|
Maury Brown Article Archive
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Thursday, 26 January 2012 15:48 |
|

It’s often said that players in MLB “make too much money.” In relationship to some professions (teachers often get cited), the relationship in pay gets brought up. Of course, when you really think about it, MLB is really a form of entertainment. It’s a capitalism thing – supply and demand – if people didn’t pay the money they did to watch games and purchase merchandise, well… players wouldn’t make as much.
But, with the Fielder signing, I made the comment to my Baseball Prospectus brethren that “the AL had gone bat-s%$# crazy” in terms of spending.”
Rebecca Glass responded by asking, “Have you thought about looking at how some of the salaries add up compared to the gross-domestic product (GDP) of some small countries?” I said I hadn’t but it would be a fun look.
To that end, Rebecca hit Wikipedia and came up with below.
If you combine A-Rod’s current deal, plus the recent Pujols and Fielder signings, you come up with a total contract amount of $729 million. These countries have a GDP less than that:
In Millions
Source: Wikipedia Special thanks to Rebecca Glass
Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. Hewrites for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).
Follow Maury Brown on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
Maury Brown Article Archive
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Tuesday, 24 January 2012 14:28 |
|
The NFL is king. Or, at least it’s king on television. No matter your sports allegiance, it’s an undeniable fact. To put this in perspective, the Conference Championship games this past weekend averaged 53.7 million, making it the most watched Conference Championship Sunday since 1982. The Giants-Niners game on FOX drew 57.6 million viewers to rank as the third most-watched conference championship, ever.
The Ravens, Patriots game pulled in 48.7 million on CBS.
What did Game 6 of the World Series last season draw? 21.06 million viewers, or less than half the Conference Championship Sunday average.
When I published my article for Baseball Prospectus last week (see Selig’s To-Do List), one commenter declared that Selig should be blamed for allowing the NFL’s ascension to surpass baseball on television.
It’s not Selig’s fault. It’s an awful lot about timing.
What I mean is this: the growth in the NFL’s popularity can be tied closely to the television becoming a commonplace household appliance, and Pete Rozell’s brilliance in making the NFL part of the American landscape on the weekends and Monday night.
It’s also about the game’s design.
The NFL is the only Big-4 sport (up until MLB adds the additional Wild Card teams) that thrives on “win, or go home”—every game in the postseason is sudden death. That lends itself to the excitement which boosts the ratings and viewership needle.
Another thing is the field and timed play. With almost full adoption of theater-aspect ratio to television screens, it’s as if the football field was designed for HD. Throw in that in today’s fast paced society, fans know that on the weekend, games will start and end (unless OT), right around the same time.
It’s a formula that works. We can argue about whether the best team really wins any given playoff game. We can talk about whether the sport has the same level of intellect as others. But, no one—not Selig, or anyone else—can alter baseball in the near-term to get to the NFL’s excitement level.
And, maybe it’s how it should be.
Major League Baseball is incredibly popular. Is it as popular on television? No. Is it a better experience in person? Many would argue that.
But, baseball should never rush to alter its core design all in an attempt to be competitive with the NFL in terms of television. There are massive, and insanely lucrative national broadcast deals on the horizon for MLB. That shows that the game is still a winner with the likes of ESPN, FOX, and TBS, and more importantly, the fans. Being second isn’t a bad place to be.
Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He writes for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).
Follow Maury Brown on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
Pete Toms Article Archive
|
|
Written by Pete Toms
|
|
Monday, 23 January 2012 20:52 |
|

This week in “Last Week in BizBall“, paperless ticketing and the secondary market, plus tidbits.
