metropolitan area the money is still in that area. But it might very well cross a political boundary and help one side of the boundary to the detriment to the other side.

BizBall: How much of the financial forecasting that MLB presents to the press and government do you feel is done to leverage the public in terms of stadium development and for collective bargaining purposes?


Zimbalist: Some of it. I tend to believe that those are not the main motivations today. Of course historically the other factor has been to hold on to the anti-trust exemption, or the  presumed anti-trust exemption, when they testify to Congress. But more recently I think the strongest motivation that teams have to color their financial picture is to avoid revenue sharing. That is to say, if you can push your revenue off your baseball books onto your media books or onto your stadium books, or some other, as in the case of the Chicago Cubs onto their premium ticket company, then you can avoid some of baseball’s revenue sharing taxes. So I think there are a variety of motivations to do that, but it’s hard to believe in this day and age that Don Fehr or Gene Orza or Mike Weiner are very misled by claims of penury that either Selig issues for all baseball or individual teams issue. Because they’ve been down that road and they know the game pretty well.


BizBall: On that note about dispersal of revenues, the Yankees and Red Sox have been talking about doing a merger of TV packages. Do you think this continues to blur the line for revenue sharing purposes?

Zimbalist: Well, first of all, that story is simply the product of our idiotic media. There’s no truth to that story.

BizBall: Could you elaborate?

Zimbalist: I mean, look, what happens in a situation like that is that there are two people who are having a conversation over a drink who are connected to either the Yankees or the Red Sox, and there’s a third person there, and this person happens to hear one of them who sort of throws out this idea that they might bat around for thirty seconds or something. So that third person then calls up his friend who’s a journalist and the journalist wants to break the story so he goes out and writes the story. But I don’t think there’s any factual basis to the story. I’ve spoken to owners on both sides and they disclaim any such notions and even if you just look at it logically it’s absurd.

Number one, baseball has television territories that it would violate, and they’d have to get MLB’s permission. Number two, they’d be inviting anti-trust scrutiny from the Justice Department if they tried to combine forces and get more leverage in the cable television market. Number three, any synergies they might get that would increase their revenues would then have to be shared between the two teams. Number four, the Yankees and the Red Sox play at similar times during the day, or at the same time during the day, very often, and they have competing claims on the time.

There’s just an infinite number of complications. And number five, and perhaps most importantly, the Yankees and the Red Sox have gone out of their way to develop a classic baseball rivalry, and if they start jumping into television bed together it totally undermines the perception of that rivalry. And quite apart from personality differences that might make it a complicated thing to do, I don’t think it ever made any sense, and it’s just one journalist trying to get a jump on a story based on a silly rumor.

BizBall: Peter Angelos has made quite a lot of noise about fan attendance and cable share being diluted for the Orioles should the Montreal Expos relocate to DC or Northern VA. Do you subscribe to those arguments?

Zimbalist: Well, I think he’s correct that there would be some dilution in his television ratings and some dilution in his attendance. Whether the reductions would be 5%, 10%, or 15% in each case, I don’t know. I don’t think it would be more than 15%. But basically I would say to him, “Tough noogies.” You’ve got two substantial media markets there and  you can host two teams in those markets. I mean, you might as well have Jerry Reinsdorf come along and say, “Hey, the Cubs dilute my revenues.” And that would be true, too. So Reinsdorf might as well go to Major League Baseball and petition Bud Selig, and say, “Hey, Bud, you’re my friend. I’ve supported you. The Tribune Company really isn’t your friend. Why don’t we just eliminate the Chicago Cubs?” And to me, logically, there’s not too much difference in those two arguments. Politically it might be a little different, of course, because it’s harder to eliminate a team that’s been around for time immemorial than it is to create a new team into a market.

But, D.C. used to have a team. In fact, they used to have two different teams, and I think it’s a premier market and they ought to have a team. And whether or not Angelos ends up effecting Selig in the ultimate decision by baseball, I don’t know, but certainly I don’t think that he should.

BizBall: Buried deep within the wording of a bill before congress is verbiage that would allow sports franchises the same ability of other business to write off 100% percent of their intangible assets, such as TV revenues, on an evenly divided basis over 15 years, as opposed to the current system which only allows for half of the assets. Beyond the huge windfall for sports owners for long-term investment, is this simply a case of having all businesses treated equally?

Zimbalist: No, it’s not.

