cipro xl 1000 mg cialis 1omg diflucan 150mg dosage prednisone buying wellbutrin 150 xl generic 4 days 10 mg prednisone lisinopril 20 mg bioequivalence strattera 60 mg cost levitra mg available zoloft 100mg tabs 750 mg of metformin price generic viagra cheap phenergan tablets xenical generic cost buy zithromax now zithromax 600 mg 5 day reviews lisinopril 20 mg propecia apteka online france buy viagra celebrex 200 mg r generic 5mg lexapro mejor viagra generica 5 m mg cialis cialis pills 10 mg viagra 800 mg pills erythromycin 40mg 10 mg viagra diflucan 50mg capsules cialis brand 10mg cheapest viagra real buy zithromax walmart preis kamagra 100mg buy priligy china lisinopril 20 mg appearance hydrochlorothiazide 500mg generic viagra now cialis 100 mg com ordering viagra online viagra generico ecuador generic viagra birmingham 5mg lexapro reviews doxycycline on backorder precio lisinopril 20 mg prednisone 8mg uk levitra 20 mg werking zoloft 50 vs. 100mg skachat propecia 1mg viagra de 25mg generic lexapro equivalent cialis 20 mg overdose prednisone 2.5 mg qualitest buy ranbaxy doxycycline buy synthroid canada wellbutrin 750mg capsulas xenical 120 mg cialis generico forum cheap viagra guaranteed buy viagra 100g erythromycin 400 mg tablets lisinopril 2.5mg tablets cialis and 2.5 mg priligy 30 mg n1 obat doxycycline 100mg viagra cheap nz buy 500 mg doxycycline lisinopril 40 mg info harga cialis 800 mg doxycycline hyclate 40 mg buy viagra lexapro 5mg generic experiencias viagra 50 mg order cialis fedex existe lexapro generico cialis online de viagra red 200mg 5mg lexapro panic experience 20mg lexapro buy priligy canada cheap kamagra paypal iv lasix 40 mg order bayer levitra prednisone generic buy celebrex drugstore generic propecia difference propranolol 80 mg lp tablet cialis 20 mg viagra 50 mg wirkungsdauer metformin hexal 1000 mg order levitra generic zithromax 1000 mg dosage clomid 50 mg pcos nexium 40 mg 7 price confezioni cialis 20 mg zovirax nombre generico 1oomg cialis wholesale prednisone 40 mg jour dosis propranolol 10 mg cialis pills cheap celebrex generic 100mg buy celebrex medication strattera 25 mg color cialis 5 mg information prednisone 10mg allergy diflucan buy pharmacy lasix 500 mg generic metformin 5 500 mg cialis online naruciti viagra cheap cod cialis cheap pharmacy erythromycin eth 400mg buy legtimate viagra prednisone 20 mg qualitest wellbutrin equivalent generic zoloft 50 mg prospect cialis 20 mg. cheasp cheapest lexapro 10mg bactrim de 400 mg diflucan dosage 50 mg viagra australia online 15 count 50mg viagra doxycycline 100 mg copd buy cipro paypal kamagra 50mg review kamagra cheap online propecia brand cheap kamagra viagra online drugs lasix generic viagra buy chennai buy lexapro uk doxycycline eg 200 mg viagra 50 mg dose lexapro generic march 14 levitra 10mg polska phenergan suppository 12.5 mg viagra bangalore online buy authentic levitra lisinopril online prescription mg in viagra levitra purchase online clomid 50 mg prezzo order cialis online doxycycline 100 mg medication prednisone tablets 1 mg mgs for cialis generic doxycycline 50 mg reputable cialis online nombre generico cytotec cialis 1800 mg order viagra paypal viagra 25mg sildenfil soft cialis 200mg citalopram buy online amoxil 500 mg cena generic doxycycline 100mg nolvadex shop online generico cialis andorra fungsi clomid 50mg cialis 10 mg cipla buying viagra strattera 25 mg generic buy lexapro mastercard zoloft 25 mg enough 400 mg doxycycline acne reliable online viagra viagra sildenafil 100 mg levitra uk online wellbutrin authorized generic celebrex 