PAPERLESS TICKETING & THE SECONDARY MARKET
Last month I blogged about the problems that secondary ticketing has created for many MLB franchises. Many clubs believe that the secondary market has diminished the value of their season tickets and hurt their walk up gate. Within that post I brought attention to reports that the Braves are offering some ticket inventory via Ticketmaster’s paperless option. There was speculation that the Braves motive behind this offering was to control this inventory if/when it is offered on the secondary market. Tickets purchased via Ticketmaster’s paperless offering can only be resold via Ticketmaster. In May, I blogged about the glut of cheap MLB tickets on the secondary market. At that time I wrote, “…across professional sports, clubs appear set to impose stricter controls over who they allow to resell “their” tickets. This initiative is made more feasible with the move to “paperless ticketing” which will allow ticketing vendors to impose restrictions on reselling. Ultimately, some speculate the future of ticketing will be decided in court over the question of who owns the ticket and what they are allowed to do with it.” LWIB, the New York Times published an Op-Ed piece from Albert A. Foer. Mr. Foer is president of the American Antitrust Institute and formerly a lawyer with the FTC. Mr. Foer’s piece is a direct attack against the practice of paperless ticketing and the restrictions it imposes on where and how a ticket can be resold.
But in reality, the restrictions represent an effort to control the secondary-ticketing market and stifle competition from independent resellers and resale marketplaces like StubHub, where tickets are often sold for less than face value. (The American Antitrust Institute, of which I am president, received a modest contribution, in the form of sponsorship of a conference last year, from an advocacy group financed in part by StubHub.) Paperless tickets bought through Ticketmaster may be resold, for example, only through its own resale Web site, which often prohibits sales below face value, sets maximum sale prices and charges a fee for transfers.
As Mr. Foer notes, the practice of paperless ticketing is today a very minor concern. He estimates that it represents about 1% of all live-event tickets sold. But, going forward, will an increasing number of MLB tickets be sold via the paperless option? After all, it isn’t the tickets being resold on StubHub at greater than face value that is the problem. The problem many clubs have is the cannibalizing of their primary sales due to large amounts of inventory for low-demand games dumped on the secondary market for well below face value by ticket brokers and season ticket holders. If clubs, via the paperless option, can control where and how “their” ticket is resold and, more importantly, set the secondary price….problem solved.
MLB’s formal secondary ticketing partnership with StubHub expires after this upcoming season. Commissioner Selig has already acknowledged that secondary ticketing is problematic for MLB as evidenced by his formation of a committee last year to study the situation. MLB’s unrivalled success in digital media and soaring value of local media rights rightfully garner much attention when the industry’s record $7 billion plus annual revenues is discussed. But, good ol butts in the seats remains the industry’s largest single source of revenue. More recently we are also beginning to understand that secondary ticketing is not only important to MLB but to fans of MLB also.
SELECT READ MORE TO SEE THIS WEEK'S TIDBITS
|
|
Salary Arbitration
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Monday, 23 January 2012 14:50 |
|

As we’ve done for several seasons now, The Biz of Baseball has been updated to give you all the players that have exchanges figures as part of the salary arbitration process.
(SEE SALARY ARBITRATION FIGURES)
The table is broken out by:
- Player
- Club
- Position
- Major League Service Time
- Number of Times Player In Arb Process (Includes listing Super Twos)
- Player Asking Figure
- Club Offering Figure
- The Difference Between the Two
- The Mid-Point Between the Two
- Resolution
Some interesting tidbits:
- There were 43 players that exchanged figures out of the 142 that filed
- The two clubs with the highest number (4 ea) are the Diamondbacks and the Orioles.
- The largest gap to overcome is between Matt Garza and the Cubs at $4.55 million. Garza is seeking $12.5 million while the Cubs are offering $7.95 million. Mid-point is $10.225 million.
- Tim Lincecum’s $21.5 million asking figure is just $1 million less than the record ever garnered through the salary arbitration process to Roger Clemens in 2004. But, there’s a catch in that… Clemens was a free agent and had been in the league years (his service time then was 20.142). Lincecum’s number is the highest asking figure ever for a non-free agent. The mid-point between the Giants ($17 million) and Lincecum is a whopping $19.25 million.
- The “file and go” system seems to work for the Rays. Just one player (Jeff Niemann) exchanged figures with the club.
- NL MVP Clayton Kershaw in his first year of salary arbitration is asking $10 million from the Dodgers. If the two went to hearing, and the Kershaw won, it would equal the highest award for a first time salary player (Howard).
