wellbutrin 150 mg nebenwirkungen prednisone teva 5 mg xenical dosage mg viagra 25 mg effetti viagra 200mg dose precio xenical 120 mg augmentin 1 mg compresse levitra 10 mg 12 stk costo viagra generico buy viagra online 35008 lisinopril 20 mg hydrochlorothiazide generic cialis 20mg cytotec 200mg misoprostol 1000 mg cytotec online cialis unbeatable viagra cheapest paypal cipro 500 mg ilac buying liquid viagra metformin generic drugs clomid 50mg steroids levitra 10mg gde medicamento zithromax 500 mg viagra buy orlando viagra information online doxycycline buy europe strattera mg 60 cialis reviews online lisinopril 10 mg tabs bactrim generic drug prednisone buying online order nolvadex online bula zovirax 200mg clomid 50 mg bfp generic cialis 80 mg valtrex cheap mexico clomid 50mg success 2012 generic 50 mg cialis cheapests priced cialis cialis 10 mg kosten diflucan 150 mg use dose 40 mg cialis metformin 1000 mg dosage 522 mg wellbutrin nexium 20 mg dejstvo celebrex 100 mg capsules cialis soft 60mg wellbutrin 500 mg 5mg lexapro tablets viagra stockholm buy diflucan 150 mg capsulas cheapist 30 brand cialis zovirax oral generic buy cheap viagra 100 online herbal viagra viagra plus generic cheap viagra miami augmentin dosage 1000 mg cialis professionnel 20 mg cheap 200 mg cialis order nexium india 50mg clomid men prijs cialis 5 mg will cialis generic cialis 5 mg dzialanie clomid pct mg cialis online italia buy cheap celebrex cialis online free clomid 100mg online interresults order viagra cheap cialis generic 1.00 metformin er 750 mg cialis 40mg tablets levitra 10 mg funciona zovirax 800 mg cost lisinopril dosage mg cialis d40 mg lisinopril 10 mg cost lexapro at 5mg compra cialis 5 mg 150 mg viagra dangers buy viagra bahrain synthroid 25 mg bula viagra 2 pills online propecia purchase generic erythromycin 500 mg dosierung levitra 20mg 50 tab max viagra 100mg glucophage 850 mg prix viagra 100mg usa lisinopril 3759 buy lexapro 20mg night valtrex online consultation cheapest cialis 40 mg kamagra buy usa metformin online sale doxycycline 200 mg online augmentin 600 mg packungsbeilage cialis 5mg buy propecia generic generic cialis ph manfaat xenical 120 mg diflucan capsules 50mg branded levitra 20 mg fake viagra 800mg buy cytotec uk generic zoloft greenstone lexapro 10mg receita uses celebrex 200 mg cheap zovirax ointment propecia generic wallmart doxycycline 20 online valtrex versus generic augmentin 825 mg dosage buy cipro hc viagra generico ultrafarma cialis 20mg slovenia generic levitra cheapest ordering generic levitra amoxil 400 mg bula order nexium uk lexapro generic online order deltasone prednisone generic cialis 20 online nolvadex 20 mg astrazeneca 1200 mg zithromax chlamydia wellbutrin generic coupon order cialis 5 mg posologia augmentin 875 mg propecia oral 5mg levitra schmelztabletten 5mg uk online viagra zovirax suspension 200mg buy viagra pifzer cialis 5mg us nexpro generic nexium synthroid 137 mg viagra tabletas 25 mg augmentin apteka online cialis generico 40 mg 40 mg prednisone daily propranolol sintaser 10 mg cialis 20mg billig propecia online belgium cialis e genericos cialis 20 mg foro lisinopril buy cheap generic viagra doses cheap cialis levitra 20 mg works priligy 30 mg compresse viagra buyers india xenical roche order medicamento generico xenical lexapro 10mg escitalopram cialis daily 2.5 mg zithromax 500mg tab synthroid generic mylan diflucan 150 mg 2x diflucan 200mg pret levitra pricing 20 mg priligy 60 mg filmtabletten canada celebrex online zithromax 500 mg alkohol doxycycline hcl 100 mg hydrochlorothiazide 25 mgs viagra