First of all, you can’t amortize goodwill; that rule has changed, so businesses don’t get to amortize or depreciate all of their assets. Secondly, look, they might go for public relations purposes and say that this is to treat sports franchises the same as other businesses but the fact of the matter is that sports franchises, which might be valued depending on the league and the team anywhere from $100 million to $1 billion, don’t have many hard assets to establish that value. The main thing that a sports franchise has is a berth in a monopoly sports league which you could call goodwill, you could call it a going concern, and if you want you can somewhat falsely attribute it to television or other media contracts.

The IRS has always historically said that television contracts are non-depreciating assets or non-amortizing assets. They are always renewed. In other words, if I buy a car, it depreciates each year, it gets a little less valuable each year, that’s a physical deterioration that happens. But if I buy a baseball team and the baseball team buys a local television contract, if you go back and look at the historical records, when that contract is over there’s always a new one! And historically it’s always been a larger one. But whether it’s larger or not, the value is pretty much ongoing. Now in some cases something might happen that’s unanticipated, and then you might have an impairment of the asset, and they ought to be able to account for an impairment of assets, but generally speaking, baseball teams and other sports teams, almost all of their value is intangible.

In contrast, if you look at a manufacturing company, most of their value is tangible. They’ve got machinery, they’ve got technology, they’ve got patents, and so on. And therefore if you allow them to amortize some of their intangible assets, it’s going to be a minority of their  overall asset value. But if you allow a sports team to amortize the intangibles, you’re basically allowing them to amortize the whole thing. So it’s different for sports than for other businesses.

And to me the more fundamental question is, what is the theoretical basis for saying there’s any depreciation at all in the tangible assets? And I don’t think there is one. And so I see it as an improper give away, and I see it as once again as kind of absurd politicking wherein you have special interests who get politicians whom they donate money to to stick it onto a bill that has nothing to do with the operation of sports franchises.

BizBall: From an economic perspective, is MLB going to be able to have sustainable and healthy franchises in existing smaller markets, and how does this impact possible relocation of franchises and/or expansion?

Zimbalist: Well, it all depends on the economic system that baseball has. If baseball has a sound revenue sharing system they can put teams in smaller markets. But it also depends in part on what you mean by smaller market. Is Portland, Oregon a smaller market because it has fewer than three million people? Well, I don’t think so. It seems to me that Portland, Oregon is perfectly capable of hosting a sports team in a league that’s properly designed. And Portland is a town that has been experiencing very good population growth and looking down the road they ought to be able to have a baseball team. As should some other cities. I guess you could argue that Nintendo should make the same argument that Angelos does: “My goodness, if you put a team in Portland there’ll be some dilution in our fanbase!” And that’s true. They’ll be some. But whether it’s 2%, 4%, or 5%, or 6%, who knows? But also, who cares? Because the people of Portland deserve a baseball team just as much as the people of Seattle do.

BizBall: I think they’re hand-wringing over this situation because it really does open up and set precedent if they pay off Angelos when he doesn’t have territorial rights to D.C. And it opens up a can of worms, like you’re saying with Howard Lincoln and Nintendo, Seattle and Portland, even though it’s 175 miles away they deem this a territorial market from a regional cable perspective and radio broadcast perspective.

Zimbalist: Look, I’ll tell you what, you have two territories for a baseball team. One is the physical territory; it used to be determined by 75 miles, now it’s defined in terms of counties.

And then you have another market--that’s the television market--that is much broader. And in fact the television markets span territories so that they bump up against each other. And therefore, they cover the whole country.

And so there’s no reason why Major League Baseball would not allocate like the whole state of Arkansas to a team, like the Houston Astros, for instance. They wouldn’t say, “Oh well, you know, it’s more than X number of miles from your ballpark and therefore you can’t have it.” No, they’re not going to leave the potential fans in Arkansas without access on local cable to watching a team.

So what they do is allocate: television markets are allocated to everybody in the United States. Therefore, whenever you contemplate adding a team you’d be interfering with somebody’s television market. And if you held that argument as decisive that, “Oh, you’re taking away part of this guy’s television market,” then you’d never be able to have expansion. Not now and not in forty years. Even when the U.S. population might be 350 million instead of 290 million. So that argument can’t possibly be a conclusive argument in my view.

BizBall: How much of the current growth in MLB is attributed to the recent honeymoon effect of new stadium development and do you see a trend in which there will be repercussions when these honeymoon periods fade?

Zimbalist: The honeymoon effect is very short-lived unless the owner is smart enough to take advantage of it.