See a complete listing of salary arbitration figures dating back to 2009
Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He writes for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).
Follow Maury Brown on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
|
Free Agency, Trades, and Signings
|
|
Written by Joe Tetreault
|
|
Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:54 |
|

Dan Shaughnessy, who long ago did his heel turn, had already blasted the club’s ownership for the penny pinching ways, when Red Sox GM compounded the complaints with a text book salary dump sending designated starting shortstop Marco Scutaro to the Colorado Rockies for righty Clayton Mortensen.
The move perplexes Rob Neyer. And the overall tenor of the offseason has largely upset legions of Red Sox Nation. The acquisition of Andrew Bailey being the primary positive among a sea of head scratchers.
But the tactics are not designed to construct a playoff roster. They are designed to avoid the newly sterner luxury tax penalties as spelled out in MLB’s new collective bargaining agreement. The Biz of Baseball’s Maury Brown touched on this topic when the new CBA was announced in November:
The Competitive Balance Tax (CBT), or as it’s commonly known as the Luxury Tax that has been part of MLB, stopped at the end of the season. It’s back in the new agreement, with some undefined tweaks. In a sign that the players are happy with where the model currently is, the soft cap for the league will see no changes in the threshold from the 2011 season -- $178 million based on end-of-year salaries
The quiet offseasons that both the Red Sox and Yankees have overseen suggest both clubs find the new provisions onerous enough to pull back from their free-spending ways. The Yankees big splash came in two pieces just over a week ago. First they dealt Jesus Montero and Hector Noesi for Michael Pineda and minor leaguer Jose Campos. Then they announced an agreement with Hiroki Kuroda on a one-year contract for the budget conscious price tag of $10 million.
Still, the Red Sox and Yankees both face the prospect of exceeding the tax threshold in 2012. The Yankees certainly will. Boston is working like crazy to prevent that.
Speculation centers around Roy Oswalt. The Red Sox would not have been able to sign the veteran right handed starter, even at his reduced salary demand of one-year and $8 million unless they moved some salary. Thus exits Scutaro.
Among the agida inducing activities Cherrington continues to deal with is the club’s full slate of players facing salary arbitration. And with David Ortiz seeking $16.5 million the Red Sox were looking at an even greater cash crunch.
They settled one of their cases last night, with an announcement sent out minutes after the trade was officially announced. Right-handed reliever Daniel Bard agreed with the team on a one-year deal for the $1.6125 million. The two met int he middle between Bard’s asking price of $1.825 million and the club’s offer of $1.4 million. The contract represents a raise of 219.3% over his 2011 salary. He qualified as a Super Two player.
Bard is a candidate to start for the Red Sox in 2012 after serving as the club’s primary set up for Jonathan Papelbon since joining the team in mid-May of 2009. He and Alfredo Aceves, who is also poised to go to an arbitration hearing, are both looking to shift from the pen to a starting role. Picking up Oswalt would ensure one, if not both, would be back in the bullpen next year.
Joe Tetreault is a contributor to the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He can be contacted here through The Biz of Baseball
Follow Joe Tetreault on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter 
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
Maury Brown Article Archive
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Friday, 20 January 2012 13:20 |
 Yu Darvish has been signed with the Rangers. Here's the breakdown |
With 5 minutes left before the deadline to get him signed, agent Arn Tellem and the Texas Rangers agreed on a six-year, $56 million deal that sees $49 million of it guaranteed and the 2017 salary of $11 million a player option based on certain awards. According to Cot’s Contracts, that player option kicks in if 1) Darvish wins the Cy Young in 2012-16 or 2) 2nd in voting once in another season for 2012-16 and finishes 2nd-4th in two other seasons 2012-16.
To add, he gets a roster bonus of $800,000 annually if he stays off the DL. If he’s on the DL more than 30 days, the $800K is reduced by $5,228.75 per day starting on Day 31.