cialis generico viagra 150mg buy viagra 25mg young cialis 5 mg ho lisinopril ratiopharm 20 mg lisinopril 20mg tab generic cialis exist cialis 5mg boner augmentin 325 mg bad generic wellbutrin lisinopril 2 5 mg efek cialis 80 mg zithromax 500 mg dosierung cheap lexapro 10 mg 45 mg buspar prednisone 1000mg day buy cheap metformin generic propecia erfahrung viagra pfizer 150mg strattera 25 mg cost dapoxetine tablets 30 mg lisinopril 0.25 mg zovirax tablets generic tetracycline 500 mg acne viagra 50 mg contraindicaciones cheap propecia 5 mg cialis 5mg rezeptfrei generic viagra boots online order propecia levitra 20mg information mg viagra propecia 1mg works augmentin 625 mg lupin lisinopril 40 mg cialis 2.5mg walgreens synthroid order canada generic levitra warnings lisinopril 5 mg w 928 nexium 20mg indication lexapro nausea 5mg metformin 500mg 3 times nolvadex 10 mg pregnancy discount 100mg viagra zovirax 800 mg dosis zithromax injection 500mg lisinopril 30 mg cost buy valtrex cvs clomid at 25 mg doxycycline buy overnight viagra generic 24 doxycycline purchase online diflucan 200 mg online prescription viagra 100mg xenical 500mg 125 mg. viagra glucophage metformin 500 mg 40 mg levitra online clomid 50mg ohss generic cialis milwaukee cialis 5 versus 20mg medicamento clomid 50mg lexapro online australia viagra 12.5mg experience doxycycline capsule 100mg viagra 100 mg dosage 400 mg of wellbutrin prednisone strength 20 mg cheapest viagra buy cheap viagra order generic strattera us 100 to 150 mg zoloft generico priligy portugal prednisone apotex 5 mg buy strattera cialis dosage 5mg wellbutrin panic disorder strattera becoming generic buy levitra cialis cheapest cialis 80 30 cialis 5mg europe generic viagra lexapro 20 mg efficacy viagra generico efectos xenical 120 mg kapsler buy nolvadex melbourne cheap propecia buy buy viagra bangkok 2013 canadian cheap levitra 40 zoloft dosage 100mg doxycycline doze 75mg nexium 20mg tablets difference viagra generic cialis 5 mg gabapentin viagra online jelly lexapro 20mg review viagra online 4rx assunzione cialis 10 mg augmentin 375 mg viagra 50mg kaufen lexapro 5mg ce cheap mexican cialis buy levitra women cialis generic cheap cialis posologia 20 mg amoxil 250 mg 5ml viagra bestellen 100mg wellbutrin generic companies levitra 20mg dose kamagra 100mg informatie strattera de 25 mg took 10 mg cialis nexium 10 mg preparacion metformin 500 mg po synthroid cytomel online levitra originale online wellbutrin 400 mg day prednisone 4 mg daily ordering cialis online kupovina xenical buy clomid montreal priligy buy usa cipro online sales augmentin tm 625 mg cialis generic timeline buy viagra sildenafil lasix 40 mg austria tadalafil generic viagra india cialis online generic cialis 200mg buy cialis discover cialis 40 mg ok levitra online cheap buy zithromax cheap dapoxetine hydrochloride 30 mg brand cialis 40 mg cialis 2 5 mg opinioni buy propecia turkey buy viagra edinburgh strattera 40 mg high synthroid generic alternative pauto cialis 20 mg glucophage 1000 mg tablets tetracycline 250 mg availability clomid 50mg usa synthroid 0.225 mg buy lisinopril 20mg mg doxycycline acne buy cialis brand lisinopril 40 mg buy 40 mg cialis usa remedio nexium generico ultrafarma viagra generico purchase clomid cheap buy viagra login anyone 40mg cialis get nexium online prednisone 5mg 6 taller bijsluiter diflucan 150 mg nexium generic costco generic cheap cialis levitra 20mg apotheke 100mg doxycycline dosage british levitra online viagra 100 mg beragena levitra 20 mg mg strattera lexapro over 20 mg cheap lexapro alternative order Cialis 10 