A new stadium gives the owner an opportunity to get more revenue out of his players, and if his players generate more revenue they should be paid more. And so the smart owner says, I’m going to take advantage of my new stadium by increasing my payroll and putting a better team on the field, and getting my fans really excited. If the owner does that you can get a honeymoon effect that lasts five, six, seven, eight years.

If the owner doesn’t do that, then there’s a curiosity effect that can last two or three months, after which the fans get ticked off that the owner isn’t doing anything to improve the team. So honeymoon effects are very differential. It depends on the strengths and acumen of ownership.

That said, yes, of course, baseball has had a building renaissance, since 1991, and that renaissance has, although some teams more than others, that renaissance has generally raised attendance appreciably. And as the newness of some of these stadiums fades into the past, they won’t have that factor to boost attendance anymore. So other things being equal, yeah, that would make attendance drop a little bit.

BizBall: In your book, May the Best Team Win, you talk about how the Yankees have incentives to increase their stadium expenses, new stadia development, and a number of other areas. The last Chapter is entitled, “What is to be done?” Can you touch on this facet of the book, and tell us if any of the points within that chapter have changed since publication?

Zimbalist: You mean things that I would recommend?

BizBall: Yes.

Zimbalist: Well, I wrote that book at a time when baseball was talking about contracting by two or four teams. And I believe that as long as baseball maintains that posture, especially after a period where its revenues have been growing by 15-16% per year, that the U.S. Congress ought to go after baseball and say, “We’ve had enough. Your demand is increasing by 15% a year. If you want to reduce your output, we’re going to force you guys to have competition so that we can have an appropriate level of output.” Meaning more baseball teams rather than less baseball teams when demand is growing at 15% a year.

That’s what I believe.

And I believe in general that it would better serve U.S. fans, U.S. consumers, to have more competition in the baseball industry. But I don’t believe, at this point in time, that it’s in the cards, because baseball isn’t talking about contraction anymore, and therefore it makes more sense when talking about policy to focus on more realistic policy options.

And for me the most important thing for baseball to do is to get their revenue sharing system right. Because this year they’re going to be sharing about $280 million, top teams to the bottom teams, and it’s not going to do anything, in my view, to improve competitive balance. Because the bottom teams face this higher tax rate than the top teams. And payroll disparity has actually grown since 2002 when this new revenue sharing system was introduced.

So, I think they need to get their incentives right.

Right now the way the incentive system works in the revenue sharing system is that successful teams get penalized, and poorly performing teams are rewarded. Failure is rewarded and success is penalized. And I think you need to have a revenue sharing system that does the opposite, where teams are motivated to improve themselves. And so that would be the first thing that I would change.

Second thing that I would change, although I recognize that Bud Selig has done some good things, I don’t think baseball’s commissioner should be an owner. And I think that Selig’s  botched a lot of stuff. And so I think they need to replace Selig. I don’t think that they will, but I think they need to replace Selig, get some independent, intelligent, outside businessperson who knows a great deal about baseball, and leads the sport in a way that doesn’t suggest that there’s any conflict of interest, or that there’s any inability on the part of the commissioner to act in the best interests of baseball rather than the best interests of a coterie of owners.

BizBall: I understand that you have another book slated to be published. Can you tell us about it?

Zimbalist: Very briefly, I’m writing a book with Stefan Szymanski, who’s a British sports economist. What we’re doing is looking at the evolution of basically soccer leagues and the evolution of baseball and other closed leagues in the United States. Soccer Leagues in Europe and throughout the rest of the world are organized on an open basis and systems of promotion and relegation, where the top teams in the league get promoted to a higher level league, and the bottom teams in the league get demoted or relegated to a lower level league.

That system creates a very different pattern of incentives and fan responses than the closed system that we have in the United States, closed meaning that the existing owners determine if there will be expansion, and if there is expansion, who gets to own a team. And that creates a system of leverage and monopoly that gives teams an ability to extort large public subsidies and deprives fans in many cities of getting to have a professional team, when they warrant one, given the economic size of the city.

So, these are very, very different ways of organizing sports leagues, and they generate very different kinds of tensions and problems, and have different kinds of successes.

So what we're trying to do in the book is to explain how the systems are different, explain why they evolved the way that they did, looking at economic and political and cultural factors.

And then, finally, trying to figure out where the systems are heading, and whether the two systems can learn anything from each other.

The following interview was originally published on the SABR Business of Baseball website, and can be read here: SABR Business of Baseball Interviews Page

Interview conducted by Maury Brown on 8/9/04. Edited by Jeff Sackmann.

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?