He gets some standard boilerplate award provisions, as well. Darvish gets $50,000 each for AL ROY, All-Star. $100,000 for Gold Glove, LCS MVP. $150,000 for World Series MVP, $250,000 ea for AL MVP or Cy Young ($200,000 if 2nd if either voting category, $150,000 for 3rd, $100,000 for 4th, $50,000 for 5th)
Here’s the salary break down
- 2012 - $5.5M
- 2013 - $9.5M
- 2014 - $10M
- 2015 - $10M
- 2016 - $10M
- 2017 - $11M (player option based on Cy Young voting)
Confused? There’s more.
There’s the posting fee.
By tomorrow, the Rangers will have had to have made the $51,703,411 posting fee payment to the Nippon Fighting Hams, a new record high. It’s how that money moves around on the books that is interesting.
The posting fee money does not count toward player payroll, which is key as the Rangers had a player payroll at the end of the 2011 season in excess of $106 million. Because the posting fee money does not count as player payroll, it’s not counted against the CBT (or, as it’s more commonly known, the Luxury Tax).
Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News reported that the fee will be amortized over 6 years, which brings the $52 million fee down over time.
From an ownership perspective, Darvish is both an asset and a liability. The difference is in how the money is placed in the ledger.
If the posting fee were connected to the contract and that amortized payment moved out over the 6-years with the guaranteed money, he would be more difficult to move if the Rangers saw fit. That $10 million a year at the end of the contract looks more far forgiving that $16 or $17 million.
As one sports exec said of the posting fee being attached to the contract or not is “fungible” from an ownership perspective.
On paper, Darvish comes off eye-popping at possibly $111 million. The 2017 player option year allows for Darvish to opt out if he hits all the marks. The posting fee is also a massive write-off, which lowers its true cost further.
It’s enough to make your head swim, especially when you consider this: Yu Darvish’s current Major League Service Time is 0.000. RELATED CONTENT Demystifying the Posting System for Japanese Players Entering MLB
Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He writes for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).
Follow Maury Brown on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
Maury Brown Article Archive
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Thursday, 19 January 2012 12:15 |
|
File this one in the “broken record” department: prepare for yet another season of MLB’s blackout policy remaining in place.
The reason for the broken record? This story has been written repeatedly for years. A source at MLB said that for all practical purposes, the matter will likely not be addressed for the upcoming season.
For the uninitiated, the question is, “Why should I be concerned?” That depends on whether you are, or planning to, purchase MLB Extra Innings or subscribe to MLB.TV.
In a nutshell, there are two ways you can be hit with the “blackout blues”. National broadcast partners FOX and ESPN have exclusivity agreements in which no matter where you live, games are blacked out on MLB Extra Innings and MLB.TV.
There’s also local blackouts depending on your location that can impact one, or up to as many as six teams being blacked out in your location.
See the map below for MLB’s television territories:
|

MLB's blackout map is a confusing case of overlapping territories (CLICK TO SEE IN LARGER VIEW)
|
Here’s how DirecTV defines the blackout policy:
All local and national blackout restrictions still apply. In other words, subscribers within a club's Home Television Territory cannot get that clubs’ games in this national package. In addition, due to the national exclusivity of both FOX and ESPN, there are no games available for distribution via this package on Saturday day or Sunday night, respectively.
If you live in a ZIP code that is within a Major League Baseball team's territory, that team's games will be blacked out from the MLB EXTRA INNINGS game package, but will generally be available as part of your regional sports network or team's over-the-air affiliate television station. Blackouts protect the local rightsholders who arrange separate distribution agreements with the teams for their exclusive territories
Maybe this will change, but DirecTV has historically provided no zip code locator to allow you to see whether you’re blacked out.
While MLB.com has fine print in a light font on a white page for MLB.TV’s blackout restrictions (scroll to the bottom of this page), at least they provide more details (and this is important) two methods that allow you to see what games you are going to be blacked out for. DirecTV users, this may be where you save yourself some grief (and possibly money) by using MLB’s information to determine whether to shell out around $200 for a first-time Extra Innings subscriber.