200 mg review viagra 150 mg india glucophage 100 mg lexapro withdrawal 40 mg buy propecia europe medication celebrex 200mg 50 mg clomid twins viagra japan buy cialis generica 40mg viagra online colombia augmentin 500mg wiki cheapest 1 mg propecia australlian generic viagra celebrex 200 mg bula amoxil 500 mg canada wellbutrin generic teva lexapro escitalopram 20mg 10mg levitra benefits generic viagra legal viagra blue 800mg xenical 120mg usa strattera generic drug cialis 5 mg bula prednisone 15mg 5ml cipro gold 4mg cheapest brand viagra metformin pfizer 1000 mg cialis 10 mg cene buying cialis tablets diflucan 150mg generico 800mg cialis reivew augmentin 875 125 mg filmtabletten cialis 5 mg torrinomedica cialis 20 mg comprimidos propranolol hci 40 mg cialis 5mg ultrafarma buy lisinopril 20 generic propecia sandoz lexapro 10mg high propecia 90 tablets cheap generica viagra cialis 10mg 4 cpr buy prednisone uk cipro 500mg generico tabletki xenical 120 mg levitra 20 mg doses propecia generic uk buy doxycycline onlinemalaysia phenergan creme buy diflucan 150 mg effetti cialis buy montreal sildenafil generic viagra wellbutrin 150 mg bijsluiter cialis 20mg order buy lasix cheap lasix 40 mg rezeptfrei zoloft purchase online clomid nome generico cialis 40 mg australia lexapro 10mg weight propecia online purchase valtrex generic ingredients doxycycline order 20 mg cialis cheap escitalopram lexapro 10 mg buy levitra bayer kamagra online store augmentin farmaco generico nebenwirkungen metformin 500 mg buy propecia china tadalafi cialis 500mg generic viagra spray preis cialis 5mg soft viagra online cialis online greece cialis 5mg forum drg generic viagra xenical tablets 120mg generic propecia effective viagra online 50mg 5mg prednisone safe to buy doxycycline clomid cheap buy propecia cvs phenergan 6.25mg dapoxetine 30mg price buy dapoxetine line pfizer online viagra buy cialis italy strattera 60 mg precio buy lisinopril 2.5 mg cheap fast kamagra kamagra 100 mg gold propranolol retard 40 mg zoloft sertralina angenerico generic levitra target bactrim 500 mg lexapro 20 mg night bactrim 800 mg viagra online reputable levitra order uk prednisone generic buy usda generic viagra cheap cytotec philippines viagra online contrareembolso buy cytotec generic viagra 110mg paypal metformin 500 mg pdf diflucan generico prezzo levitra online 20mg buy levitra mumbai buy propecia 5 mg strattera kullananlar 10 mg viagra 7.5 mg levitra schmelztablette 20mg viagra online dot 50 mg doxycycline blepharitis buy soft cialis nolvadex 30mg wellbutrin generic 75 mg zovirax generic valtrex taking 30mg cialis 10mg lexapro alcohol augmentin 500 mg antybiotyk cialis generico venezuela walmart 50mg viagra when cialis generic cialis 10 mg bugiardino augmentin 875 mg indicaciones cialis prescribed online zithromax generic us viagra generico 2013 cialis 10 mg posologia omg viagra propecia generic fda levitra online bahrain lexapro generic recall paypal buy cialis clomid mg ml generic priligy 90mg strattera 100mg price metformin 500 mg kinderwunsch drug generic synthroid lexapro 30 mg pregnancy prospecto nexium 40 mg buy 100 mg viagra generic 100 mg viagra cipro 500 mg wikipedia zithromax 9 pills 1000mg official viagra online cheapest generic propecia lisinopril 2.5 mgs 8 tab prednisone 10 mg buy levitra australia dosage valtrex 500 mg durata cialis 10 mg lisinopril 10 mg hydrochlorothiazide lisinopril dosage 30 mg 3200 mg bactrim cialis 5mg medstore generic like viagra generic viagra guidelines achat viagra 25 mg lexapro 2.5mg anxiety order viagra uk anxiety lexapro 5mg levitra