cialis cheap canadian real generic cialis cytotec genericos valtrex 1000 mg cost buy alli orlistat order cialis sample propranolol 40 mg la generic synthroid ingredients kamagra 100 mg uputstvo zoloft generic version tetracycline 250mg capsules effets levitra 40 mg lexapro 2.5 mg tablet nolvadex 20mg bula anagen viagra generico generic cialis 10 mg. nogales buying viagra order celebrex uk cialis 5mg portugues cialis online acquisto 1mg propecia cost levitra generico farmacia viagra de 200 mg 50 mg of lexapro levitra 10 mg bucodispersable 50mg clomid cheap cialis soft 12.5 mg furosemide lasix clomid ml mg generic viagra st phenergan 50 mg im cialis 40 mg difference kamagra tablete 100 mg bangalore viagra online doxycycline 100mg kaufen 50 mg lexapro online levitra buy glucophage 850 mg anwendung purchase 5mg cialis cialis 30 mg erection online drugs cialis drug lisinopril 5mg order propecia online 503 metformin 1000 mg benefits erfahrungsberichte cialis 10 mg cipro online overnight generic propecia competition cialis 25mg purchasing viagra online propranolol 40 mg efectos generico para viagra test cialis 10mg levitra 20 mg reimport buy glucophage usa zovirax ointment order cialis online germany erythromycin ethylsuccinate 500 mg efeitos viagra 25mg erythromycin suspension 400 mg clomid online cheap comprimes cialis 5mg generic levitra 20 mg nome generico bactrim 1600 mg zoloft generic levitra images generic 10mg levitra iui clomid 25mg cialis 20 mg utilizzo kamagra online cheapest celebrex 200 mg pdf kamagra 100 mg prodaja celebrex 200mg srbija buy metformin india mail order kamagra doxycycline trihydrate 750 mg erythromycin order precio celebrex 200 mg lasix 40 mg pills pastillas metformin 500 mg levitra generico venezuela lasix 20 mg iw zovirax order augmentin 675 mg dosage levitra 20mg apteka buy 100mg clomid xenical 120 mg precio will valtrex generic celebrex 200 mg indicatii thuoc propranolol 40mg cialis 10 mg sulit strattera de 80 mg celebrex generic 200mg viagra online 25mg online levitra generic propecia dosage mg generic drugs cialis generic propecia august 2013 thuoc metformin 1000mg phenergan 50 mg pregnancy ordering nexium canada generici del cialis wellbutrin sr 200mg zithromax 2mg xenical online canada rischi cialis generico synthroid generic 2012 levitra generico orosolubile celebrex online canada securetabsonline cialis 20mg cytotec sale online lexapro generic wiki clomid generic 50mg viagra online 100mg clomid 50 mg ovulation cytotec tablets 200 mg propranolol 25 mg celebrex mims online foros viagra generico viagra generic au nolvadex 20 mg contraindicaciones generic toronto viagra valtrex cheap online amoxil bd 500mg cialis 8 mg cheap cheap cialis celebrex 200mg pfizer clomid 50mg tabs thuoc propecia 1mg levitra compresse 10 mg 20 mg cialis sufficient generico viagra online order viagra 150 mg buy lisinopril india buy cheap propecia viagra online amsterdam erythromycin 250 mg ulotka kamagra apteka online valtrex buy generic cialis france online xenical 120 mg wiki wellbutrin sr buy propecia 1mg canada doxycycline 100mg usage kamagra 100mg opis viagra 25 mg ausreichend viagra soho buy cialis 10 mg lilly clomid 50 mg success doxycycline cheapest 50 mg viagra cialis ontario viagra online india generic viagra singapore levitra buy buy doxycycline pattaya generic nexium 2013 cialis 40 and 100 mg lisinopril tab 20mg achat viagra 100mg indian generic cialis retirada genericos viagra prezzi levitra 5 mg commander cialis 10mg cialis instructions 20 mg buy viagra gels
Home BoB Documents 1900 - 1960 1953 - Toolson v New York Yankees