MLB adds this information on local blackouts, as well, on their MLB.TV page:
All live games on MLB.TV and available through MLB.com At Bat are subject to local blackouts. Such live games will be blacked out in each applicable Club's home television territory, regardless of whether that Club is playing at home or away. If a game is blacked out in an area, it is not available for live game viewing. If you are an MLB.TV Premium subscriber and not within either Club's home television territory, the applicable game will be available as an archived game as soon as possible after the conclusion of the game. If you are an MLB.TV Premium subscriber within either Club's home television territory or an MLB.TV subscriber in any territory, the applicable game will be available as an archived game approximately 90 minutes after the conclusion of the game. Archived games are not available through MLB.com At Bat.
In addition, note:
-
- These blackout restrictions apply regardless of whether a Club is home or away and regardless of whether or not a game is televised in a Club's home television territory.
- All live Toronto Blue Jays games are blacked out throughout the entire country of Canada.
- Additional teams may also be subject to blackout in parts of Canada based on their region.
- All live games will be blacked out in the U.S. territories of Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands during the MLB regular season.
Remember, this is for Monday-Friday. The weekend is where matters change dramatically.
ESPN SATURDAY AND FOX SUNDAY NATIONALBLACKOUTS
MLB gives this information on how ESPN’s and FOX’s national blackout deal works. FOX holds the rights to Saturday games, while ESPN gets games in the evening on Sundays.
Due to Major League Baseball exclusivities, live games occurring each Saturday with a scheduled start time after 1:10 PM ET or before 7:05 PM ET and each Sunday with a scheduled start time after 5:00 PM ET, will be blacked out in the United States (including the territories of Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands). In addition, in the event of extraordinary circumstances that produce a programming conflict, the above blackout windows may be subject to change. If you are an MLB.TV Premium subscriber outside of the United States, each of these games will be available as an archived game as soon as possible after the conclusion of the applicable game. If you are an MLB.TV Premium Subscriber within the United States or an MLB.TV subscriber in any territory, each of these games will be available as an archived game approximately 90 minutes after the conclusion of the applicable game. Archived games are not available through MLB.com At Bat.
There’s more… What if the season goes beyond 162 games, such as we saw last year with a play-in game?
Regular Season Play-In Game: Due to Major League Baseball exclusivities, any play-in game to determine the final team(s) to reach the MLB Postseason, i.e. a 163rd game, will be blacked out in the United States (including the territories of Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands).
And, blackouts impact the postseason…
Postseason Live Blackout: Due to Major League Baseball exclusivities, during the MLB Postseason, all live games will be blacked out in the United States (including the territories of Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands) and Canada. If you are an MLB.TV Premium Subscriber outside of the United States and Canada, each of these games will be available as an archived game as soon as possible after the conclusion of the applicable game. If you are an MLB.TV Premium Subscriber within the United States or Canada or an MLB.TV subscriber in any territory, each of these games will be available as an archived game approximately 90 minutes after the conclusion of the applicable game. Archived games are not available through MLB.com At Bat.
And about the national blackout policy, any chance that happens soon? In speaking with sources close to the matter, when asked if the possibility it won't be considered until contracts are renewed with ESPN and FOX, the reply was, "Probably."
Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He writes for Baseball Prospectus and is a contributor to Forbes SportsMoney blog.. He is available as a freelance writer. Brown's full bio is here. He looks forward to your comments via email and can be contacted through the Business of Sports Network (select his name in the dropdown provided).
Follow Maury Brown on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
Salary Arbitration
|
|
Written by Joe Tetreault
|
|
Wednesday, 18 January 2012 05:21 |
|

Orioles Ink Johnson, but swap figures with their other arbitration eligible players
Dan Connolly tweeted word of Jim Johnson's one year, $2.625 million agreement with the Orioles on Arbitration Deadline Day. The righthanded reliever's new deal represents a 169.2% raise over his 2011 salary of $975,000. In his age 28 season, Johnson posted career bests in innings, strikeouts, wins and most peripheral stats, such as WHIP, BB/9, H/9 and K/9.