tablets 10mg zithromax 500 mg opis viagra online chemist generic cipla viagra 200 mg zoloft overdose aspect online viagra viagra 150 mg france online viagra erfahrung 18 mg of strattera taking 2 50mg zoloft cialis 35mg metformin hci 500 mg cialis 5mg nasil generic propecia online 5mg generic levitra stopping zoloft 25 mg cialis 20 mg 30 tb clomid 50mg testosterone generic lexapro paxil valtrex goes generic augmentin 12h generico cheapest cialis 5mg image metformin 500 mg 20 mg cialis instructions buy generic amoxil wellbutrin 150 mg sigara cialis 5 mg two tricare 5mg cialis online butik viagra cialis loan online doxycycline 100 mg acne cipro cfcmg buying doxycycline 100mg canadian levitra 20mg nolvadex 5 mg celebrex going generic kamagra online romania cialis texas 20mg buy zovirax 400 mg buy viagra california buying cialis tijuana bijsluiter viagra 50 mg clomid 50mg success buy liquid propecia cheapest prednisone online generic red viagra generic love viagra harga metformin 500mg buy glucophage uk doxycycline 1000 mg generic shop kamagra medicijn nexium 40mg tetracycline 250 mg acne is zovirax generic cipro 500mg directions buy lisinopril medication kamagra 100 gold cheap strattera 40 mg dose viagra 50 mg nebenwirkungen bactrim forte 800 160mg viagra generics safe cytotec buy online buy levitra brand apo doxycycline 100mg prednisone 20 mg insomnia generic term lexapro walmart 25 mg viagra 1500 mg of metformin twins 25 mg clomid walmart buy viagra prednisone generic deltasone buying cialis legal zovirax 400 mg tabletas cialis 20 mg color take 2 100 mg viagra buy cipro antibiotic kamagra tablet 50 mg buy 25 mg viagra celebrex 500 mg diflucan online ordering cialis 2,5mg bestellen celebrex caps 200 mg generic cialis, 5 mg cialis internet order amoxil bd 875 mg cipro antibiotic online brazil viagra buy 20 mg cialis canada order cialis line khasiat cytotec 200mg synthroid dosage 150 mg cialis 20mg korea viagra 50mg safe viagra buy cheapest erfahrungsberichte levitra 20mg lexapro generic order viagra 25 vs 50 mg prednisone mylan 5mg cialis 20 mg shipping generic lexapro buy viagra bali buy generic viagra 150 mg. buy cialis wholesale order propecia singapore generic lexapro oral generic viagra internet 200 mg viagra buy zoloft 100mg generic cialis fedex Levitra 120 pills order australia generic viagra 550 mg zoloft wirkung levitra 5mg prednisone 10mg online thailand viagra online cheapest priligy online 200 mg viagra dangerous tab zovirax 800 mg cialis 2.5mg sale nolvadex 60 mg capsule medicament levitra 10 mg zoloft 50mg cena buying cipro online levitra dosage 40 mg cialis c50 online generic valtrex canada nexium generic prescription viagra discount cheap celebrex 200 mg dose generic viagra list 90 mg synthroid furosemida lasix 20 mg amoxil dosage mg wholesale viagra buyer existe priligy generico kamagra acquisto online augmentin bid 875 125 mg propecia 5 mg dangers buy viagra 150 mg zovirax tabletki 200 mg harga viagra 25mg viagra online kamagra nexium drug generic strattera cheap online buy 10 mg lexapro buy erythromycin canada generic lasix 40 mg lisinopril 10 mg ratiopharm thread cheap viagra manfaat doxycycline 100 mg bijwerkingen nexium 40 mg generic brand xenical kabdungan celebrex 300 mg lisinopril tab 10 mg propranolol non generic buy viagra men doxycycline 100mg forum generic zoloft 50 mg taper prednisone 50mg nexium generic wiki generic cialis cyprus strattera 40 mg wirkung levitra 20mg usa 1.35 clomid 50mg forum Sale Levitra 10 mg buying viagra shops
Home All Articles Busch Corollary: Valuating Second-Hand Naming Rights