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 1242 guests online

Atom RSS

1953 - Toolson v New York Yankees PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 15
PoorBest 
1900 - 1960
Written by Court Ruling   
Monday, 29 November 1999 19:00

U.S. Supreme Court

TOOLSON v. NEW YORK YANKEES, 346 U.S. 356 (1953)

346 U.S. 356

TOOLSON v. NEW YORK YANKEES, INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *  
No. 18.
Argued October 13, 1953.
Decided November 9, 1953.

 

The judgments in these cases are affirmed on the authority of Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, 259 U.S. 200 , so far as that decision determines that Congress had no intention of including the business of baseball within the scope of the federal antitrust laws. Pp. 356-357.

200 F.2d 198, 202 F.2d 413, 428, affirmed.

 

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 23, Kowalski v. Chandler, Commissioner of Baseball, et al., argued October 13-14, 1953, and No. 25, Corbett et al. v. Chandler, Commissioner of Baseball, et al., argued October 14, 1953, both on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

 

Howard C. Parke argued the cause for petitioner in No. 18. With him on the brief was Gene M. Harris.

 

Frederic A. Johnson argued the cause for petitioner in No. 23 and Seymour Martinson argued the cause for petitioners in No. 25. With them on the briefs were Maurice H. Koodish and Edward Martinson.

 

Norman S. Sterry argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents in No. 18.

Raymond T. Jackson argued the cause for respondents in Nos. 23 and 25. With him on the briefs were Benjamin F. Fiery and Louis F. Carroll.

 

Thomas Reed Powell filed a brief for the Boston American League Base Ball Company in No. 18, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.

 

PER CURIAM.

 

 

Affirmed.

 

In 1952 the Subcommittee on Study of Monopoly Power, of the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, after extended hearings, issued a report dealing with organized baseball in relation to the Sherman Act. In that report it said:

 

"`Organized baseball' is a combination of approximately 380 separate baseball clubs, operating in 42 different States, the District of Columbia, Canada, Cuba, and Mexico . . . .

. . . . .

 

In the Federal Baseball Club case the Court did not state that even if the activities of organized baseball amounted to interstate trade or commerce those activities were exempt from the Sherman Act. The Court acted on its determination that the activities before it did not amount to interstate commerce. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in that case, in 1920, described a major league baseball game as "local in its beginning and in its end." 4 This Court stated that "The business is giving exhibitions of base ball, which are purely state affairs," and the transportation of players and equipment between states "is a mere incident . . . ." 5 The main thrust of the argument of counsel for organized baseball, both in the Court of Appeals and in this Court, was in support of that proposition. 6 Although counsel did argue that the activities of organized baseball, even if amounting to interstate commerce, did not violate the Sherman Act, 7 the Court significantly refrained from expressing its opinion on that issue.

 

 

The 1952 report of the Congressional Subcommittee previously mentioned also said:

"Under judicial interpretations of this constitutional provision [the commerce clause], the Congress has power to investigate, and pass legislation dealing with professional baseball, or more particularly `organized baseball,' if that business is, or affects, interstate commerce.

. . . . .

 

 

Footnotes

[ Footnote 1 ] Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 .

 

[ Footnote 2 ] Compare Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168, and Hooper v. California, 155 U.S. 648 , with United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn., 322 U.S. 533 , and Lorain Journal Co. v. United States, 342 U.S. 143 . See also, Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 ; United States v. National Assn. of Real Estate Boards, 339 U.S. 485 ; United States v. Crescent Amusement Co., 323 U.S. 173 ; American Medical Assn. v. United States, 317 U.S. 519 .

 

[ Footnote 3 ] H. R. Rep. No. 2002, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 4, 5.

 

"The primary sources of revenue for baseball clubs are admissions, radio and television, and concessions. The following table indicates the combined revenue of the 16 major-league clubs from these sources for the years 1929, 1939, and 1950.

"Major league revenue

"[In thousands of dollars] --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Source of revenue 1929 1. 1939 1950 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Home games ................... 6,559.1 6,766.6 18,334.8 Road games ................... 2,221.4 2,320.2 4,517.8 Exhibition games ............. 422.6 515.7 911.5 Radio and television ......... 0 884.5 3,365.5 Concessions (net) ............ 582.8 850.3 2,936.3 Other ........................ 733.4 776.0 1,969.6 -------------------------------------- Gross receipts .......... 10,519.5 12,113.3 32,035.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

 

"1. Data unavailable for 2 clubs: Chicago, American League; and Pittsburgh, National League.

. . . . .

"The fastest-growing source of revenue for major league clubs is radio and television. Receipts from these media of interstate commerce were nonexistent in 1929. In 1939, 7.3 percent of the clubs' revenue came from this source; and in 1950, this share rose to 10.5 percent.

 

"Portrayed in absolute terms, the growing importance of radio and television becomes even more pronounced. Receipts rose from nothing in 1929 to $884,500 in 1939 and $3,365,500 in 1950. Reported income from primary radio and television contracts for 1951 indicate that this sharp increase is continuing. . . . To this must be added $110,000 for the sale of radio and television rights to the 1951 all-star game and $1,075,000 for the sale of similar rights to the 1951 world series." Id., at 5-6.