Baltimore couldn't settle on terms with Brad Bergesen, Jeremy Guthrie, Adam Jones or Robert Andino. Details of the contract figures each player exchanged with the club will be posted shortly.
Red Sox agree with Ellsbury and Aviles at the Deadline
The Red Sox had the largest number of arbitration eligible players among AL Teams with 8. Additionally, David Ortiz accepted the club's offer of arbitration rather than explore free agency.
AL MVP runner up Jacoby Ellsbury was eligible for arbitration for the second time. The Red Sox and their star centerfielder worked out a $8.05 million contract for 2012, as tweeted by MLB Trade Rumors' Ben Nicholson-Smith. His salary for the coming season represents a 235.4% raise over his 2011 compensation of $2.4 million.
The Boston Herald's John Tomase has details of infielder Mike Aviles one-year $1.2 million contract. Aviles was in his first year of eligibility for arbitration and saw his salary nearly double from 2011's $640,000.
Boston had previously announced the signings of lefty reliever Franklin Morales, catcher Jarrod Saltamacchia and recently acquired outfielder Ryan Sweeney.
Ortiz and a trio of right-handed pitchers - Alfredo Aceves, Andrew Bailey and Daniel Bard - are the remaining unsigned Red Sox players eligible for salary arbitration.
Yankees sign Robertson, Chamberlain
CBS sports' Jon Heyman has details for both deals the Yankees worked out at yesterday's deadline with right handed pitchers Joba Chamberlain and David Robertson. For Chamberlain he and the club agreed on $1.675 million for next season, up a tick from 2011’s $1.4 million contract. Robertson will get $1.6 million with another $25,000 possible in incentives. His guaranteed salary represents a 247.8% raise over what he made in 2011, his final season prior to arbitration eligibility.
Previously, Phil Hughes's agency, CAA announced via twitter that their client and the Yankees agreed on a $3.2 million contract for the coming season.
Outfielder Brett Gardner, catcher Russell Martin and lefty reliever Boone Logan remain unsigned and have exchanged figures with the club.
Rays work out deals with Price, Upton, and Badenhop
In his first year of arbitration eligibility, lefty ace David Price matched the record setting amount the Marlins gave Dontrelle Willis in 2006. He'll make $4.35 million in 2012 on a one-year deal, as initially tweeted by MLB Trade Rumors' Ben Nicholson-Smith. Price had been on a major league contract signed when he was drafted that paid him $1.25 million in its final year. His salary for the coming season represents a 248% raise.
Facing his final salary arbitration go-round, center fielder B.J. Upton settled early and gets $7MM plus playing time incentives, as reported by the Tampa Bay Times' Marc Topkin. Upton had failed to reach an agreement with the club last season and lost his arbitration hearing, receiving a $4.825 million salary for 2011. This year's guaranteed deal is a 45.1% raise for the longest tenured position player with the club.
Topkin also had details on RHP Burke Badenhop's one-year deal with the Rays for $1.075-million. The newly acquired reliever will get a 43.3% raise over the $750,000 he earned in 2011 with the Marlins.
Jeff Niemann remains unsigned and faces a hearing. Rays GM Andrew Friedman has yet to lose an arbitration hearing.
Blue Jays have two hold outs, work out deals with Villanueva, Johnson and Francisco
MLB Trade Rumors' Tim Dierkes reported that the Blue Jays avoided arbitration with second baseman Kelly Johnson, who accepted the club's offer of arbitration after filing for free agency. Johnson will make $6.375 million next season which is a little under a 9% raise from his 2011 salary. The club also came to terms with outfielder Ben Francisco, whom they picked up from the Phillies for minor leaguer Frank Gailey. Francisco gets $1.5375 million in 2012, a raise of 30.9% over the $1.175 million he made last year.
The club also announced their agreement with reliever Carlos Villanueva on a one year, $2.2775 million contract. Villanueva made $1.415 million last season. He gets a 61.0% raise in his final year of arbitration eligibility.