Like Shoot to Thrill - An AC/DC Tribute on Facebook!

An authentic tribute of AC/DC that covers the best of the Bon Scott era and the best of Brian Johnson's material

Who's Online?

We have 795 guests online

Atom RSS

Busch Corollary: Valuating Second-Hand Naming Rights PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 21
PoorBest 
Articles & Opinion
Written by Kurt Hunzeker   
Wednesday, 15 August 2007 16:19
 Busch Corollary Analysis
           Select the image to see a break
              down of the Busch Corollary

Kurt Hunzeker, of the Business of Sports Network, releases this intriguing article which looks to place a definative value on a secondary naming rights deal. Enjoy, The Busch Corollary:  Second-hand Naming-Rights Diminished Value Equation - Maury Brown, Founder and President - Business of Sports Network

When shopping for a previously-owned car, a prospective buyer should utilize all of the resources available (like CARFAX) to ensure he or she is not purchasing a lemon.  A car is a serious investment, and careful consideration and a thorough understanding of prices, safety reports and re-sale value should be paramount before a transaction takes place.

Sports venues’ naming-rights deals should be no different, but in today’s sports business and sponsorship marketplace, a CARFAX-esque report or analysis of a second-hand naming-rights agreement does not exist.  If one existed, corporate decision-makers might be able to sleep at night, knowing that their new naming-rights deal was secured at a favorable price.

Now, The Busch Corollary arms them with a second-hand naming-rights deal’s quantifiable “diminished value,” based solely on hard numbers about the venue and the previous rights holders.

In terms of distinguishing value, consider that the original rights holder reaps the benefits of branding a new sports venue, and one of the city’s most well-known landmarks.  The first name associated with a building automatically becomes the reflex standard; everyone remembers the building by its original name.  One does not need a mathematical equation to see this long-lasting value.

It does not matter if the name is corporate-based (i.e. San Diego’s PETCO Park) or a family name (Cleveland’s Jacobs Field); the first name will be the first answer when asked where does “insert-team-name-here” play.

This past February, I introduced the idea of The Busch Corollary in an effort to define the sports industry’s widely-accepted practice of re-selling a venue’s naming-rights sponsorships.  But one needs to measure this phenomenon in order to fully understand the ramifications of teams entering into agreements with financially-questionable companies, and the price companies pay in brand value when they rename a sports venue due to a merger or buyout.

Corporations see sports venues’ naming rights as a national advertising vehicle that expands their audience and their ability to communicate with a desirable demographic in a non-obtrusive environment.  Every naming-rights deal includes additional components like luxury suites, broadcast commercial time and other marketing opportunities.  Companies aim to maximize their investments by creating revenue-generating platforms and other programming (ticket giveaways, exclusive experiences, sweepstakes, etc.) around their namesake venue.

From a branding perspective alone, corporations utilize naming-rights agreements as a direct way to increase the value of its brand by aligning it squarely with that of the hometown team.

For second-hand naming-rights holders, does this perceived increase in team-transferred brand value offset the inherent loss of value in their hand-me-down naming-rights deal?

A study of existing, second-hand naming-rights agreements and a look at what a potential buyer would be receiving by renaming a one-owner/name venue suggest that a considerable loss of value is almost guaranteed with any “previously-owned” naming-rights deal.

(Select Read More to see the rest of this ground breaking research) 

THE BUSCH COROLLARY DEFINITION

When Anheuser-Busch purchased the St. Louis Cardinals in 1953, new owner August Anheuser “Gussie” Busch, Jr. wanted to rename Sportsman’s Park to Budweiser Stadium as part of a new, national advertising strategy.  Back then, Major League Baseball did not allow alcoholic beverage names to adorn their ballparks’ facades.