 

[ Footnote 4 ] National League v. Federal Baseball Club, 50 App. D.C. 165, 169, 269 F. 681, 685.

 

[ Footnote 5 ] 259 U.S., at 208 , 209.

 

[ Footnote 6 ] See brief for appellants in the Court of Appeals, pp. 45-67; brief for defendants in error in this Court, pp. 45-66.

 

[ Footnote 7 ] See brief for appellants in Court of Appeals, pp. 68-72; brief for defendants in error in this Court, pp. 66-72.

 

[ Footnote 8 ] Hart v. Keith Vaudeville Exchange, 262 U.S. 271, 274 , and see North American Co. v. S. E. C., 327 U.S. 686, 694 .

 

[ Footnote 9 ] In opposing approval of four exclusionary bills then pending, the Subcommittee did not take the stand that organized baseball and other comparable sports, although constituting interstate trade or commerce, already are exempt from the broad coverage of the Sherman Act. On the contrary, it said:

 

 

[ Footnote 10 ] "The reserve clause is popularly believed to be some provision in the player contract which gives to the club in organized baseball which first signs a player a continuing and exclusive right to his services. Commissioner Frick testified that this popular understanding was essentially correct. He pointed out, however, that the reserve clause is not merely a provision in the contract, but also incorporates a reticulated system of rules and regulations which enable, indeed require, the entire baseball organization to respect and enforce each club's exclusive and continuous right to the services of its players." H. R. Rep. No. 2002, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 111. See also, Section VII, The Reserve Clause, id., at 111-139, and Gardella v. Chandler, 172 F.2d 402.

 

In No. 18 the following specific allegations appear and those in No. 23 are comparable:

"XI.

 

"That the Defendants, and each of them, have entered into or agreed to be bound by a contract in the restraint of Interstate Commerce; that said contract is designated as the Major-Minor League Agreement, dated December 6, 1946, and provides in effect that:

 

"1. All players' contracts in the Major Leagues shall be of one form and that all players' contracts in the Minor Leagues shall be of one form.

 

"2. That all players' contracts in any league must provide that the Club or any assignee thereof shall have the option to renew the player's contract each year and that the player shall not play for any other club but the club with which he has a contract or the assignee thereof.

 

.

"4. That the player shall be bound by any assignment of his contract by the club, and that his remuneration shall be the same as that usually paid by the assignee club to other players of like ability.

 

"5. That there shall be no negotiations between a player and any other club from the one which he is under contract or reservation respecting employment either present or prospective unless the Club with which the player is connected shall have in writing expressly authorized such negotiations prior to their commencement.

 

"6. That in the case of Major League players, the Commissioner of Baseball and in the case of Minor League players, the President of the National Association, may determine that the best interests of the game require a player to be declared ineligible and, after such declaration, no club shall be permitted to employ him unless he shall have been reinstated from the ineligible list.

 

"7. That an ineligible player whose name is omitted from a reserve list shall not thereby be rendered eligible for service unless and until he has applied for and been granted reinstatement.

 

"8. That any player who violates his contract or reservation, or who participates in a game with or against a club containing or controlled by ineligible players or a player under indictment for conduct detrimental to the good repute of professional baseball, shall be considered an ineligible player and placed on the ineligible list.

 

"9. That an ineligible player must be reinstated before he may be released from his contract.

 

"10. That clubs shall not tender contracts to ineligible players until they are reinstated.

 

"11. That no club may release unconditionally an ineligible player unless such player is first reinstated from the ineligible list to the active list.

. . . . .

"XIII.

 

 

The complaint also contains a separate cause of action alleging that the defendants, by virtue of their agreements, have entered into a combination and conspiracy in the restraint of trade or commerce among the several states, and another cause of action alleging that the defendants have, by their agreements, combined to monopolize professional baseball in the United States.

[ Footnote 11 ] E. g., Congress has expressly exempted certain specific activities from the Sherman Act, as in 6 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S.C. 17 (labor organizations), in the Capper-Volstead Act, 42 Stat. 388-389, 7 U.S.C. 291, 292 (farm cooperatives), and in the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 59 Stat. 34, 61 Stat. 448, 15 U.S.C. (Supp. V) 1013 (insurance). And see Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 310 U.S. 469, 501 , 512. [346 U.S. 356, 366] 
 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?