Outfielder Colby Rasmus signed earlier in the week for $2.7 million in 2012.
Right handed pitchers Brandon Morrow and Casey Janssen failed to agree on deals with the club and face hearings next month.
Continuing coverage of Baseball’s Arbitration Season can be found on the Biz of Baseball.com. The deadline for clubs and players to agree on contracts before submitting figures to a panel of arbiters for hearings to be held in February passed yesterday afternoon at noon eastern time. Biz of Baseball’s Maury Brown posted posted the list of 142 players who filed for arbitration on Saturday. We’ll have continuing updates on the arbitration process through February's hearings.
Joe Tetreault is a contributor to the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey. He can be contacted here through The Biz of Baseball
Follow Joe Tetreault on Twitter 
Follow The Biz of Baseball on Twitter 
Follow the Business of Sports Network on Facebook
|
|
MLB News
|
|
Written by Maury Brown
|
|
Tuesday, 17 January 2012 10:31 |
|
The first 2012 Spring Training exhibition will be held on Wednesday, February 29th in Clearwater, Florida, where the Philadelphia Phillies will host Florida State University, while the first Cactus League game will be in Phoenix, Arizona on Friday, March 2nd, when the Seattle Mariners will visit the Oakland Athletics in a preview of Japan Opening Series 2012, Major League Baseball announced today.
Five Grapefruit League games and four Cactus League games are scheduled for Saturday, March 3rd. The Boston Red Sox will debut JetBlue Park at Fenway South in Lee County, Florida on Sunday, March 4th, when the club hosts the Minnesota Twins. The first full slate of action in both Arizona and Florida, involving all 30 Major League Clubs, is Monday, March 5th.
The Mariners and the A’s will complete their Cactus League schedules on Wednesday, March 21st. Major League Baseball will open its regular season in Tokyo for the fourth time when the A’s and the Mariners participate in Japan Opening Series 2012, a two-game set scheduled for March 28th and 29th. Japan Opening Series 2012 will be dedicated to assisting in the rebuilding efforts across Japan.
Select exhibition games at Major League and Minor League ballparks will be played from Saturday, March 31st through Wednesday, April 4th. The Miami Marlins will host the inaugural regular season game at their new downtown ballpark on Wednesday, April 4th, when they will welcome the 2011 World Series Champion St. Louis Cardinals at 7:00 p.m. (ET) on ESPN. Six games are scheduled for Thursday, April 5th and 10 games are scheduled for Friday, April 6th, with the first full slate of regular season games on Saturday, April 7th.
SELECT READ MORE TO SEE THE COMPLETE 2012 SPRING TRAINING SCHEDULE (Subject to change)
|
|
Pete Toms Article Archive
|
|
Written by Pete Toms
|
|
Tuesday, 17 January 2012 10:19 |
|

This week in “Last Week in BizBall“, will BAM cooperate with “TV Everywhere”?, plus the tidbits.
MLBAM AND TV EVERYWHERE
In November, in light of World Series TV ratings, I examined the state of MLB national media rights. In a nutshell, the long term national TV ratings trends for MLB’s marquee events (WS, ASG) are down but demand for rights is robust because live sports remains one of the few TV genres still capable of drawing a mass audience. The next round of negotiations for MLB national TV rights will commence this year as the current deals with ESPN, Fox and Turner expire after the 13 season. Despite flat regular season ratings and the aforementioned declining ratings for the WS and ASG, the current rights holders are expected to bid aggressively with Fox and Turner looking for live sports to boost both distribution and subscriber fees for, respectively, FX and TruTV. In addition, the newly minted NBC Sports Network, backed by Comcast’s deep pockets, is in dire need of more popular programming if they are indeed serious about competing with ESPN. MLB’s current national TV deals bring in approximately $700 million annually. The next round of deals is expected to boost that number to approximately $1 billion annually.