(The enterprising beer magnate then asked if he could change the ballpark’s moniker to “Busch Stadium” to honor to his family.  After receiving league approval, Gussie Busch green-lighted the development of a new brand at the brewery, and the very next year, Busch Beer entered the marketplace.)

But St. Louisians never used the new name for their old ballpark.  Sportsman’s Park was Sportsman’s Park, and the brewery’s renaming was not going to change their habits.

When the Cardinals began construction on its new home, Gussie Busch made sure that this new ballpark would be christened as Busch Stadium.  Since this new venue did not have any other name before it opened in 1966, fans always considered it Busch Stadium.

In the truest, mathematical definition of the term, The Busch Corollary suggests that any second-hand naming-rights agreement will always have perceived diminished value compared to the original titleholder’s initial agreement, unless the selling property sets its price comparable (if not equal) to the relationship between the former rights holder’s price, the number of names the venue has been known as, and the total number of years the building was known by a different name.

The question potential buyers must ask themselves centers on how much value are they willing to overpay for the naming-rights agreement, or better yet, how much value-added components must the team include in the sponsorship package to offset this loss in brand value.

And how does one quantify this diminished value?

THE BUSCH COROLLARY EQUATION

Using simple algebraic letters to denote naming-rights deals’ quantifiable variables, The Busch Corollary Equation calculates the percentage of diminished value percentage (dv, which will always be a negative number) for non-original, naming-rights agreements:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

The variables to solve such an equation remain the same regardless of sport:

s = second-hand rights holder’s annual sponsorship fee
p = previous rights holder(s)’ average annual sponsorship fee
n = total number of names the venue has held since its opening
y = total number of years the venue had a previous rights holder(s)’ name

THE BUSCH COROLLARY – HOUSTON ASTROS’ MINUTE MAID PARK

Here is an example using the Houston Astros’ two naming-rights holders for its ballpark:  Enron Field (2000-2002) and Minute Maid Park (2003-present):

s = Minute Maid pays $6,357,143 annually, per its naming-rights agreement
p = Enron paid $6,500,000 annually
n = The ballpark has had three (3) names, including the 2-month, interim solution, Astros Field
y = The Enron Field/Astros Field brands lasted only two (2) years before Minute Maid signed

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $6,357,143 / [($6,500,000 / 3) / 2]

dv = $6,357,143 / [$2,166,667 / 2]

dv = $6,357,143 / $1,083,334

dv = (5.87%)

According to The Busch Corollary Equation, the diminished value of Minute Maid’s naming-rights agreement with the Astros is 5.87 percent.  Based on Minute Maid’s annual payment, this equates to a value overpayment of approximately $373,046.

If Minute Maid’s executives had something like The Busch Corollary Equation during their negotiations with the Astros, they could have plugged in the offered annual fee of $6,357,143 and countered with a “more equitable value price” of $5,984,097.

Two points to consider: 1) At least the Astros’ lowered the annual sponsorship fee, and 2) Minute Maid could have received this “value back” by way of additional advertising time during broadcasts or any other added marketing opportunities with the team.

Even if you inserted this “more equitable value price” into the calculation, the result will always contain a percentage of diminished value, due to the clear-cut fact that any subsequent naming-rights holder will never have the same value the original owner had:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $5,984,097 / [($6,500,000 / 3) / 2]

dv = (5.52%)

Based on what the previous rights holder paid, how long its name was in use and the total number of names the building was known as, the Astros would have had to offer “the fair market price” (f) of $1,083,334 annually to offset the diminished value:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $1,083,334 / [($6,500,000 / 3) / 2]

dv = $1,083,334 / $1,083,334

dv = 0%    Γ    f = (p / n) / y

As a branding vehicle-only (no other value-added components included), this calculation suggests Minute Maid should only pay the fair market price of $1,083,334 annually when it signed its deal in 2002.

Based on this analysis, two results are clear: 1) Minute Maid receives more than $5.27 million in value-added units to justify its investment, and 2) the Astros made a financially terrible mistake in using “Astros Field” as an interim name.

Understanding that the Enron name tarnished anyone or anything associated with it, the team lost value in its naming rights by changing it to a generic name.  If anything, the Astros should have just removed all mentions of Enron and left the building without a name until a new naming-rights sponsor emerged.  The percentage of diminished value would have been substantially smaller if “Astros Field” never surfaced:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $6,357,143 / [($6,500,000 / 2) / 2]

dv = $6,357,143 / [$3,250,000 / 2]

dv = $6,357,143 / $1,625,00

dv = (3.91%)

In effect, adding “Astros Field” as an official ballpark name lowered the annual, naming-rights’ fair market price from $1,625,000 to $1,083,334, for a loss of $541,666 annually.

Since Enron only held its deal for two years, Minute Maid’s diminished value for the ballpark is not as high as if Enron fulfilled its original, 20-year contract.  If that was the case, then the equation would change dramatically:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $6,357,143 / [($6,500,000 / 3) / 20]

dv = $6,357,143 / [$2,166,667 / 20]

dv = $6,357,143 / $108,333

dv = (58.68%)

Since the name “Enron Field” would have been part of the local and national vernacular for 20 years, a new name would not replace it overnight, or even in a few years.  Too many residents would have continued to call the ballpark by its original name, due to 20 years of repetition and habit.  This situation mirrors what Gussie Busch faced with Sportsman’s Park.  Minute Maid would be overpaying more than $3.73 million annually, compared to The Busch Corollary’s suggested “more equitable value price” of $2,626,688 per year.

If Enron held the name until 2020, and the Astros then tried to re-sell the naming rights, any corporate partner looking to simply brand the Astros’ 20-year-old ballpark should not spend more than $108,333 annually, the fair market price for the building’s naming rights.

THE BUSCH COROLLARY – HYPOTHETICAL ANALYSIS

This equation holds water even when using hypothetical situations, such as a possible name change for the Atlanta Braves’ Turner Field due to the team’s recent sale to Liberty Media.

If Liberty Media were to sell the naming rights to the ballpark (which company executives said it will not do), what would be the percentage of diminished value of the new agreement?

Using The Busch Corollary Equation, one can find the answer based the what Liberty Media determines the price would have been if naming rights were sold at the ballpark’s inception in 1997 (pv), the price offered for the new deal (po) and the total number of years the building has been operational.  Since Turner Field has been the only name the ballpark has known, there is no need to insert it into the equation.

For simple mathematical purposes, this hypothetical will use $5 million as the annual fee Liberty is seeking:

pv &  po = Price valued and offered is $5,000,000 annually
n = The ballpark has had only one (1) name: Turner Field
y = Ten (10) years have passed since the ballpark opened in 1997

dv = po / [(pv / n) / y]

dv = $5,000,000 / [($5,000,000 / 1) / 10]

dv = $5,000,000 / [$5,000,000 / 10]

dv = $5,000,000 / $500,000

dv = (10%)

Because Turner Field is 10 years old, the diminished value of any new naming-rights deal would be 10 percent.

WHAT THIS ALL MEANS

The Busch Corollary Equation could be applied to any, non-original naming-rights agreement in any sport.

If a company was considering a naming-rights deal to replace a former agreement, it would have to input a number of different annual fees to closely match The Busch Corollary’s diminished value price, and consider what value-added components the agreement should include to offset this perceived loss of value.

Make no mistake, companies will continue to pay for these high-profile naming-rights sponsorships as a means to advertise itself and associate with the local sports team.  Teams will continue to sell naming-rights packages (even non-venue deals, like parking sections, club levels, concourses, etc.) as a means to generate more revenue.

In November 2006, Citigroup, Inc. and the New York Mets announced its 20-year, $400 million naming-rights deal for the Mets’ new ballpark, Citi Field.  The partnership is far more than a traditional, naming-rights agreement.  For Citigroup, the deal included brand and business unit presence throughout the new ballpark, rights to the Mets and Citi Field marks, the purchase of media on SportsNet New York (SNY) and the launch of community outreach initiatives.