The NFL recently concluded negotiations on extensions with ESPN and their over-the-air broadcast partners. A significant component to all those deals is the so-called “TV Everywhere” initiative which allows (or will eventually allow) the league’s media rights holders to deliver games to their customer’s TVs, tablets, PCs, phones and devices that have not yet been imagined. From my November post:
When MLB’s existing national media deals with ESPN, Fox and Turner were negotiated during the middle of the previous decade, they were largely about TV rights. This next round of national media rights negotiations will be about much more than TV as ESPN, TWC and Fox have rolled out “TV Everywhere” offerings. Tim Brosnan, Major League Baseball’s executive vice president of business operations, told the SportsBusiness Journal earlier this year that “TV Everywhere” is one of the factors in the rapidly escalating value of sports programming rights. “The TV Everywhere revolution that we see happening is part of the driver in this increase in sports rights,” “There is value added when content providers can go on a multiplatform basis.”
But, MLB is unique amongst the so-called “big 4” in that TV rights are controlled by MLB while digital rights are controlled by MLBAM. While MLB’s partners are accustomed to, if not irritated by, negotiating separate marketing and media deals for MLB’s TV and digital, this next round of “TV” negotiations will see this issue become much more contentious. The Sports Business Journal’s media reporter John Ourand wrote a column titled, ESPN and MLB are on a TV Everywhere collision course. John notes that MLB.com is booming, bringing in more than $500 million annually, much of that from online subscriptions (MLB.tv). Obviously, BAM doesn’t want to cannibalize their online video offerings. On the other hand, John notes:
But TV Everywhere has reached critical mass. ESPN now has TV Everywhere deals with companies that represent around 40 percent of the country’s pay-TV subscribers, including the two biggest cable operators (Comcast and Time Warner Cable) and the biggest telco (Verizon). More importantly, ESPN has TV Everywhere deals with all the sports leagues with which it does business.
In its upcoming media rights negotiation with MLB, sources say ESPN has made it clear that it plans to make one bid that wraps in linear TV and digital rights. Up until now, that hasn’t been the case. MLB’s current TV partners interested in TV Everywhere have had to cut separate deals with MLBAM to gain those rights, in addition to the bigger deals with MLB for linear TV rights.
MLB has been, far and away, the most successful amongst the “big 4” in capitalizing on digital media. While BAM has endured criticism on a number of fronts; opposition from some clubs with large equity stakes in RSNs over control of local digital rights, the failure to capitalize on “in market” streaming of live games, exerting too much control over club marketing initiatives on team websites, a secondary ticketing deal with StubHub which some clubs believe has cannibalized their primary sales, a monopoly over online video which ignores the reality of how many young fans consume media via blogs and social platforms….ultimately, BAM is worth a reported $ 2 - $3 billion, which contributes handsomely to the value of all 30 franchises. As well, as mentioned, BAM generates $500 million plus in annual revenues (how much of that is returned to the owners annually is a guessing game). The broadband delivered MLB.tv and At Bat mobile app are both hugely successful offerings. And BAM is unquestionably the industry leader in live online video, providing back end streaming and authentication technologies to the likes of MMOD and ESPN3.
But the upcoming negotiations between BAM and ESPN, and the role of digital rights in any resulting partnership, is a signature moment for MLB. The importance of this negotiation goes beyond the amount of dollars that ESPN is willing to pay MLB. As mentioned, there are many other suitors for MLB’s national TV rights. The bigger issue for MLB may be the loss of profile and status amongst sports fans if their games disappear from ESPN. After accepting OLN’s (subsequently Versus and now NBC Sports Net) offer over ESPN’s, the NHL subsequently received significantly less exposure on SportsCenter. Rightly or wrongly, ESPN has enormous influence over the interests and consumption of sports fans. And ESPN is, understandably, decidedly less motivated to provide exposure to a property that they do not own the rights to. Can MLB cut a deal with ESPN without crippling BAM? Can MLB afford to sever their relationship with ESPN over their “TV Everywhere” demands? The role of BAM in MLB remains as interesting as ever.
SELECT READ MORE TO SEE THIS WEEK'S GREAT LIST OF TIDBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 505 |
|
|
|