With ballparks currently under construction in Minneapolis and Washington (DC), the Twins and Nationals, respectively, should expect its naming-rights sponsorship to fetch anywhere between $5 million and $20 million annually, based on recent naming-rights deals such as Citi’s, Brooklyn’s Barclays Center (NBA New Jersey/Brooklyn Nets; 20 years, $400 million), Indianapolis’s Lucas Oil Stadium (NFL Indianapolis Colts; 20 years, $121.5 million) and Newark’s Prudential Center (for the NHL New Jersey Devils; 20 years, $105.3 million).

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN EXISTING DEALS EXPIRE?

It will be very interesting to see what happens when existing, long-term deals expire in the next 10-20 years.  For instance, what company would pay millions of dollars to brand the former Citizens Bank Park in 2029?

If the Phillies attempted to sell that inventory again at the same annual price (regardless of increases in inflation), the diminished value would be extraordinary because Phillies’ fans and Philadelphia residents alike would have been calling the ballpark “Citizens Bank Park” for 25 years.  The old axiom suggests one “cannot teach an old dog new tricks,” and the numbers back that statement as it relates to renaming a sports venue:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $3,800,000 / [($3,800,000 / 1) / 25]

dv = $3,800,000 / [$3,800,000 / 25]

dv = $3,800,000 / $152,000

dv = (25%)

Corporations should be VERY wary about the value they will receive in return of their hefty financial investment.  Old venues, ones with two or more previous naming-rights holders and deals with annual payments near to what previous companies paid should be avoided at all costs.

Consider the perceived complete loss of naming-rights value of Oakland’s McAfee Coliseum, even though the name has been officially owned by only two entities: Alameda County and Network Associates/McAfee, Inc.

Drawbacks can be found in every facet of the calculation: the venue’s antiquated age by today’s standards (opened in 1966) and the fact that the venue has had four (4), different names in its 41-year history – Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, UMAX Coliseum, Network Associates Coliseum and McAfee Coliseum – only three of which under its current name.

The county originally sold the first corporate title sponsorship to UMAX in 1997, only to have a court order wipe out the deal.  After signing on as the naming-rights sponsor in 1998, Network Associates renamed itself McAfee in 2004, and changed the multi-purpose stadium’s name along with it.

The loss in value due to these moves is remarkable, especially when you consider that the annual price point has not changed from Network Associates’ original deal:

dv = s / [(p / n) / y]

dv = $1,180,000 / [($1,180,000 / 4) / 38]

dv = $1,180,000 / [$295,000 / 38]

dv = $1,180,000 / $7,763

dv = (152%)

According to this model, the latest naming-rights deal to Oakland’s Coliseum provided nearly no brand value for McAfee.  Because of its voluntary name change, McAfee lowered the naming-rights fair market value to just $7,763 per year.  The fact that the Coliseum is 41 years old hurt more than McAfee’s switch from Network Associates.

This is an extreme example, and considering the typical bells-and-whistles teams add to a top-tier sponsorship level such as naming-rights agreements, corporate partners due receive a fair amount of value with their high-profile deals.

CONCLUSION

The Busch Corollary Equation should not be the lone factor in determining whether or not a company signs on as a naming-rights sponsor.

What The Busch Corollary strongly suggests is for potential rights holders (a ballpark’s naming rights, a NASCAR race’s title sponsorship, an MLS team’s jersey sponsor, etc.) to thoroughly conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the big-ticket item they are about to purchase, and what value and value-added components they will receive and utilize from such an agreement.

Source: The Business of Sports Network research, SportsBusiness Journal’s 2007 Sports Business Resource Guide and Fact Book


Kurt Hunzeker is a staff member of the Business of Sports Network. He is the former editor of the Team Marketing Report, and the founder Sparts Marketing (www.spartsmarketing.com), a sports-centric design and consulting firm where sports, art and marketing fuse together to create award-winning campaigns, unique brand identities and innovative sponsorship platforms.

He, as well as all other authors on The Biz of Baseball can be contacted through the Author Profiles page.

 
 
Banner

Poll

Should MLB Force Jeffery Loria to Sell the Marlins?